• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鹈鹕研究:荷兰全科医疗中的一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估基于个体目标的哮喘儿童自我管理支持干预措施。

PELICAN: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices to assess a self-management support intervention based on individual goals for children with asthma.

作者信息

van Bragt Stephanie, van den Bemt Lisette, Kievits Regien, Merkus Peter, van Weel Chris, Schermer Tjard

机构信息

Department of Primary and Community Care , Radboudumc, Nijmegen , The Netherlands .

出版信息

J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):211-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.952439. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

DOI:10.3109/02770903.2014.952439
PMID:25166455
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Insufficient asthma management leads to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQL). The aim of this study is to assess whether individualized self-management (ISM) support will improve HRQL in children with asthma compared to enhanced usual care (EUC) in Dutch general practices.

METHODS

A cluster-randomized controlled trial with 9-month follow-up. ISM is a nurse-led intervention that is optimized to the needs of children, leading to a written action plan. Power calculation demanded inclusion of 170 children (aged 6-11 years) diagnosed with asthma and active medication use.

RESULTS

Outcomes were HRQL of the child (Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, PAQLQ-s) and several secondary outcomes. Data of 29 children (mean age 8.6 years, SD 1.7) were analyzed; ISM (n = 15) or EUC (n = 14). Logistic regression analysis (minimal clinical important difference; MCID ≥ 0.5) and descriptive analyses were performed. Despite high PAQLQ-s score at baseline (median ISM 6.35, EUC 6.02), a substantial number of subjects from both groups showed MCID of HRQL (ISM 33%, EUC 57%). Treatment differences on HRQL were not significant (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.08, 1.69). Secondary outcomes did not show significant differences either, with exception of PAQLQ-s symptoms domain score in favor of EUC.

CONCLUSION

Due to recruitment problems and underpowered analyses, no firm conclusions on the effectiveness of ISM support for childhood asthma in primary care could be drawn. Still, this study can be considered a valuable pilot study and in the future, there might be better capacity in general practices to commit to such treatment.

摘要

目的

哮喘管理不足会导致健康相关生活质量(HRQL)受损。本研究旨在评估与荷兰全科医疗中的强化常规护理(EUC)相比,个体化自我管理(ISM)支持是否能改善哮喘儿童的HRQL。

方法

一项为期9个月随访的整群随机对照试验。ISM是一项由护士主导的干预措施,根据儿童需求进行优化,形成书面行动计划。样本量计算要求纳入170名6至11岁被诊断为哮喘且正在使用活性药物的儿童。

结果

结局指标为儿童的HRQL(儿童哮喘生活质量问卷,PAQLQ-s)及若干次要结局指标。分析了29名儿童(平均年龄8.6岁,标准差1.7)的数据;其中ISM组(n = 15)和EUC组(n = 14)。进行了逻辑回归分析(最小临床重要差异;MCID≥0.5)和描述性分析。尽管两组在基线时PAQLQ-s评分较高(ISM组中位数为6.35,EUC组为6.02),但两组中仍有相当数量的受试者显示出HRQL的MCID(ISM组33%,EUC组57%)。两组在HRQL方面的治疗差异不显著(比值比0.38,95%置信区间0.08,1.69)。次要结局指标也未显示出显著差异,除了PAQLQ-s症状领域评分EUC组更优。

结论

由于招募问题和分析效能不足,无法就ISM支持在基层医疗中治疗儿童哮喘的有效性得出确凿结论。尽管如此,本研究仍可被视为一项有价值的试点研究,未来全科医疗可能有更好的能力开展此类治疗。

相似文献

1
PELICAN: a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Dutch general practices to assess a self-management support intervention based on individual goals for children with asthma.鹈鹕研究:荷兰全科医疗中的一项整群随机对照试验,旨在评估基于个体目标的哮喘儿童自我管理支持干预措施。
J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):211-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.952439. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
2
Effect of the Children and Young People's Health Partnership model of paediatric integrated care on health service use and child health outcomes: a pragmatic two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.儿童和青少年健康伙伴关系模式对儿科综合护理的影响对卫生服务利用和儿童健康结果的影响:一项实用的两臂整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Dec;7(12):830-843. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00216-X. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
PELICAN: A quality of life instrument for childhood asthma: study protocol of two randomized controlled trials in primary and specialized care in the Netherlands.PELICAN:一种儿童哮喘生活质量评估工具:荷兰初级保健和专科保健中两项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Aug 30;12:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-137.
4
Internet-based self-management compared with usual care in adolescents with asthma: a randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的自我管理与青少年哮喘的常规护理相比:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Dec;47(12):1170-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22575. Epub 2012 May 29.
5
Effectiveness of personalized written asthma action plans in the management of children with partly controlled asthma in Trinidad: a randomized controlled trial.特立尼达部分控制哮喘儿童管理中个性化书面哮喘行动计划的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Trop Pediatr. 2014 Feb;60(1):17-26. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmt063. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
6
Does spirometry training in general practice improve quality and outcomes of asthma care?一般实践中的肺量测定训练是否能改善哮喘护理的质量和结果?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Oct;23(5):545-53. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr039. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
7
PELICAN: Content evaluation of patient-centered care for children with asthma based on an online tool.鹈鹕:基于在线工具对哮喘患儿以患者为中心的护理进行内容评估。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):993-1003. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23397. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
[Utilization and clinical validation of the Spanish version of the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) and the Diary for Caregivers of Asthmatic Children (DCA). VALAIR study].[儿童哮喘生活质量问卷(PAQLQ)西班牙语版及哮喘儿童照顾者日记(DCA)的应用与临床验证。VALAIR研究]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 May-Jun;28(3):175-83.
9
A multisite randomized trial of the effects of physician education and organizational change in chronic-asthma care: health outcomes of the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team II Study.一项关于医生教育和组织变革对慢性哮喘护理影响的多中心随机试验:儿科哮喘护理患者结局研究团队II研究的健康结局
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Sep;158(9):875-83. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.9.875.
10
Achieving Good Outcomes for Asthma Living (GOAL): mixed methods feasibility and pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a practical intervention for eliciting, setting and achieving goals for adults with asthma.实现哮喘患者良好生活结局(GOAL):一项混合方法可行性研究及针对成年哮喘患者制定、设定和实现目标的实用干预措施的试点整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2016 Dec 8;17(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1684-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid Concept Analysis of Self-Management Support: School Nurses Supporting Students with Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.自护支持的混合概念分析:学校护士支持患有心因性非癫痫性发作的学生。
J Sch Nurs. 2022 Oct;38(5):428-441. doi: 10.1177/10598405211053506. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Impact of Nurse-Led Asthma Intervention on Child Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review.护士主导的哮喘干预对儿童健康结局的影响:系统评价。
J Sch Nurs. 2022 Feb;38(1):84-97. doi: 10.1177/10598405211003303. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
Comparison between the health-related quality of life of children/adolescents with asthma and that of their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
哮喘患儿/青少年与其照顾者的健康相关生活质量比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Apr 22;46(3):e20190095. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20190095. eCollection 2020.
4
The effect of goal setting in asthma self-management education: A systematic review.目标设定在哮喘自我管理教育中的作用:一项系统评价。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Apr 20;6(3):334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.04.003. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.
5
How can we support children, adolescents and young adults in managing chronic health challenges? A scoping review on the effects of patient education interventions.我们如何支持儿童、青少年和青年在管理慢性健康挑战方面?关于患者教育干预效果的范围综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):849-862. doi: 10.1111/hex.12906. Epub 2019 May 26.
6
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.