• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)分离性障碍结构化临床访谈:一种新诊断工具的初步报告

The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders: preliminary report on a new diagnostic instrument.

作者信息

Steinberg M, Rounsaville B, Cicchetti D V

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06508.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;147(1):76-82. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.1.76.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.147.1.76
PMID:2293792
Abstract

The authors describe the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D), which investigates five groups of dissociative symptoms (amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, identity confusion, and identity alteration) and systematically rates both the severity of individual symptoms and the evaluation of overall diagnosis of dissociative disorder. Preliminary findings from a study of 48 subjects with and without psychiatric diagnoses indicate good to excellent reliability and discriminant validity for the SCID-D as a diagnostic instrument for the five dissociative disorders and as a tool for the evaluation of dissociative symptoms encountered within nondissociative syndromes.

摘要

作者描述了用于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》(DSM-III-R)解离性障碍的结构化临床访谈(SCID-D),该访谈调查五组解离症状(失忆、人格解体、现实解体、身份混淆和身份改变),并系统地对个体症状的严重程度以及解离性障碍的总体诊断评估进行评分。一项针对48名有或无精神疾病诊断的受试者的研究初步结果表明,SCID-D作为五种解离性障碍的诊断工具以及评估非解离性综合征中遇到的解离症状的工具,具有良好到极佳的信度和区分效度。

相似文献

1
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders: preliminary report on a new diagnostic instrument.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)分离性障碍结构化临床访谈:一种新诊断工具的初步报告
Am J Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;147(1):76-82. doi: 10.1176/ajp.147.1.76.
2
Diagnosing dissociative disorders in The Netherlands: a pilot study with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders.荷兰分离性障碍的诊断:一项使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)分离性障碍结构化临床访谈》的试点研究
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Apr;148(4):458-62. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.4.458.
3
Multiple personality.多重人格。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):419-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.419.
4
Detection of dissociative disorders in psychiatric patients by a screening instrument and a structured diagnostic interview.使用筛查工具和结构化诊断访谈对精神科患者的分离性障碍进行检测。
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;148(8):1050-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.8.1050.
5
Disintegrated experience: the dissociative disorders revisited.解体体验:再探分离性障碍
J Abnorm Psychol. 1991 Aug;100(3):366-78. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.100.3.366.
6
[Study of dissociative disorders and depersonalization in a sample of young adult French population].[法国年轻成年人群样本中分离性障碍和人格解体的研究]
Encephale. 2001 Nov-Dec;27(6):559-69.
7
Using the SCID-D to assess dissociative identity disorder in adolescents: three case studies.使用分离性身份障碍诊断问卷(SCID-D)评估青少年分离性身份障碍:三个案例研究
Bull Menninger Clin. 1995 Spring;59(2):221-31.
8
Use of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders for systematic assessment of dissociative symptoms in posttraumatic stress disorder.使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》分离性障碍的结构化临床访谈对创伤后应激障碍中的分离症状进行系统评估。
Am J Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;150(7):1011-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.7.1011.
9
Dissociative disorders in DSM-5.《DSM-5 中的分离性障碍》
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Sep;28(9):824-52. doi: 10.1002/da.20874.
10
Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D): a preliminary study.DSM-IV 解离障碍定式临床访谈土耳其语版的信度和效度:一项初步研究。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2014;15(1):24-34. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2013.821434.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociation and its biological and clinical associations in functional neurological disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.分离及其在功能性神经障碍中的生物学和临床关联:系统评价与荟萃分析
BJPsych Open. 2022 Dec 1;9(1):e2. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.597.
2
Maladaptive Daydreaming, Dissociation, and the Dissociative Disorders.适应不良性白日梦、分离及分离性障碍
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2020 Oct 5;2(2):53-61. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20190050. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Psychological Mediators of the Association Between Childhood Emotional Abuse and Depression: A Systematic Review.
童年期情感虐待与抑郁症关联中的心理调节因素:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 4;11:559213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.559213. eCollection 2020.
4
Assessing Voice Hearing in Trauma Spectrum Disorders: A Comparison of Two Measures and a Review of the Literature.评估创伤谱系障碍中的幻听:两种测量方法的比较及文献综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 24;10:1011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01011. eCollection 2019.
5
Treatment compliance and effectiveness in complex PTSD patients with co-morbid personality disorder undergoing stabilizing cognitive behavioral group treatment: a preliminary study.共病人格障碍的复杂 PTSD 患者接受稳定认知行为团体治疗的治疗依从性和疗效:初步研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013 Nov 6;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.21171. eCollection 2013.
6
Increased anterior cingulate cortex and hippocampus activation in Complex PTSD during encoding of negative words.创伤后应激障碍患者在对负性词汇进行编码时,前扣带回皮质和海马体的激活增加。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):190-200. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr084. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
7
Cognitive processes in dissociation: comment on Giesbrecht et al. (2008).分离中的认知过程:评 Giesbrecht 等人(2008 年)。
Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;136(1):1-6; discussion 7-11. doi: 10.1037/a0018021.
8
Dissociative identity disorder and schizophrenia: differential diagnosis and theoretical issues.分离性身份障碍与精神分裂症:鉴别诊断及理论问题
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008 Jun;10(3):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s11920-008-0036-z.
9
Dissociation and symptom dimensions of obsessive-compulsive disorder. A replication study.强迫症的解离与症状维度:一项重复研究
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006 Apr;256(3):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s00406-005-0620-8. Epub 2005 Nov 4.