Bourrat Pierrick, Baumard Nicolas, McKay Ryan
School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiry, University of Sydney, Australia.
Evol Psychol. 2011 May 5;9(2):193-9. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900206.
Humans pay close attention to the reputational consequences of their actions. Recent experiments indicate that even very subtle cues that one is being observed can affect cooperative behaviors. Expressing our opinions about the morality of certain acts is a key means of advertising our cooperative dispositions. Here, we investigated how subtle cues of being watched would affect moral judgments. We predicted that participants exposed to such cues would affirm their endorsement of prevailing moral norms by expressing greater disapproval of moral transgressions. Participants read brief accounts of two moral violations and rated the moral acceptability of each violation. Violations were more strongly condemned in a condition where participants were exposed to surveillance cues (an image of eyes interposed between the description of the violation and the associated rating scale) than in a control condition (in which the interposed image was of flowers). We discuss the role that public declarations play in the interpersonal evaluation of cooperative dispositions.
人类非常关注自身行为的声誉后果。最近的实验表明,即使是表明自己正在被观察的非常细微的线索,也会影响合作行为。表达我们对某些行为道德性的看法,是宣传我们合作倾向的关键手段。在此,我们研究了被注视的细微线索如何影响道德判断。我们预测,接触到此类线索的参与者会通过对道德违规行为表达更强烈的不满,来肯定他们对现行道德规范的认同。参与者阅读了两起道德违规行为的简短描述,并对每起违规行为的道德可接受性进行评分。与对照条件(其中插入的图像是花朵)相比,在参与者接触到监视线索(在违规行为描述和相关评分量表之间插入眼睛的图像)的条件下,违规行为受到了更强烈的谴责。我们讨论了公开声明在合作倾向的人际评价中所起的作用。