Cross Catharine P
Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Evol Psychol. 2010 Dec 23;8(4):779-92. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800418.
Sex differences in same-sex direct aggression and sociosexuality are among the most robust in the literature. The present article evaluated the hypothesis that both can be explained by a sex difference in the willingness to take impulsive risks. Self-report data were gathered from 3,775 respondents (1,514 female) on same-sex aggression, sociosexuality, and risky impulsivity. Risky impulsivity was higher for men than for women (d = .34) and path analysis showed it to be a common cause of same-sex aggression and sociosexuality for both sexes. However, it did not completely mediate the sex differences in same-sex aggression and sociosexuality. The results suggest that same-sex aggression and sociosexual behavior share a common psychological mechanism, but that fully explaining sex differences in aggression requires a more sensitive assay of impulsive risk and a consideration of dyadic processes.
同性间直接攻击行为和社会性取向中的性别差异是该领域文献中最为显著的差异之一。本文评估了一种假设,即这两种差异都可以通过冲动冒险意愿的性别差异来解释。我们收集了3775名受访者(1514名女性)关于同性攻击行为、社会性取向和冒险冲动性的自我报告数据。男性的冒险冲动性高于女性(d = 0.34),路径分析表明冒险冲动性是两性同性攻击行为和社会性取向的共同原因。然而,它并没有完全介导同性攻击行为和社会性取向中的性别差异。研究结果表明,同性攻击行为和社会性取向行为具有共同的心理机制,但要全面解释攻击行为中的性别差异,需要对冲动风险进行更敏感的分析,并考虑二元过程。