• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汉语次字符成分的词汇加工:Stroop 效应揭示的声旁语义激活

Lexical processing of Chinese sub-character components: Semantic activation of phonetic radicals as revealed by the Stroop effect.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 17;7(1):15782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15536-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-15536-w
PMID:29150618
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5693949/
Abstract

Most Chinese characters are compounds consisting of a semantic radical indicating semantic category and a phonetic radical cuing the pronunciation of the character. Controversy surrounds whether radicals also go through the same lexical processing as characters and, critically, whether phonetic radicals involve semantic activation since they can also be characters when standing alone. Here we examined these issues using the Stroop task whereby participants responded to the ink color of the character. The key finding was that Stroop effects were found when the character itself had a meaning unrelated to color, but contained a color name phonetic radical (e.g., "guess", with the phonetic radical "cyan", on the right) or had a meaning associated with color (e.g., "pity", with the phonetic radical "blood" on the right which has a meaning related to "red"). Such Stroop effects from the phonetic radical within a character unrelated to color support that Chinese character recognition involves decomposition of characters into their constituent radicals; with each of their meanings including phonetic radicals activated independently, even though it would inevitably interfere with that of the whole character. Compared with the morphological decomposition in English whereby the semantics of the morphemes are not necessarily activated, the unavoidable semantic activation of phonetic radicals represents a unique feature in Chinese character processing.

摘要

大多数汉字都是由一个表示语义类别的语义偏旁和一个提示汉字发音的声旁组成的。偏旁是否也像汉字一样经历相同的词汇处理,以及声旁是否涉及语义激活,这是有争议的,因为它们单独存在时也可以是汉字。在这里,我们使用斯特鲁普任务来研究这些问题,参与者需要对汉字的墨迹颜色做出反应。关键发现是,当汉字本身的意思与颜色无关,但包含一个颜色名称的声旁(例如,“猜”,右边的声旁是“青”)或与颜色有关的意思(例如,“怜悯”,右边的声旁是“血”,与“红色”有关)时,就会出现斯特鲁普效应。这种来自与颜色无关的汉字内部声旁的斯特鲁普效应支持汉字识别涉及到将汉字分解成其组成的偏旁;每个偏旁的意思都包括独立激活的声旁,尽管这不可避免地会干扰整个汉字的意思。与英语中的形态分解不同,英语中词素的语义不一定被激活,声旁不可避免的语义激活代表了汉字处理的一个独特特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe2/5693949/472c0a1b1409/41598_2017_15536_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe2/5693949/b531f068d246/41598_2017_15536_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe2/5693949/472c0a1b1409/41598_2017_15536_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe2/5693949/b531f068d246/41598_2017_15536_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fe2/5693949/472c0a1b1409/41598_2017_15536_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lexical processing of Chinese sub-character components: Semantic activation of phonetic radicals as revealed by the Stroop effect.汉语次字符成分的词汇加工:Stroop 效应揭示的声旁语义激活
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 17;7(1):15782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15536-w.
2
Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study.汉字和假字加工的脑机制比较:一项事件相关电位研究。
Int J Psychol. 2010 Apr 1;45(2):102-10. doi: 10.1080/00207590903156439.
3
The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: an event-related potential study.汉语次词汇加工中语义和语音激活的时间特征:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2006 Nov 22;1121(1):150-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.117. Epub 2006 Oct 2.
4
Analysis of a Chinese phonetic compound database: implications for orthographic processing.一个汉语复合词数据库的分析:对正字法加工的启示
J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 Sep;35(5):405-26. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9022-y.
5
Orthographic learning via self-teaching in Chinese: The roles of phonological recoding, context, and phonetic and semantic radicals.汉字正字法自学:语音转写、语境及声符和意符的作用。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov;199:104913. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104913. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
6
Semantic Radical Activation in Chinese Phonogram Recognition: Evidence from Event-Related Potential Recording.基于事件相关电位记录的声旁语义激活在汉字识别中的作用
Neuroscience. 2019 Oct 1;417:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
7
A Stroop effect emerges in the processing of complex Chinese characters that contain a color-related radical.在处理包含与颜色相关部首的复杂汉字时会出现斯特鲁普效应。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0553-9.
8
Functional orthographic units in Chinese character reading: Are there abstract radical identities?中文阅读中的功能正字单位:是否存在抽象的部首身份?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Apr;28(2):610-623. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01828-2. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
From orthography to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing meaning of Chinese single-character words.从正字法到意义:语音在汉字单字词意义获取中的作用的电生理学研究。
Neuroscience. 2010 Jan 13;165(1):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.070. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
10
Phonological, not semantic, activation dominates Chinese character recognition: Evidence from a visual world eye-tracking study.语音而非语义激活主导汉字识别:来自视觉世界眼动追踪研究的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):617-628. doi: 10.1177/1747021819887956. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The "Dogs' Catching Mice" conjecture in Chinese phonogram processing.中文语音处理中的“狗拿耗子”猜想
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0324848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324848. eCollection 2025.
2
Distinct components of Stroop interference and facilitation: The role of phonology and response modality.斯特鲁普干扰与促进的不同成分:语音学和反应方式的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):997-1015. doi: 10.1177/17470218241302490. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
3
Icono: a universal language that shows what it says.图标:一种能表意的通用语言。

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.区分阅读中真正的语义斯特鲁普效应与偶然效应:论两个中性基线的必要性。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 17;7:386. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00386. eCollection 2016.
2
The effect of orthographic and emotional neighbourhood in a colour categorization task.正字法和情感邻域在颜色分类任务中的作用。
Cogn Process. 2016 Feb;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0742-5. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
3
Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the multiple problems of multiplicity-whether and how to correct for many statistical tests.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 28;14:1149381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149381. eCollection 2023.
4
Exploring the neurobiology of Merge at a basic level: insights from a novel artificial grammar paradigm.从基础层面探索融合的神经生物学:来自一种新型人工语法范式的见解。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 23;14:1151518. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1151518. eCollection 2023.
5
Linguistic distances between native languages and Chinese influence acquisition of Chinese character, vocabulary, and grammar.母语与中文之间的语言距离会影响汉字、词汇和语法的习得。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 13;13:1083574. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1083574. eCollection 2022.
6
A Comparative Study of Three Measurement Methods of Chinese Character Recognition for L2 Chinese Learners.二语汉语学习者汉字识别三种测量方法的比较研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:753913. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.753913. eCollection 2022.
最佳(但常被遗忘)实践:多重性的多个问题——是否以及如何纠正多个统计检验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;102(4):721-8. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.113548. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
4
A Stroop effect emerges in the processing of complex Chinese characters that contain a color-related radical.在处理包含与颜色相关部首的复杂汉字时会出现斯特鲁普效应。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0553-9.
5
Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.在Stroop范式中,沿着GPC次词汇和正字法-词汇阅读路径无意激活词汇和语义表征。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):623-44. doi: 10.1037/a0035154. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Spatial Stroop interference occurs in the processing of radicals of ideogrammic compounds.空间斯特鲁普干扰发生在表意文字复合字部首的加工过程中。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Jun;21(3):715-20. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0533-x.
7
Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.“CORNER”和“BROTHER”在形态上复杂吗?从长远来看并非如此。
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
8
Suggestion does not de-automatize word reading: evidence from the semantically based Stroop task.建议不会使单词阅读自动化:基于语义的 Stroop 任务的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):521-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0217-y.
9
Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: a violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.早期的形态加工是形态语义的,而不仅仅是形态正字法的:这违背了单词识别中形式先于意义的观点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):684-91. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.684.
10
Stroop dilution depends on the nature of the color carrier but not on its location.斯特鲁普效应的稀释取决于颜色载体的性质,而非其位置。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):826-39. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.826.