• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

透明质酸或皮质类固醇注射治疗肩峰下撞击症患者的疗效:一项三臂随机对照试验。

The effectiveness of injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid in patients with subacromial impingement: a three-arm randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Penning L I F, de Bie R A, Walenkamp G H I M

机构信息

Maastricht University Medical Centre Research School CAPHRI, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1246-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750
PMID:22933498
Abstract

A total of 159 patients (84 women and 75 men, mean age of 53 (20 to 87)) with subacromial impingement were randomised to treatment with subacromial injections using lidocaine with one of hyaluronic acid (51 patients), corticosteroid (53 patients) or placebo (55 patients). Patients were followed up for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was pain on a visual analogue score (VAS), and secondary outcomes included the Constant Murley score, shoulder pain score, functional mobility score, shoulder disability questionnaire and pain-specific disability score. The different outcome measures showed similar results. After three, six and 12 weeks corticosteroid injections were superior to hyaluronic acid injections and only at six weeks significantly better than placebo injections. The mean short-term reduction in pain on the VAS score at 12 weeks was 7% (SD 2.7; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.207 to 1.55; p = 0.084) in the hyaluronic acid group, 28% (SD 2.8; 97.5% CI 1.86 to 3.65; p < 0.001) in the corticosteroid group and 23% (SD 3.23; 97.5% CI 1.25 to 3.26; p < 0.001) in the placebo group. At 26 weeks there was a reduction in pain in 63% (32 of 51) of patients in the hyaluronic acid group, 72% (38 of 53) of those in the corticosteroid group and 69% (38 of 55) of those in the placebo group. We were not able to show a convincing benefit from hyaluronic acid injections compared with corticosteroid or placebo injections. Corticosteroid injections produced a significant reduction in pain in the short term (three to 12 weeks), but in the long term the placebo injection produced the best results.

摘要

共有159例肩峰下撞击综合征患者(84例女性,75例男性,平均年龄53岁(20至87岁))被随机分为三组,分别接受含透明质酸的利多卡因肩峰下注射治疗(51例患者)、皮质类固醇注射治疗(53例患者)或安慰剂注射治疗(55例患者)。对患者进行了26周的随访。主要结局指标为视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分,次要结局指标包括Constant Murley评分、肩部疼痛评分、功能活动评分、肩部残疾问卷和疼痛特异性残疾评分。不同的结局指标显示出相似的结果。在3周、6周和12周时,皮质类固醇注射优于透明质酸注射,且仅在6周时显著优于安慰剂注射。透明质酸组在12周时VAS评分的平均短期疼痛减轻为7%(标准差2.7;97.5%置信区间(CI)0.207至1.55;p = 0.084),皮质类固醇组为28%(标准差2.8;97.5%CI 1.86至3.65;p < 0.001),安慰剂组为23%(标准差3.23;97.5%CI 1.25至3.26;p < 0.001)。在26周时,透明质酸组63%(51例中的32例)的患者疼痛减轻,皮质类固醇组72%(53例中的38例)的患者疼痛减轻,安慰剂组69%(55例中的38例)的患者疼痛减轻。与皮质类固醇或安慰剂注射相比,我们未能证明透明质酸注射有令人信服的益处。皮质类固醇注射在短期内(3至12周)能显著减轻疼痛,但从长期来看,安慰剂注射效果最佳。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of injections of hyaluronic acid or corticosteroid in patients with subacromial impingement: a three-arm randomised controlled trial.透明质酸或皮质类固醇注射治疗肩峰下撞击症患者的疗效:一项三臂随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Sep;94(9):1246-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B9.28750.
2
Subacromial triamcinolone acetonide, hyaluronic acid and saline injections for shoulder pain an RCT investigating the effectiveness in the first days.肩峰下注射曲安奈德、透明质酸和生理盐水治疗肩部疼痛:一项关于首日疗效的随机对照试验
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 23;15:352. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-352.
3
Subacromial injections of corticosteroids and xylocaine for painful subacromial impingement syndrome.肩峰下注射皮质类固醇和利多卡因治疗疼痛性肩峰下撞击综合征。
Chang Gung Med J. 2006 Sep-Oct;29(5):474-9.
4
Hylan versus corticosteroid versus placebo for treatment of basal joint arthritis: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial.透明质烷与皮质类固醇及安慰剂治疗拇指腕掌关节关节炎的前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Jan;33(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.10.009.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Blind Subacromial Corticosteroid Injections for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.超声引导与盲法肩峰下皮质类固醇注射治疗肩峰下撞击综合征:一项随机双盲临床试验
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):702-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546515618653. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
6
A double-blind randomised controlled study comparing subacromial injection of tenoxicam or methylprednisolone in patients with subacromial impingement.一项比较在肩峰下撞击症患者中肩峰下注射替诺昔康或甲基强的松龙的双盲随机对照研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Jan;92(1):77-82. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22137.
7
[The contribution of subacromial injection to the conservative treatment of impingement syndrome].[肩峰下注射在撞击综合征保守治疗中的作用]
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009 Aug-Oct;43(4):331-5. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2009.331.
8
Does hyaluronate injection work in shoulder disease in early stage? A multicenter, randomized, single blind and open comparative clinical study.透明质酸钠关节腔注射治疗早期肩袖疾病的多中心随机单盲开放临床对比研究
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jun;21(6):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.11.009. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
9
Comparative outcomes of combined corticosteroid with low volume compared to high volume of local anesthetic in subacromial injection for impingement syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.肩峰下注射皮质类固醇联合小剂量与大剂量局部麻醉药治疗撞击综合征的比较结果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Apr;28(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2056-z. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
10
[Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided subacromial drug injection in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome].超声引导下肩峰下药物注射治疗肩峰下撞击综合征的临床疗效
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Oct 1;56(10):781-785. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.10.016.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of high-intensity laser therapy on supraspinatus tendon elasticity in subacromial impingement syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled study.高强度激光疗法对肩峰下撞击综合征中冈上肌腱弹性的影响:一项双盲随机对照研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Aug 19;40(1):337. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04582-w.
2
A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing the Efficacy of Electrotherapy to Ultrasound - Guided Intra-Articular Steroid Injections for Frozen Shoulder.一项比较电疗法与超声引导下关节内注射类固醇治疗肩周炎疗效的前瞻性随机研究。
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Aug;15(8):332-339. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i08.5986.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Subacromial Injections With Hyaluronic Acid for the Treatment of Tendinopathies and Partial Supraspinatus Tears.
透明质酸肩峰下注射治疗肌腱病和冈上肌部分撕裂的临床疗效
Cureus. 2025 Apr 16;17(4):e82376. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82376. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Current evidence on hyaluronic acid injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A scoping review.透明质酸注射治疗肩袖肌腱病的现有证据:一项范围综述。
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Mar 13:17585732251324484. doi: 10.1177/17585732251324484.
5
Efficacy of Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.经皮脉冲射频治疗肩峰下撞击综合征的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 7;13(23):7462. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237462.
6
Efficacy comparison between acupuncture and other modalities in the treatment of rotator cuff diseases: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针刺与其他疗法治疗肩袖疾病的疗效比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):599-616. doi: 10.62347/NCRJ1270. eCollection 2024.
7
Effect of the Critical Shoulder Angle on the Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection for Subacromial Bursitis.临界肩角对超声引导下类固醇注射治疗肩峰下滑囊炎疗效的影响。
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 9;12(11):1879. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111879.
8
A Targeted Approach to Post-Mastectomy Pain and Persistent Pain following Breast Cancer Treatment.一种针对乳腺癌治疗后乳房切除术后疼痛和持续性疼痛的靶向治疗方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 16;13(20):5191. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205191.
9
Progressive exercise compared with best-practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for rotator cuff disorders: the GRASP factorial RCT.渐进性锻炼与最佳实践建议比较,有无皮质类固醇注射,用于肩袖疾病:GRASP 析因 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Aug;25(48):1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta25480.
10
How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.如何评估肩部功能:对现有经过验证的结局指标的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 8;11(5):845. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050845.