• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

庆大霉素治疗淋病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of gentamicin for gonorrhoea treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Office of the Commissioner, 42-09 28th Street, 8-62, Queens, NY 11101, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Dec;88(8):589-94. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050604. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2012-050604
PMID:22917693
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The development of resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents has limited treatment options for gonorrhoea. The potential emergence of cephalosporin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae and cephalosporin allergy in some patients make it necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of other available antimicrobial agents. Gentamicin is widely available in the USA and is used for gonorrhoea treatment in several countries. We conducted a systematic review of the medical literature to assess the effectiveness of gentamicin for treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonococcal infections.

METHODS

Two reviewers assessed relevant articles and independently selected studies that met prespecified selection criteria (including systematic enrolment and assignment to treatment and culture-confirmed diagnosis and outcome). Summary measures for selected studies were pooled using inverse variance-weighted averages with fixed effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I(2), which estimates proportion (0-100%) of variability attributable to heterogeneity between studies. Pooled percentage with negative follow-up culture was compared with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria for selection of recommended therapy (lower 95% CI of efficacy ≥95%).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine potentially relevant studies were identified; three met inclusion criteria. Two studies used 240 mg intramuscular gentamicin and one used 280 mg. Percentages with negative culture after single-dose treatment were 90.7% (n=86), 91.4% (n=220) and 95.0% (n=40). Pooled percentage with negative culture after single-dose treatment was 91.5% (95% CI 88.1% to 94.0%, I(2)=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin does not meet current CDC criteria for recommended treatment of gonorrhoea. However, if cephalosporin resistance emerges, gentamicin may be a useful alternative agent. Evaluation of additional regimens, including combination therapy, is warranted.

摘要

目的

多种抗菌药物耐药性的发展限制了淋病的治疗选择。淋病奈瑟菌头孢菌素耐药性的潜在出现和某些患者对头孢菌素的过敏反应,使得有必要评估其他可用抗菌药物的有效性。庆大霉素在美国广泛应用,并在多个国家用于淋病治疗。我们对医学文献进行了系统评价,以评估庆大霉素治疗单纯性泌尿生殖系淋病奈瑟菌感染的疗效。

方法

两名审查员评估了相关文章,并独立选择符合预定选择标准的研究(包括系统纳入和分配治疗以及培养证实的诊断和结果)。使用固定效应的逆方差加权平均值汇总选定研究的汇总措施。使用 I²评估异质性,该指标估计研究之间差异归因于异质性的比例(0-100%)。与疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)选择推荐疗法的标准(疗效的 95%置信区间下限≥95%)相比,比较了具有阴性随访培养的汇总百分比。

结果

确定了 29 项潜在相关研究,其中 3 项符合纳入标准。两项研究使用 240mg 肌内庆大霉素,一项研究使用 280mg。单剂量治疗后培养阴性的百分比分别为 90.7%(n=86)、91.4%(n=220)和 95.0%(n=40)。单剂量治疗后培养阴性的汇总百分比为 91.5%(95%CI 88.1%至 94.0%,I²=0%)。

结论

庆大霉素不符合当前 CDC 推荐淋病治疗的标准。但是,如果出现头孢菌素耐药性,庆大霉素可能是一种有用的替代药物。需要评估其他方案,包括联合治疗。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of gentamicin for gonorrhoea treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.庆大霉素治疗淋病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Dec;88(8):589-94. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050604. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
Antibiotics for treating gonorrhoea in pregnancy.用于治疗妊娠期淋病的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 21;2(2):CD011167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011167.pub2.
3
Effectiveness of gentamicin for gonorrhoea treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.庆大霉素治疗淋病的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Postgrad Med J. 2013 Mar;89(1049):142-7. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-050604rep.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
6
One dose per day compared to multiple doses per day of gentamicin for treatment of suspected or proven sepsis in neonates.与每日多次剂量的庆大霉素相比,每日一剂治疗新生儿疑似或确诊败血症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD005091. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005091.pub2.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类单药治疗方案用于复发性上皮性卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD008766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008766.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to netilmicin and etimicin in comparison to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides.淋病奈瑟菌体外对奈替米星和依替米星的敏感性与庆大霉素和其他氨基糖苷类药物的比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 May;43(5):821-828. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04782-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
2
In Vitro Study of the Interaction of Gentamicin with Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin against Using Agar Dilution Method.庆大霉素与头孢曲松和阿奇霉素相互作用的体外研究:采用琼脂稀释法对抗…… (原文中“against”后内容缺失)
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Aug 10;11(8):1083. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11081083.
3
Gentamicin Alone Is Inadequate to Eradicate Neisseria Gonorrhoeae From the Pharynx.
庆大霉素单药治疗不足以清除咽部淋病奈瑟菌。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 5;71(8):1877-1882. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1109.
4
Epidemiology, molecular characterisation and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates in Madrid, Spain, in 2016.2016 年西班牙马德里分离株的流行病学、分子特征和药敏情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 2019 Sep 24;147:e274. doi: 10.1017/S095026881900150X.
5
Gentamicin compared with ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-ToG): a randomised non-inferiority trial.庆大霉素与头孢曲松治疗淋病(G-ToG)的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2511-2520. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32817-4. Epub 2019 May 2.
6
Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Isolates in Baltimore, Maryland, 2016: The Importance of Sentinel Surveillance in the Era of Multi-Drug-Resistant Gonorrhea.2016年马里兰州巴尔的摩市分离株的抗菌药物敏感性:多重耐药淋病时代哨点监测的重要性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2018 Aug 17;7(3):77. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics7030077.
7
Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England, February 2018.2018 年 2 月,英国出现一株同时对头孢曲松和高水平阿奇霉素耐药的淋病奈瑟菌株导致治疗失败。
Euro Surveill. 2018 Jul;23(27). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.27.1800323.
8
Gentamicin versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of gonorrhoea (G-TOG trial): study protocol for a randomised trial.庆大霉素与头孢曲松治疗淋病(G-TOG试验):一项随机试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Nov 24;17(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1683-8.
9
Time-kill curve analysis and pharmacodynamic modelling for in vitro evaluation of antimicrobials against Neisseria gonorrhoeae.用于体外评估抗菌药物对淋病奈瑟菌抗菌活性的时间-杀菌曲线分析和药效学建模
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Sep 17;16:216. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0838-9.
10
Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.淋病奈瑟菌的抗菌药物耐药性
Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2014 Aug;25(2):316-31.