Challinor Alexander, Bifarin Oladayo, Khedmati Morasae Esmaeil, Saini Pooja, Berzins Kathryn, Nathan Rajan
Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;31(4):e70080. doi: 10.1111/jep.70080.
Despite the growth of knowledge and interest into safety and quality in healthcare more generally, the exploration in mental healthcare has been deemed to be in a narrow isolated 'world of its own'. It is possible that relatively little attention is being paid to the processes and interdependencies within the mental health patient safety system. This may result in simplistic static measures of what the system/organisation has, not what it does (or doesn't do). This can limit the potential for learning and affecting change. To investigate systems thinking in mental health patient safety, we conducted a narrative review into the extent of evidence streams supporting systems and complexity thinking approaches. We sourced a total of 89 reports for analysis with six themes identified. These themes included studies evaluating patient safety events that have occurred within mental healthcare, research that has investigated components of the safety system, and studies that have investigated how patient safety incidents are responded to, investigated, and learned from. The review evaluated the use of systems thinking and complexity research in patient safety, and research encapsulating patient and carer involvement. Most research has focused on the analysis of historic approaches to incident investigation and on system-based factors of patient safety, with little attention being paid to systems and complexity thinking approaches. The relationships between components were often ignored in the non-systemic studies sourced, with relationships between components not investigated and unknown. With policymakers recommending changes in patient safety practice through system-based approaches, it is important that its implementation is evaluated robustly with consideration of the multiple levels of the healthcare system. Future research should aim to incorporate systems-thinking approaches to model the safety system, and to improve our understanding of the highly interconnected technical and social entities that dynamically produce emergent behaviour across the system.
尽管总体上人们对医疗保健中的安全与质量的知识和兴趣有所增长,但精神卫生保健领域的探索却被认为处于一个狭隘孤立的“自成一体的世界”。有可能对精神卫生患者安全系统内部的流程和相互依存关系关注相对较少。这可能导致对系统/组织所拥有的东西采取简单化的静态衡量方式,而不是对其实际所做(或未做)之事的衡量。这会限制学习和影响变革的潜力。为了研究精神卫生患者安全中的系统思维,我们对支持系统和复杂性思维方法的证据流范围进行了叙述性综述。我们总共获取了89份报告进行分析,并确定了六个主题。这些主题包括评估精神卫生保健中发生的患者安全事件的研究、调查安全系统组成部分的研究,以及调查如何应对、调查和从中吸取患者安全事件教训的研究。该综述评估了系统思维和复杂性研究在患者安全中的应用,以及涵盖患者和护理人员参与情况的研究。大多数研究都集中在对事件调查的历史方法分析以及患者安全的基于系统的因素上,而对系统和复杂性思维方法关注甚少。在所获取的非系统性研究中,各组成部分之间的关系往往被忽视,各组成部分之间的关系未被调查且未知。由于政策制定者建议通过基于系统的方法改变患者安全实践,因此在考虑医疗保健系统的多个层面的情况下,对其实施进行有力评估非常重要。未来的研究应旨在纳入系统思维方法来构建安全系统模型,并增进我们对在整个系统中动态产生突发行为的高度相互关联的技术和社会实体的理解。