• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助口服抗凝治疗的效果。

Effects of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy.

机构信息

University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Thromb J. 2012 Aug 30;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-10-17.

DOI:10.1186/1477-9560-10-17
PMID:22935243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3502261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computer-assistance and self-monitoring lower the cost and may improve the quality of anticoagulation therapy. The main purpose of this clinical investigation was to use computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy to improve the time to reach and the time spent within the therapeutic target range compared to traditional oral anticoagulant therapy by physicians.

METHODS

54 patients were randomized equally into 3 groups. Patients in two groups used CoaguChek® systems to measure international normalized ratio (INR) values and had dosages of anticoagulation treatment calculated in a computer system by an algorithm specific to each group. The third group received traditional anticoagulation treatment by physicians. The obtained INR values were compared regarding the time to reach, and the time spent within, the therapeutic target range, corresponding to INR values from 2 to 3.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to computer-assisted anticoagulation and the CoaguChek® system reached the therapeutic target range after 8 days compared to 14 days by prescriptions from physicians (p = 0.04). Time spent in the therapeutic target range did not differ between groups. The median INR value measured throughout the study from all patients by CoaguChek® at 2.5 (2.42-2.62) was lower than measured by a hospital-based Clinical and Biochemical Laboratory at 2.6 (2.45-2.76), (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic target range was reached faster by the use of computer-assisted anticoagulation treatment than prescribed by physicians, and the total time spent within the therapeutic target range was similar. Thus computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy may reduce the cost of anticoagulation therapy without lowering the quality. INR values measured by CoaguChek® were reliable compared to measurements by a clinical and biochemical laboratory.

摘要

背景

计算机辅助和自我监测可以降低成本,并可能提高抗凝治疗的质量。本临床研究的主要目的是使用计算机辅助口服抗凝治疗,与传统的医生口服抗凝治疗相比,提高达到治疗目标范围的时间和在治疗目标范围内花费的时间。

方法

54 名患者被随机平均分为 3 组。两组患者使用 CoaguChek®系统测量国际标准化比值(INR)值,并通过特定于每组的算法在计算机系统中计算抗凝治疗剂量。第三组患者接受传统的医生抗凝治疗。比较各组获得的 INR 值,以达到治疗目标范围的时间和 INR 值为 2 至 3 时的时间。

结果

随机接受计算机辅助抗凝治疗和 CoaguChek®系统的患者在 8 天内达到治疗目标范围,而医生处方的患者则在 14 天内达到(p=0.04)。两组患者在治疗目标范围内的时间没有差异。所有患者通过 CoaguChek®测量的研究期间的中位数 INR 值为 2.5(2.42-2.62),低于医院临床和生化实验室测量的 2.6(2.45-2.76)(p=0.02)。

结论

与医生处方相比,使用计算机辅助抗凝治疗更快地达到治疗目标范围,并且在治疗目标范围内花费的总时间相似。因此,计算机辅助口服抗凝治疗可以降低抗凝治疗的成本,而不会降低质量。与临床和生化实验室的测量值相比,CoaguChek®测量的 INR 值是可靠的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d5a/3502261/008bd6406390/1477-9560-10-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d5a/3502261/008bd6406390/1477-9560-10-17-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d5a/3502261/008bd6406390/1477-9560-10-17-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of computer-assisted oral anticoagulant therapy.计算机辅助口服抗凝治疗的效果。
Thromb J. 2012 Aug 30;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-10-17.
2
Point-of-Care International Normalized Ratio (INR) Monitoring Devices for Patients on Long-term Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: An Evidence-Based Analysis.长期口服抗凝治疗患者的即时检测国际标准化比值(INR)监测设备:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(12):1-114. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
3
CoaguChek® XS versus standard laboratory prothrombin time for anticoagulant monitoring in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.抗磷脂综合征患者抗凝监测中 CoaguChek® XS 与标准实验室凝血酶原时间的比较。
Lupus. 2022 Apr;31(5):565-574. doi: 10.1177/09612033221086134. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
4
Accuracy of point of care coagulometers compared to reference laboratory measurements in patients on oral anticoagulation therapy.即时凝血仪检测与参考实验室测量在口服抗凝治疗患者中的准确性比较。
Thromb Res. 2016 Apr;140:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
5
Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).儿童口服抗凝治疗的床旁监测。使用国际参考凝血活酶制剂(rTF/95)对CoaguChek XS系统与静脉血国际标准化比值(INR)及静脉血INR进行比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jul;102(1):159-65. doi: 10.1160/TH09-01-0056.
6
Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy.使用CoaguChek XS凝血仪和传统实验室方法测定接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗患者的国际标准化比值(INR)的比较
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2017 Mar;23(2):187-194. doi: 10.1177/1076029615595881. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
7
Comparison of the international normalized ratio levels obtained by portable coagulometer and laboratory in a clinic specializing in oral anticoagulation.便携式凝血仪与实验室检测所得国际标准化比值水平在一家口腔抗凝专科诊所的比较。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2015 Aug;37(4):536-43. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12333. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
8
Point of care monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy in children: comparison of CoaguChek Plus and Thrombotest methods with venous international normalised ratio.儿童口服抗凝治疗的床旁监测:CoaguChek Plus和血栓试验方法与静脉国际标准化比值的比较
Thromb Haemost. 2004 Oct;92(4):734-7. doi: 10.1160/TH04-02-0085.
9
Patient self-testing is a reliable and acceptable alternative to laboratory INR monitoring.患者自我检测是实验室国际标准化比值(INR)监测的一种可靠且可接受的替代方法。
Br J Haematol. 2005 Jan;128(2):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05300.x.
10
Meta-analysis to assess the quality of warfarin control in atrial fibrillation patients in the United States.评估美国心房颤动患者华法林控制质量的荟萃分析。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Apr;15(3):244-52. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.3.244.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of warfarin management strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.华法林管理策略的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 2;74:102712. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102712. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Telemedicine-Based Management of Oral Anticoagulation Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于远程医疗的口服抗凝治疗管理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 10;25:e45922. doi: 10.2196/45922.
3
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacogenetic warfarin dose refinements remain significantly influenced by genetic factors after one week of therapy.华法林剂量的药物遗传学调整在治疗一周后仍然受到遗传因素的显著影响。
Thromb Haemost. 2012 Feb;107(2):232-40. doi: 10.1160/TH11-06-0388. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
2
Dabigatran etexilate versus warfarin in management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in UK context: quantitative benefit-harm and economic analyses.达比加群酯与华法林在英国非瓣膜性心房颤动管理中的比较:定量获益-危害和经济分析。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 31;343:d6333. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6333.
3
Home management of oral anticoagulation via telemedicine versus conventional hospital-based treatment.
美国血液学会 2018 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:抗凝治疗的最佳管理。
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3257-3291. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024893.
4
Self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.口服抗凝治疗的自我监测与自我管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 5;7(7):CD003839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003839.pub3.
5
Is self-monitoring an effective option for people receiving long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy? A systematic review and economic evaluation.自我监测对接受长期维生素K拮抗剂治疗的患者来说是一种有效的选择吗?一项系统评价与经济学评估。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 25;5(6):e007758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007758.
6
Lacunae in patient knowledge about oral anticoagulant treatment: results of a questionnaire survey.患者对抗凝治疗认知的空白:一项问卷调查结果
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2015 Jun;31(2):275-80. doi: 10.1007/s12288-014-0415-z. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Computerized advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice.关于药物剂量的计算机化建议,以改善处方实践。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 12;2013(11):CD002894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002894.pub3.
8
Furthering the reliable and valid measurement of mental health screening, diagnoses, treatment and outcomes through health information technology.通过健康信息技术进一步实现心理健康筛查、诊断、治疗和结果的可靠和有效测量。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Jul-Aug;35(4):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
远程医疗与传统医院为基础的治疗在口服抗凝剂的家庭管理中的比较。
Telemed J E Health. 2011 Apr;17(3):169-76. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0128. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
4
Improving anticoagulation control in hospitalized elderly patients on warfarin.改善华法林治疗的住院老年患者的抗凝控制。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Feb;58(2):242-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02675.x. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
5
Management strategies for optimal control of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation.心房颤动患者抗凝治疗的最佳控制管理策略。
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2009 Sep;35(6):560-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240016. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
6
Anticoagulation intensity and outcomes among patients prescribed oral anticoagulant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受口服抗凝治疗患者的抗凝强度与治疗结果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):235-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080171.
7
Strokes attributable to underuse of warfarin and antiplatelets.因华法林和抗血小板药物使用不足导致的中风。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005 Mar-Apr;14(2):55-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.11.003.
8
Self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy: a review.口服抗凝治疗的自我管理:综述
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Oct;18(2):127-43. doi: 10.1007/s11239-004-0209-5.
9
Anticoagulant-related bleeding in older persons with atrial fibrillation: physicians' fears often unfounded.老年心房颤动患者抗凝相关出血:医生的担忧往往毫无根据。
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 14;163(13):1580-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.13.1580.
10
Mechanical heart valve patients can manage oral anticoagulant therapy themselves.机械心脏瓣膜患者可以自行管理口服抗凝治疗。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00817-5.