Fayad Ziad Y, Semaan Elie, Fahoum Bashar, Briggs Matt, Tortolani Anthony, D'Ayala Marcus
Department of Surgery, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;27(3):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
Aortic mural thrombus in a nonaneurysmal minimally atherosclerotic or normal aorta is a rare clinical entity and an uncommon cause of peripheral arterial embolization. Both anticoagulation therapy and aortic surgery are commonly used as primary treatment, but there are no consensuses or clinical guidelines to outline the best management strategy for this unusual problem. This systematic review compares the outcomes of these different strategies for the treatment of aortic mural thrombus.
An extensive search of the literature was conducted, and all relevant publications were reviewed, with individual patient data pooled in this meta-analysis. The outcome variables included were persistence or recurrence of aortic thrombus, recurrence of peripheral embolization, mortality, and a composite end point of complications consisting of stroke, limb loss, and bowel resection. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare groups and to find any predictors of adverse outcome.
Two hundred patients from 98 articles were considered. Of these, 112 patients received anticoagulation and 88 underwent aortic surgery as primary treatment. Smoking was more prevalent in the surgery group, but no other significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or mode of presentation were seen between groups. The surgery group was more likely to have aortic thrombus located in the arch, but there were no differences in terms of the mobility or size of the thrombus between groups. Aortic thrombus persisted or recurred in 26.4% of the anticoagulation group and in 5.7% of the surgery group (P < 0.001). Recurrence of peripheral arterial embolization was seen in 25.7% of the anticoagulation group and 9.1% of the surgery group (P = 0.003). Mortality rates were similar at 6.2% and 5.7% for the anticoagulation group and the surgery group, respectively (P = 0.879). Complications were noted in 27% of the anticoagulation group and 17% of the surgery group (P = 0.07), and major limb amputation rates were 9% for the anticoagulation group and 2% for the surgery group (P = 0.004). Logistic regression analysis established thrombus location in the ascending aorta (odds ratio [OR]: 12.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-238.8) or arch (OR: 18.3; 95% CI: 2.6-376.7), mild atherosclerosis of the aortic wall (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1-6.4), and stroke presentation (OR: 11.8; 95% CI: 3.3-49.5) as important predictors of recurrence.
The results of our meta-analysis seem to favor the surgical management of aortic mural thrombus in the normal or minimally diseased aorta. Anticoagulation as primary therapy is associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence, a trend toward a higher incidence of complications, and a higher incidence of limb loss. Aortic surgery should be considered as primary treatment, particularly for those patients at high risk for recurrence considered to be good operative candidates.
非动脉瘤性轻度动脉粥样硬化或正常主动脉中的主动脉壁血栓是一种罕见的临床病症,也是外周动脉栓塞的不常见原因。抗凝治疗和主动脉手术均常用作主要治疗方法,但对于这个特殊问题,尚无共识或临床指南来概述最佳管理策略。本系统评价比较了这些不同策略治疗主动脉壁血栓的结果。
对文献进行了广泛检索,并对所有相关出版物进行了综述,将个体患者数据汇总到本荟萃分析中。纳入的结局变量包括主动脉血栓的持续存在或复发、外周栓塞的复发、死亡率以及由中风、肢体缺失和肠切除组成的并发症复合终点。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析比较组间差异,并找出不良结局的任何预测因素。
考虑了来自98篇文章的200例患者。其中,112例患者接受抗凝治疗,88例接受主动脉手术作为主要治疗。手术组吸烟更为普遍,但两组在人口统计学、合并症或表现方式方面无其他显著差异。手术组主动脉血栓更可能位于弓部,但两组在血栓的活动度或大小方面无差异。抗凝组中26.4%的患者主动脉血栓持续存在或复发,手术组为5.7%(P<0.001)。外周动脉栓塞复发率在抗凝组为25.7%,手术组为9.1%(P=0.003)。抗凝组和手术组的死亡率分别为6.2%和5.7%,相似(P=0.879)。抗凝组27%的患者出现并发症,手术组为17%(P=0.07),抗凝组大肢体截肢率为9%,手术组为2%(P=0.004)。逻辑回归分析确定升主动脉(比值比[OR]:12.7;95%置信区间[CI]:2.3-238.8)或弓部(OR:18.3;95%CI:2.6-376.7)的血栓位置、主动脉壁轻度动脉粥样硬化(OR:2.5;95%CI:1-6.4)和中风表现(OR:11.8;95%CI:3.3-49.5)是复发的重要预测因素。
我们的荟萃分析结果似乎支持对正常或轻度病变主动脉中的主动脉壁血栓进行手术治疗。抗凝作为主要治疗与更高的复发可能性、并发症发生率升高的趋势以及更高的肢体缺失发生率相关。主动脉手术应被视为主要治疗方法,特别是对于那些被认为是良好手术候选者的高复发风险患者。