Suppr超能文献

一个评估医疗保健领域研究能力建设的框架。

A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.

作者信息

Cooke Jo

机构信息

Primary Care and Social Care Lead, Trent Research and Development Unit, The University of Sheffield, 219 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Oct 27;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-44.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Building research capacity in health services has been recognised internationally as important in order to produce a sound evidence base for decision-making in policy and practice. Activities to increase research capacity for, within, and by practice include initiatives to support individuals and teams, organisations and networks. Little has been discussed or concluded about how to measure the effectiveness of research capacity building (RCB) DISCUSSION: This article attempts to develop the debate on measuring RCB. It highlights that traditional outcomes of publications in peer reviewed journals and successful grant applications may be important outcomes to measure, but they may not address all the relevant issues to highlight progress, especially amongst novice researchers. They do not capture factors that contribute to developing an environment to support capacity development, or on measuring the usefulness or the 'social impact' of research, or on professional outcomes. The paper suggests a framework for planning change and measuring progress, based on six principles of RCB, which have been generated through the analysis of the literature, policy documents, empirical studies, and the experience of one Research and Development Support Unit in the UK. These principles are that RCB should: develop skills and confidence, support linkages and partnerships, ensure the research is 'close to practice', develop appropriate dissemination, invest in infrastructure, and build elements of sustainability and continuity. It is suggested that each principle operates at individual, team, organisation and supra-organisational levels. Some criteria for measuring progress are also given.

SUMMARY

This paper highlights the need to identify ways of measuring RCB. It points out the limitations of current measurements that exist in the literature, and proposes a framework for measuring progress, which may form the basis of comparison of RCB activities. In this way it could contribute to establishing the effectiveness of these interventions, and establishing a knowledge base to inform the science of RCB.

摘要

背景

国际上已认识到,建设卫生服务领域的研究能力对于为政策和实践决策提供可靠的证据基础至关重要。旨在提高实践领域内及通过实践开展研究的能力的活动包括支持个人和团队、组织及网络的举措。关于如何衡量研究能力建设(RCB)的有效性,目前讨论和得出的结论较少。

讨论

本文试图展开关于衡量RCB的辩论。它强调,在同行评审期刊上发表论文和成功获得资助等传统成果可能是重要的衡量成果,但它们可能无法解决所有突出进展的相关问题,尤其是对于新手研究人员而言。它们没有涵盖有助于营造支持能力发展环境的因素,也未涉及衡量研究的实用性或“社会影响”以及专业成果。本文基于RCB的六项原则提出了一个规划变革和衡量进展的框架,这些原则是通过对文献、政策文件、实证研究以及英国一个研发支持单位的经验进行分析得出的。这些原则是,RCB应:培养技能和信心、支持联系与伙伴关系、确保研究“贴近实践”、开展适当的传播、投资基础设施以及构建可持续性和连续性要素。建议每项原则在个人、团队、组织和超组织层面发挥作用。还给出了一些衡量进展的标准。

总结

本文强调了确定衡量RCB方法的必要性。它指出了文献中现有衡量方法的局限性,并提出了一个衡量进展的框架,该框架可能构成比较RCB活动的基础。通过这种方式,它有助于确定这些干预措施的有效性,并建立一个知识库以为RCB科学提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69c/1289281/817173384343/1471-2296-6-44-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验