Suppr超能文献

远程医疗与传统医院为基础的治疗在口服抗凝剂的家庭管理中的比较。

Home management of oral anticoagulation via telemedicine versus conventional hospital-based treatment.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2011 Apr;17(3):169-76. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0128. Epub 2011 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We have developed an expert computer system for the control of oral anticoagulation therapy, accessible by the patients via their own computer. To investigate if the weekly measurement and dosing of international normalized ratio (INR) at home using the online Internet-based system was superior to conventional treatment, we performed a randomized, controlled trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 669 patients in our anticoagulation clinic were asked to participate in the trial, providing that they had Internet access and could use the CoaguChek XS system. A total of 140 patients were included and randomized to (A) once weekly measurement and report online, (B) twice weekly measurement and report online, and (C) continued conventional treatment with INR measurement in the lab every 4 weeks and dose adjustment by letter.

RESULTS

Group A had 79.7% (95% CI 79.0-80.3) of time in therapeutic range (TTR), group B 80.2% (95% CI 79.4-80.9) of TTR, and group C 72.7% (95% CI 71.9-73.4) TTR. Groups A and B perform statistically significantly better than the conventional group C, with a difference of TTR of 7% points (p < 2.2 × 10(-16)), whereas no difference was seen between A and B.

CONCLUSION

Home measurement of INR and the reporting and dosing of results online once a week increase TTR from 72% to 79% as compared to conventional computer-assisted monitoring in an anticoagulation clinic.

摘要

背景与目的

我们开发了一个专家计算机系统,用于控制口服抗凝治疗,患者可通过自己的计算机使用该系统。为了研究在家中使用基于互联网的在线系统每周测量和调整国际标准化比值(INR)是否优于传统治疗,我们进行了一项随机对照试验。

患者与方法

我们要求所有在我们抗凝门诊的 669 名患者参与试验,条件是他们有互联网接入并能够使用 CoaguChek XS 系统。共有 140 名患者入组并随机分为(A)每周一次在线测量和报告,(B)每周两次在线测量和报告,以及(C)继续传统治疗,每 4 周在实验室测量 INR 并通过信函调整剂量。

结果

A 组的治疗时间百分比(TTR)为 79.7%(95%置信区间 79.0-80.3),B 组为 80.2%(95%置信区间 79.4-80.9),C 组为 72.7%(95%置信区间 71.9-73.4)。A 组和 B 组的 TTR 明显优于传统组 C 组,TTR 差异为 7%(p<2.2×10(-16)),而 A 组和 B 组之间无差异。

结论

与抗凝门诊中的传统计算机辅助监测相比,在家中测量 INR 并每周在线报告和调整剂量可将 TTR 从 72%提高到 79%。

相似文献

1
Home management of oral anticoagulation via telemedicine versus conventional hospital-based treatment.
Telemed J E Health. 2011 Apr;17(3):169-76. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0128. Epub 2011 Jan 23.
2
Outcomes of warfarin therapy managed by pharmacists via hospital anticoagulation clinic versus online anticoagulation clinic.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1072-1077. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0674-0. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
4
Regarding: "home management of oral anticoagulation via telemedicine versus conventional hospital-based treatment".
Telemed J E Health. 2012 May;18(4):314; author reply 315. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0175. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
5
Direct-to-patient expert system and home INR monitoring improves control of oral anticoagulation.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Aug;26(1):14-21. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0068-y. Epub 2007 Jul 8.
8
Randomized controlled trial of supervised patient self-testing of warfarin therapy using an internet-based expert system.
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;7(8):1284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03497.x. Epub 2009 May 30.
10
Home Management of Warfarin Treatment Through a Real-Time Supervised Telemedicine Solution: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Feb;25(2):109-115. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0260. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

引用本文的文献

2
Comparative effectiveness of warfarin management strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jul 2;74:102712. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102712. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Digital Transformation in Thoracic Surgery: a survey among the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Jul 3;39(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae119.
10
Educational and behavioural interventions for anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 5;4(4):CD008600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008600.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 10;361(24):2342-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906598.
2
Randomized controlled trial of supervised patient self-testing of warfarin therapy using an internet-based expert system.
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Aug;7(8):1284-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03497.x. Epub 2009 May 30.
5
Self-management program improves anticoagulation control and quality of life: a prospective randomized study.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Feb;35(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.020. Epub 2008 Nov 28.
6
The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Feb;32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01120.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
7
Quality of oral anticoagulant therapy in patients who perform self management: warfarin versus phenprocoumon.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009 Oct;28(3):276-81. doi: 10.1007/s11239-008-0274-2. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
8
Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Thromb Res. 2008;123(2):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.04.021. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
9
Burden of potentially avoidable anticoagulant-associated hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events in the elderly.
Chest. 2007 May;131(5):1508-15. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-2628. Epub 2007 Feb 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验