• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PELICAN:一种儿童哮喘生活质量评估工具:荷兰初级保健和专科保健中两项随机对照试验的研究方案。

PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-12-137
PMID:22935133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3512535/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma is one of the major chronic health problems in children in the Netherlands. The Pelican is a paediatric asthma-related quality of life instrument for children with asthma from 6-11 years old, which is suitable for clinical practice in primary and specialized care. Based on this instrument, we developed a self-management treatment to improve asthma-related quality of life. The Pelican intervention will be investigated in different health care settings. Results of intervention studies are often extrapolated to other health care settings than originally investigated. Because of differences in organization, disease severity, patient characteristics and care provision between health care settings, extrapolating research results could lead to unnecessary health costs without the desired health care achievements. Therefore, interventions have to be investigated in different health care settings when possible. This study is an example of an intervention study in different health care settings. In this article, we will present the study protocol of the Pelican study in primary and specialized care.

METHOD/DESIGN: This study consists of two randomized controlled trials to assess the effectiveness of the Pelican intervention in primary and specialized care. The trial in primary care is a multilevel design with 170 children with asthma in 16 general practices. All children in one general practices are allocated to the same treatment group. The trial in specialized care is a multicentre trial with 100 children with asthma. Children in one outpatient clinic are randomly allocated to the intervention or usual care group. In both trials, children will visit the care provider four times during a follow-up of nine months. This study is registered and ethically approved.

DISCUSSION

This article describes the study protocol of the Pelican study in different health care settings. If the Pelican intervention proves to be effective and efficient, implementation in primary and specialized care for paediatric asthma in the Netherlands will be recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered by clinicaltrial.gov (NCT01109745).

摘要

背景

哮喘是荷兰儿童的主要慢性健康问题之一。Pelican 是一种针对 6-11 岁哮喘儿童的与哮喘相关的生活质量工具,适用于初级保健和专科护理的临床实践。在此基础上,我们开发了一种自我管理治疗方法来改善哮喘相关的生活质量。Pelican 干预措施将在不同的医疗保健环境中进行研究。干预研究的结果通常会外推到与最初研究不同的其他医疗保健环境中。由于医疗保健环境之间在组织、疾病严重程度、患者特征和护理提供方面存在差异,因此外推研究结果可能会导致不必要的医疗费用,而无法实现预期的医疗保健效果。因此,在可能的情况下,干预措施应在不同的医疗保健环境中进行研究。本研究就是在不同医疗保健环境中进行干预研究的一个范例。在本文中,我们将介绍 Pelican 研究在初级保健和专科保健中的研究方案。

方法/设计:本研究包括两项在初级保健和专科保健中评估 Pelican 干预措施有效性的随机对照试验。初级保健中的试验采用多层次设计,纳入了 16 家普通诊所的 170 名哮喘儿童。同一普通诊所的所有儿童都被分配到相同的治疗组。专科保健中的试验为多中心试验,纳入了 100 名哮喘儿童。一家门诊诊所的儿童随机分配到干预组或常规护理组。在两项试验中,儿童将在 9 个月的随访期间四次就诊于医疗服务提供者。本研究已注册并经伦理批准。

讨论

本文描述了 Pelican 研究在不同医疗保健环境中的研究方案。如果 Pelican 干预措施被证明有效且高效,将建议在荷兰的初级保健和专科保健中实施针对儿科哮喘的 Pelican 干预措施。

试验注册

本研究已在 clinicaltrial.gov(NCT01109745)注册。

相似文献

1
PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands.PELICAN:一种儿童哮喘生活质量评估工具:荷兰初级保健和专科保健中两项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137.
2
Validity, reliability and discriminative capacity of an electronic quality of life instrument (Pelican) for childhood asthma in the Netherlands.荷兰儿童哮喘电子生活质量工具(Pelican)的有效性、可靠性和区分能力。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):927-38. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0533-3. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
Implementation strategies of internet-based asthma self-management support in usual care. Study protocol for the IMPASSE cluster randomized trial.基于互联网的哮喘自我管理支持在常规护理中的实施策略。IMPASSE 集群随机试验研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Nov 21;7:113. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-113.
4
PELICAN: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices to assess a self-management support intervention based on individual goals for children with asthma.鹈鹕研究:荷兰全科医疗中的一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估基于个体目标的哮喘儿童自我管理支持干预措施。
J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):211-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.952439. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
PELICAN: Content evaluation of patient-centered care for children with asthma based on an online tool.鹈鹕:基于在线工具对哮喘患儿以患者为中心的护理进行内容评估。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23397. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Implementation of an intervention to improve the adoption of asthma self-management practices in Peru: Asthma Implementation Research (AIRE) randomized trial study protocol.实施干预措施以提高秘鲁哮喘自我管理实践的采用率:哮喘实施研究(AIRE)随机试验研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 4;21(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4207-5.
7
(Cost)-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention for adults with epilepsy: study protocol of a Dutch randomized controlled trial (ZMILE study).针对成年癫痫患者的多组分干预措施的(成本)效益:一项荷兰随机对照试验的研究方案(ZMILE研究)
BMC Neurol. 2014 Dec 24;14:255. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0255-3.
8
A Randomized trial of an Asthma Internet Self-management Intervention (RAISIN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项哮喘互联网自我管理干预随机试验(RAISIN):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 May 24;15:185. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-185.
9
Partner randomized controlled trial: study protocol and coaching intervention.合作方随机对照试验:研究方案和辅导干预。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Apr 2;12:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-42.
10
The CareWell-primary care program: design of a cluster controlled trial and process evaluation of a complex intervention targeting community-dwelling frail elderly.关爱健康初级保健项目:一项以社区居住的虚弱老年人为目标的复杂干预措施的集群对照试验设计和过程评估。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-115.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocolled practice nurse-led care for children with asthma in primary care: protocol for a cluster randomised trial.初级保健中由执业护士主导的哮喘儿童标准化护理:一项整群随机试验方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 27;9(9):e022922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022922.
2
The effect of goal setting in asthma self-management education: A systematic review.目标设定在哮喘自我管理教育中的作用:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Apr 20;6(3):334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.04.003. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
An exploration of parent-child dyadic asthma management influences on quality of life.探索亲子二元哮喘管理对生活质量的影响。
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2015 Jun;38(2):85-104. doi: 10.3109/01460862.2015.1017668. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
5
Validity, reliability and discriminative capacity of an electronic quality of life instrument (Pelican) for childhood asthma in the Netherlands.荷兰儿童哮喘电子生活质量工具(Pelican)的有效性、可靠性和区分能力。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):927-38. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0533-3. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
The importance of primary care research in the management of respiratory disease.初级保健研究在呼吸系统疾病管理中的重要性。
Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Mar;21(1):1-3. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00015.
2
Child and caregiver involvement and shared decision-making during asthma pediatric visits.儿童及照料者在小儿哮喘就诊过程中的参与及共同决策。
J Asthma. 2011 Dec;48(10):1022-31. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.626482. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
3
[Complaints and illnesses in children in the Netherlands].[荷兰儿童的投诉与疾病]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(35):A3464.
4
Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions.常规和非常规护理:行为干预随机对照试验中的现有实践对照组。
Psychosom Med. 2011 May;73(4):323-35. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318218e1fb. Epub 2011 May 2.
5
Paediatric asthma outpatient care by asthma nurse, paediatrician or general practitioner: randomised controlled trial with two-year follow-up.由哮喘护士、儿科医生或全科医生提供的儿科哮喘门诊护理:为期两年随访的随机对照试验。
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Mar;20(1):84-91. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00003.
6
How does asthma influence the daily life of children? Results of focus group interviews.哮喘如何影响儿童的日常生活?焦点小组访谈的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 14;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-5.
7
Children with asthma on inhaled corticosteroids managed in general practice or by hospital paediatricians: is there a difference?在全科医疗或由医院儿科医生管理的接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗的哮喘儿童:有差异吗?
Prim Care Respir J. 2010 Mar;19(1):62-7, 8p following 67. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00063.
8
Is the prevalence of asthma declining? Systematic review of epidemiological studies.哮喘的患病率是否在下降?系统评价流行病学研究。
Allergy. 2010 Feb;65(2):152-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02244.x. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
9
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.开发与评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
10
The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial.霍桑效应:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 3;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-30.