Department of Epidemiology and Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jan;30(1):88-99. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss202. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
Non-long terminal repeat retroelements continue to impact the human genome through cis-activity of long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1 or L1) and trans-mobilization of Alu. Current activity is dominated by modern subfamilies of these elements, leaving behind an evolutionary graveyard of extinct Alu and L1 subfamilies. Because Alu is a nonautonomous element that relies on L1 to retrotranspose, there is the possibility that competition between these elements has driven selection and antagonistic coevolution between Alu and L1. Through analysis of synonymous versus nonsynonymous codon evolution across L1 subfamilies, we find that the C-terminal ORF2 cys domain experienced a dramatic increase in amino acid substitution rate in the transition from L1PA5 to L1PA4 subfamilies. This observation coincides with the previously reported rapid evolution of ORF1 during the same transition period. Ancestral Alu sequences have been previously reconstructed, as their short size and ubiquity have made it relatively easy to retrieve consensus sequences from the human genome. In contrast, creating constructs of extinct L1 copies is a more laborious task. Here, we report our efforts to recreate and evaluate the retrotransposition capabilities of two ancestral L1 elements, L1PA4 and L1PA8 that were active ~18 and ~40 Ma, respectively. Relative to the modern L1PA1 subfamily, we find that both elements are similarly active in a cell culture retrotransposition assay in HeLa, and both are able to efficiently trans-mobilize Alu elements from several subfamilies. Although we observe some variation in Alu subfamily retrotransposition efficiency, any coevolution that may have occurred between LINEs and SINEs is not evident from these data. Population dynamics and stochastic variation in the number of active source elements likely play an important role in individual LINE or SINE subfamily amplification. If coevolution also contributes to changing retrotransposition rates and the progression of subfamilies, cell factors are likely to play an important mediating role in changing LINE-SINE interactions over evolutionary time.
非长末端重复逆转录元件通过长散布元件 1(LINE-1 或 L1)的顺式活性和 Alu 的转座继续影响人类基因组。目前的活性主要由这些元件的现代亚家族主导,留下了已灭绝的 Alu 和 L1 亚家族的进化墓地。由于 Alu 是一种非自主元件,依赖 L1 进行逆转录转座,因此这些元件之间的竞争有可能驱动 Alu 和 L1 之间的选择和拮抗协同进化。通过分析 L1 亚家族中同义与非同义密码子的进化,我们发现 C 端 ORF2 cys 结构域在从 L1PA5 到 L1PA4 亚家族的转变中经历了氨基酸替换率的显著增加。这一观察结果与之前报道的同一过渡时期 ORF1 的快速进化相吻合。以前已经重建了祖先 Alu 序列,因为它们的短尺寸和普遍性使得从人类基因组中检索共识序列相对容易。相比之下,创建已灭绝的 L1 拷贝的构建体是一项更加费力的任务。在这里,我们报告了我们重新创建和评估两个祖先 L1 元件(L1PA4 和 L1PA8)的逆转录转座能力的努力,它们分别在约 18 和 40 Ma 时活跃。与现代 L1PA1 亚家族相比,我们发现这两个元件在 HeLa 细胞培养中的逆转录转座测定中均具有相似的活性,并且都能够有效地从几个亚家族中转移动 Alu 元件。尽管我们观察到 Alu 亚家族逆转录转座效率存在一些差异,但这些数据并未显示 LINE 和 SINE 之间可能发生的任何协同进化。群体动态和活跃源元件数量的随机变化可能在个体 LINE 或 SINE 亚家族扩增中发挥重要作用。如果协同进化也有助于改变逆转录转座率和亚家族的进展,那么细胞因子可能在跨越进化时间改变 LINE-SINE 相互作用方面发挥重要的中介作用。