• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你最近为我做了什么?黑暗三元组特质阴影下的友谊选择。

What have you done for me lately? Friendship-selection in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits.

作者信息

Jonason Peter K, Schmitt David P

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Bankstown, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Evol Psychol. 2012 Jul 13;10(3):400-21. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000303.

DOI:10.1177/147470491201000303
PMID:22947669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10480828/
Abstract

The current studies examined how the Dark Triad personality traits (i.e., Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy) facilitate the strategic structuring of an individual's social environment in terms of same- and opposite-sex friends. In one study using normative questions (N = 267) and another using a budget-allocation task (N = 114), we found that the Dark Triad traits were associated with choosing friends for strategic purposes and to create a volatile environment. Narcissistic individuals reported relatively more reasons to form friendships, such as shared interests, makes me feel good, and intelligence. Women high in narcissism chose same-sex friends who were attractive and women high on Machiavellianism chose same-sex friends who have social status. Men high on psychopathy devalued traits associated with good social relationships in favor of friends who could facilitate their mating efforts and to offset risks incurred in their life history strategy. Results are discussed using the selection-manipulation-evocation framework for explaining how personality traits interact with social environments and integrated with findings from evolutionary biology.

摘要

当前的研究考察了黑暗三性格特质(即马基雅维利主义、自恋和精神病态)如何在同性和异性朋友方面促进个体社会环境的战略构建。在一项使用规范性问题的研究(N = 267)和另一项使用预算分配任务的研究(N = 114)中,我们发现黑暗三性格特质与出于战略目的选择朋友以及营造一个多变的环境有关。自恋的个体报告了相对更多建立友谊的理由,比如共同兴趣、让我感觉良好以及聪明才智。自恋程度高的女性选择有吸引力的同性朋友,而马基雅维利主义程度高的女性选择有社会地位的同性朋友。精神病态程度高的男性贬低与良好社会关系相关的特质,而青睐那些能促进其交配努力并抵消其生命史策略中所产生风险的朋友。我们使用选择 - 操纵 - 唤起框架来讨论这些结果,以解释人格特质如何与社会环境相互作用,并与进化生物学的研究结果相结合。

相似文献

1
What have you done for me lately? Friendship-selection in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits.你最近为我做了什么?黑暗三元组特质阴影下的友谊选择。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Jul 13;10(3):400-21. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000303.
2
Standing out and not fitting in: The Dark Triad traits and social values.特立独行且不合群:黑暗人格特质与社会价值观。
J Soc Psychol. 2020;160(2):164-169. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1623162. Epub 2019 May 25.
3
Narcissists of a Feather Flock Together: Narcissism and the Similarity of Friends.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Mar;42(3):366-84. doi: 10.1177/0146167216629114.
4
The Exploitive Mating Strategy of the Dark Triad Traits: Tests of Rape-Enabling Attitudes.黑暗三性格特质的剥削性交配策略:对促成强奸态度的测试。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Apr;46(3):697-706. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0937-1. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
5
Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: comparing Factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder.寻找易患的黑暗人格三联征:比较第二因子型精神病态、易患型自恋和边缘型人格障碍。
J Pers. 2010 Oct;78(5):1529-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
6
As cold as a fish? Relationships between the Dark Triad personality traits and affective experience during the day: A day reconstruction study.像鱼一样冷漠?黑暗人格特质与白天情感体验的关系:一项日间重构研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 25;15(2):e0229625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229625. eCollection 2020.
7
How happiness expectations relate to the Dark Triad traits.幸福感期望与黑暗三特质的关系。
J Soc Psychol. 2019;159(4):371-382. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2018.1529652. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries.49个国家中黑暗三性格特征的国家层面相关因素。
J Pers. 2020 Dec;88(6):1252-1267. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12569. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Dark Triad Traits and Mate Retention Behaviors in Romantic Couples: The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.浪漫情侣中的黑暗三性格特质与配偶保留行为:行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型
Evol Psychol. 2019 Oct-Dec;17(4):1474704919887703. doi: 10.1177/1474704919887703.
10
Leaving without a word: Ghosting and the Dark Triad traits.一言不发地离开:鬼遁现象与黑暗人格特质。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Oct;220:103425. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103425. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
I tweet, therefore I am: a systematic review on social media use and disorders of the social brain.我发推文,故我在:关于社交媒体使用与社会脑功能障碍的系统综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06528-6.
2
The Associations of Peer-Rated Popularity and Likeability With Dark Triad Personality Traits in Adolescent Groups.青少年群体中同伴评价的受欢迎程度和亲和力与黑暗三性格特质的关联。
Eur J Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;20(3):165-177. doi: 10.5964/ejop.11667. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Effective altruism and the dark side of entrepreneurship.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymmetries in the Friendship Preferences and Social Styles of Men and Women.男性和女性在友谊偏好与社交风格上的差异
Hum Nat. 2007 Jun;18(2):143-61. doi: 10.1007/s12110-007-9003-3.
2
Friends with benefits: the evolved psychology of same- and opposite-sex friendship.有利益关系的朋友:同性和异性友谊的进化心理学
Evol Psychol. 2011 Dec 8;9(4):543-63. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900407.
3
The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad.肮脏的十二人:黑暗三巨头的简明衡量标准。
有效利他主义与创业的阴暗面。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 16;14:1247331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1247331. eCollection 2023.
4
Cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediate the relationships between Dark Triad traits and negative emotional states experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.认知情绪调节策略介导了黑暗三性格特质与新冠疫情期间所经历的负面情绪状态之间的关系。
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Oct;181:111018. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111018. Epub 2021 May 26.
5
Narcissistic traits and compassion: Embracing oneself while devoiding others.自恋特质与同情心:接纳自我却排斥他人。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:914270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914270. eCollection 2022.
6
Examining the Relationship between Death Anxiety and Well-Being of Frontline Medical Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic.探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间一线医护人员死亡焦虑与幸福感之间的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;19(20):13430. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013430.
7
The Dark Triad Traits and the Prediction of Eudaimonic Wellbeing.黑暗三性格特质与幸福安康的预测
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 5;12:693778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693778. eCollection 2021.
8
Effects of Self-Concept on Narcissism: Mediational Role of Perceived Parenting.自我概念对自恋的影响:感知到的养育方式的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:674679. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674679. eCollection 2021.
9
Employee narcissism and promotability prospects.员工的自恋程度与晋升前景。
J Pers. 2021 Aug;89(4):847-862. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12619. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
10
The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit.自恋的“为什么”和“如何”:自恋状态追求的过程模型。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):150-172. doi: 10.1177/1745691619873350. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32. doi: 10.1037/a0019265.
4
Cooperative breeding in South American hunter-gatherers.南美洲狩猎采集者中的合作繁殖行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 7;276(1674):3863-70. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1061. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
5
Cooperative courtship: helping friends raise and raze relationship barriers.合作求爱:帮助朋友建立并消除关系障碍。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Oct;35(10):1285-300. doi: 10.1177/0146167209335640. Epub 2009 May 19.
6
Males' greater tolerance of same-sex peers.
Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02269.x. Epub 2009 Jan 2.
7
Narcissism and social networking Web sites.自恋与社交网站
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Oct;34(10):1303-14. doi: 10.1177/0146167208320061. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
8
On being eager and uninhibited: narcissism and approach-avoidance motivation.论热情奔放:自恋与趋近-回避动机
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):1004-17. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316688. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
9
The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries.空间能力性别差异的狩猎采集者理论:来自40个国家的数据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Apr;36(2):261-8. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9168-6.
10
Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.短期伴侣偏好中的性别异同:是什么、是否存在以及为何如此。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468.