Suppr超能文献

冷冻保存主动脉同种异体移植物的力学测试。与异种移植物和新鲜组织的比较。

Mechanical testing of cryopreserved aortic allografts. Comparison with xenografts and fresh tissue.

作者信息

Vesely I, Gonzalez-Lavin L, Graf D, Boughner D

机构信息

John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990 Jan;99(1):119-23.

PMID:2294344
Abstract

Reports indicate that cryopreserved aortic valve allografts have a better long-term survivability than other bioprostheses, such as the porcine xenograft. Unlike xenografts, allograft valves do not require treatment with glutaraldehyde and may therefore retain much of their original mechanical function. The effects of cryopreservation on the mechanical integrity of collagen fibers and mucopolysaccharides, however, are still largely unknown. We therefore compared the mechanical behavior of cryopreserved allograft leaflet material to that of fresh tissue and xenografts by measuring their bending stiffness (nine strips of tissue) and their uniaxial tensile stress/strain and stress/relaxation behavior (six strips of each tissue type). The bending tests showed no significant difference between the pliability of cryopreserved allografts and fresh pig aortic valve tissue, but the xenograft material was significantly stiffer than both (p less than 0.001). The mean circumferential tensile elastic moduli of the allografts, fresh tissue, and xenografts at a stress of 300 kPa were 9.1 +/- 5.4 MPa, 13.0 +/- 1.7 MPa, and 12.5 +/- 3.0 MPa, respectively, and were not significantly different from each other. We also found that the transition from a low to a high modulus on the stress/strain curves, a measure of extensibility, occurs at 23%, 22%, and 12% strain for the three materials. There was no significant difference between the allograft and the fresh tissues, but the xenograft material was less extensible than the other two (p less than 0.001). The xenograft tissue also had significantly lower rates of stress relaxation than the other two materials (p less than 0.005). Thus no detectable differences were found between the mechanical behavior of the cryopreserved allograft aortic leaflets and fresh tissue, whereas the xenograft material was less extensible and less capable of relaxing than both the allograft and fresh tissue. The ability of allografts valves to respond to tensile and flexural stresses in a manner similar to that of the natural aortic valve may therefore contribute to their good in vivo survivability.

摘要

报告表明,冷冻保存的同种异体主动脉瓣膜比其他生物假体,如猪异种移植物,具有更好的长期生存能力。与异种移植物不同,同种异体移植瓣膜不需要用戊二醛处理,因此可能保留其大部分原始机械功能。然而,冷冻保存对胶原纤维和粘多糖机械完整性的影响在很大程度上仍然未知。因此,我们通过测量冷冻保存的同种异体移植瓣叶材料、新鲜组织和异种移植物的弯曲刚度(九条组织条带)以及它们的单轴拉伸应力/应变和应力/松弛行为(每种组织类型六条组织条带),比较了它们的力学行为。弯曲试验表明,冷冻保存的同种异体移植物与新鲜猪主动脉瓣膜组织的柔韧性之间没有显著差异,但异种移植材料比两者都明显更硬(p小于0.001)。在300 kPa应力下,同种异体移植物、新鲜组织和异种移植物的平均周向拉伸弹性模量分别为9.1±5.4 MPa、13.0±1.7 MPa和12.5±3.0 MPa,彼此之间无显著差异。我们还发现,三种材料在应力/应变曲线上从低模量到高模量的转变(一种可扩展性的度量)分别发生在23%、22%和12%应变处。同种异体移植物和新鲜组织之间没有显著差异,但异种移植材料的可扩展性低于其他两种材料(p小于0.001)。异种移植组织的应力松弛率也显著低于其他两种材料(p小于0.005)。因此,在冷冻保存的同种异体主动脉瓣叶的力学行为与新鲜组织之间未发现可检测到的差异,而异种移植材料的可扩展性和松弛能力均低于同种异体移植物和新鲜组织。同种异体移植瓣膜以类似于天然主动脉瓣膜的方式对拉伸和弯曲应力作出反应的能力,可能有助于其在体内的良好生存能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验