Suppr超能文献

分娩期间持续输注硬膜外麻醉:0.0625%布比卡因/0.002%布托啡诺与0.125%布比卡因的随机双盲比较

Continuous infusion epidural anesthesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol and 0.125% bupivacaine.

作者信息

Rodriguez J, Abboud T K, Reyes A, Payne M, Zhu J, Steffens Z, Afrasiabi A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center 90033.

出版信息

Reg Anesth. 1990 Nov-Dec;15(6):300-3.

PMID:2291885
Abstract

The efficacy of pain relief and the maternal and neonatal effects of continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol was compared with the infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine alone in a randomized, double-blind study of 32 women in labor. A test dose of 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine was given to every patient and followed by two epidural regimens in randomized, double-blind manner. Group B-B (bupivacaine/butorphanol) patients received 7.5 ml 0.125% bupivacaine plus 1 mg butorphanol (0.5 ml) followed by an infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.002% butorphanol at a rate of 12 ml/hour; Group B (bupivacaine alone) patients received 8 ml 0.25% bupivacaine followed by an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at a rate of 12 ml/hour. A bolus of 5 ml 0.125% bupivacaine or 0.0625% bupivacaine was given to Group B or B-B, respectively, if additional pain relief was required. Infusion of B-B combination resulted in similar pain relief and fewer patients with motor block than bupivacaine alone; 12% versus 38% in Groups B-B and B, respectively, had motor weakness. A smaller dose of bupivacaine was used in the B-B group compared to the B group; 71 +/- 14 versus 99 +/- 13 mg (mean +/- SEM; p less than 0.05). Progress of labor and the mode of delivery did not differ significantly between the two groups. All infants were vigorous and had normal acid-base status and neurologic adaptive capacity scores. Butorphanol appears to be useful as an adjunct to epidural bupivacaine for continuous epidural infusion during labor without adversely affecting the mother or the neonate.

摘要

在一项针对32名分娩女性的随机双盲研究中,比较了持续硬膜外输注0.0625%布比卡因/0.002%布托啡诺的止痛效果以及对母婴的影响,并与单独输注0.125%布比卡因进行了对比。每位患者均先给予2 ml 0.5%布比卡因的试验剂量,随后以随机双盲方式采用两种硬膜外给药方案。B - B组(布比卡因/布托啡诺组)患者先接受7.5 ml 0.125%布比卡因加1 mg布托啡诺(0.5 ml),随后以12 ml/小时的速率输注0.0625%布比卡因/0.002%布托啡诺;B组(单纯布比卡因组)患者先接受8 ml 0.25%布比卡因,随后以12 ml/小时的速率输注0.125%布比卡因。若需要额外止痛,B组和B - B组分别给予5 ml 0.125%布比卡因或0.0625%布比卡因的推注剂量。与单独使用布比卡因相比,输注布比卡因/布托啡诺组合产生了相似的止痛效果,且运动阻滞的患者更少;B - B组和B组分别有12%和38%的患者出现肌无力。与B组相比,B - B组使用的布比卡因剂量更小;分别为71±14 mg和99±13 mg(平均值±标准误;p<0.05)。两组之间的产程进展和分娩方式没有显著差异。所有婴儿均活力良好,酸碱状态正常,神经适应性能力评分正常。布托啡诺似乎可作为硬膜外布比卡因的辅助药物,用于分娩期间的持续硬膜外输注,且对母亲和新生儿均无不良影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验