Suppr超能文献

肺纤维化合并肺气肿的肺部炎症特征。

Characteristics of pulmonary inflammation in combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Sep;125(17):3015-21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The condition of concomitant upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis as identified by computer tomography is known as combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). CPFE has distinct clinical characteristics compared with emphysema alone (EA) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) without emphysema. However, the pulmonary inflammation characteristics of CPFE are not well known, and the differences between CPFE and the other two diseases with regards to pulmonary inflammation need to be explored. The pulmonary inflammatory characteristics were investigated in CPFE patients and compared with EA and IPF.

METHODS

Fraction exhaled nitric oxide (Fe,NO) and differential cell counts, the concentrations of monokine induced by interferon gamma (MIG/CXCL9), interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10/CXCL10), and interferon-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC/CXCL11) were measured in induced sputum obtained from subjects with CPFE (n = 22), EA (n = 22), IPF (n = 14), and healthy volunteers (HV, n = 12). In addition, immunohistochemistry was used to quantify the expression of nitric oxide synthases in alveolar macrophages in 23 lung tissues from patients and control subjects.

RESULTS

The CPFE group had higher alveolar NO than subjects in the EA and HV groups (P = 0.009, P = 0.001, respectively) but not than the IPF group (P > 0.05). Numbers of sputum eosinophils were significantly elevated in CPFE and IPF groups compared with the HV group (P = 0.001, P = 0.008). In contrast, eosinophil counts in EA group did not differ from those in the HV group. Compared with the EA and HV groups, the CPFE group had a lower concentration of I-TAC/CXCL11 in sputum supernatants (P = 0.003, P = 0.004). Immunoreactivity for inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) was higher in the CPFE group than in the EA group (P = 0.018, P = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The pulmonary inflammation of CPFE group is more similar to IPF group, while the distal airway inflammation is more significant in CPFE and IPF groups than in EA group. Lung eosinophil cell infiltration and high NOS expression in alveolar macrophage might participate in this pathogenesis.

摘要

背景

计算机断层扫描(CT)检查发现同时存在上肺肺气肿和下肺纤维化的情况被称为合并性肺纤维化和肺气肿(CPFE)。CPFE 与单纯性肺气肿(EA)和无肺气肿的特发性肺纤维化(IPF)相比具有明显不同的临床特征。然而,CPFE 的肺部炎症特征尚不清楚,需要探讨 CPFE 与其他两种无肺气肿的肺部炎症疾病之间的差异。本研究调查了 CPFE 患者的肺部炎症特征,并与 EA 和 IPF 进行了比较。

方法

检测 CPFE 患者(n = 22)、EA 患者(n = 22)、IPF 患者(n = 14)和健康志愿者(HV,n = 12)诱导痰中呼出气一氧化氮(Fe,NO)和差异细胞计数、干扰素γ诱导的单核细胞趋化因子(MIG/CXCL9)、干扰素诱导蛋白 10(IP-10/CXCL10)和干扰素诱导 T 细胞α趋化因子(I-TAC/CXCL11)的浓度。此外,对 23 例患者和对照组的肺组织进行了肺泡巨噬细胞中一氧化氮合酶的免疫组织化学定量。

结果

CPFE 组的肺泡 NO 高于 EA 组和 HV 组(P = 0.009,P = 0.001),但与 IPF 组无差异(P > 0.05)。CPFE 和 IPF 组痰液中的嗜酸性粒细胞数明显高于 HV 组(P = 0.001,P = 0.008)。相比之下,EA 组的嗜酸性粒细胞计数与 HV 组无差异。与 EA 和 HV 组相比,CPFE 组痰液上清液中的 I-TAC/CXCL11 浓度较低(P = 0.003,P = 0.004)。CPFE 组诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)的免疫反应性高于 EA 组(P = 0.018,P = 0.006)。

结论

CPFE 组的肺部炎症更类似于 IPF 组,而 CPFE 和 IPF 组的远端气道炎症比 EA 组更明显。肺嗜酸性粒细胞浸润和肺泡巨噬细胞中高表达 NOS 可能参与了这一发病机制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验