Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Vaccine. 2012 Oct 5;30(45):6347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.029. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
We conducted a systematic review of the published literature to examine the impact of new vaccine introduction on countries' immunization and broader health systems. Six publication databases were searched using 104 vaccine and health system-related search terms. The search yielded 15,795 unique articles dating from December 31, 1911 to September 29, 2010. Based on review of the title and abstract, 654 (4%) of these articles were found to be potentially relevant and were referred for full review. After full review, 130 articles were found to be relevant and included in the analysis. These articles represented vaccines introduced to protect against 10 different diseases (hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b disease, human papilloma virus infection, influenza, Japanese encephalitis, meningococcal meningitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae disease, rotavirus diarrhea and typhoid), in various formulations and combinations. Most reviewed articles (97 [75%]) reported experiences in high-income countries. New vaccine introduction was most efficient when the vaccine was introduced into an existing delivery platform and when introduced in combination with a vaccine already in the routine childhood immunization schedule (i.e., as a combination vaccine). New vaccine introduction did not impact coverage of vaccines already included in the routine childhood immunization schedule. The need for increased cold chain capacity was frequently reported. New vaccines facilitated the introduction and widespread use of auto-disable syringes into the immunization and the broader health systems. The importance of training and education for health care workers and social mobilization was frequently noted. There was evidence in high-income countries that new vaccine introduction was associated with reduced health-care costs. Future evaluations of new vaccine introductions should include the systematic and objective assessment of the impacts on a country's immunization system and broader health system, especially in lower-income countries.
我们对已发表的文献进行了系统回顾,以研究新疫苗的引入对国家免疫规划和更广泛的卫生系统的影响。我们使用 104 个与疫苗和卫生系统相关的检索词,对 6 个文献数据库进行了检索。该检索共获取了 1911 年 12 月 31 日至 2010 年 9 月 29 日期间的 15795 篇独特的文章。根据对标题和摘要的审查,其中有 654 篇(4%)文章可能与研究相关,并被进一步全文审查。经过全文审查,发现有 130 篇文章与研究相关并被纳入分析。这些文章涉及预防 10 种不同疾病(甲型肝炎、乙型肝炎、b 型流感嗜血杆菌病、人乳头瘤病毒感染、流感、日本脑炎、脑膜炎球菌性脑膜炎、肺炎链球菌病、轮状病毒腹泻和伤寒)的疫苗,疫苗有不同的剂型和组合。大部分回顾性文章(97 篇[75%])报道的是高收入国家的经验。当疫苗引入现有的接种平台并与常规儿童免疫接种计划中的疫苗(即联合疫苗)联合使用时,新疫苗的引入最为有效。新疫苗的引入不会影响已纳入常规儿童免疫接种计划的疫苗的覆盖率。经常有报道称需要增加冷链能力。新疫苗促进了自动毁伤注射器在免疫规划和更广泛的卫生系统中的引入和广泛使用。经常强调需要对卫生保健工作者进行培训和教育以及开展社会动员。在高收入国家有证据表明,新疫苗的引入与降低医疗保健费用有关。未来对新疫苗引入的评估应包括系统和客观地评估对国家免疫规划系统和更广泛卫生系统的影响,特别是在低收入国家。