Hasselt University, Patient Safety Group, Agoralaan, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Sep;21(9):760-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-051607.
To measure patient safety culture in Belgian hospitals and to examine the homogeneous grouping of underlying safety culture dimensions.
The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was distributed organisation-wide in 180 Belgian hospitals participating in the federal program on quality and safety between 2007 and 2009. Participating hospitals were invited to submit their data to a comparative database. Homogeneous groups of underlying safety culture dimensions were sought by hierarchical cluster analysis.
90 acute, 42 psychiatric and 11 long-term care hospitals submitted their data for comparison to other hospitals. The benchmark database included 55 225 completed questionnaires (53.7% response rate). Overall dimensional scores were low, although scores were found to be higher for psychiatric and long-term care hospitals than for acute hospitals. The overall perception of patient safety was lower in French-speaking hospitals. Hierarchical clustering of dimensions resulted in two distinct clusters. Cluster I grouped supervisor/manager expectations and actions promoting safety, organisational learning-continuous improvement, teamwork within units and communication openness, while Cluster II included feedback and communication about error, overall perceptions of patient safety, non-punitive response to error, frequency of events reported, teamwork across units, handoffs and transitions, staffing and management support for patient safety.
The nationwide safety culture assessment confirms the need for a long-term national initiative to improve patient safety culture and provides each hospital with a baseline patient safety culture profile to direct an intervention plan. The identification of clusters of safety culture dimensions indicates the need for a different approach and context towards the implementation of interventions aimed at improving the safety culture. Certain clusters require unit level improvements, whereas others demand a hospital-wide policy.
测量比利时医院的患者安全文化,并检验潜在安全文化维度的同质分组。
2007 年至 2009 年期间,在参与联邦质量和安全计划的 180 家比利时医院内,医院患者安全文化调查在整个组织范围内分发。邀请参与的医院将其数据提交到一个比较数据库。通过层次聚类分析寻求潜在安全文化维度的同质分组。
90 家急性医院、42 家精神病医院和 11 家长期护理医院提交了数据,与其他医院进行比较。基准数据库包括 55225 份完成的问卷(53.7%的应答率)。尽管精神病医院和长期护理医院的总体维度得分高于急性医院,但总体患者安全感知得分较低。法语医院的患者安全总体感知较低。维度的层次聚类产生了两个截然不同的集群。集群 I 包括主管/经理对安全的期望和促进安全的行动、组织学习-持续改进、单位内的团队合作和沟通开放性,而集群 II 包括关于错误的反馈和沟通、对患者安全的总体感知、对错误的非惩罚性反应、报告事件的频率、跨单位的团队合作、交接班和过渡、人员配备和管理对患者安全的支持。
全国范围内的安全文化评估证实需要开展长期的国家倡议,以改善患者安全文化,并为每家医院提供基线患者安全文化概况,以指导干预计划。安全文化维度聚类的识别表明需要针对旨在改善安全文化的干预措施采取不同的方法和背景。某些集群需要单元级别的改进,而其他集群则需要医院范围内的政策。