在一个桦木流行地区,榛子和苹果的过敏反应与轻度反应:不同的致敏特征?

Anaphylactic versus mild reactions to hazelnut and apple in a birch-endemic area: different sensitization profiles?

机构信息

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160(1):56-62. doi: 10.1159/000339244. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hazelnut and apple are common causes of food allergy in Europe. In northern Europe, symptoms are usually mild and associated with cross-reactivity to the birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1. In the Mediterranean area, symptoms are more frequently severe and associated with sensitization to lipid transfer protein (LTP). This study compared patients with anaphylactic versus mild reactions to hazelnut and apple in The Netherlands, a birch-endemic area, with respect to sensitization to Bet v 1-homologues (i.e. PR10-proteins) and LTP.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients fulfilling the criteria for anaphylaxis and 21 with only mild symptoms (oral allergy) to hazelnut and/or apple were recruited. Specific immunoglobulin E to birch pollen, apple, hazelnut and PR10-proteins (rBet v 1, rPru p 1, rMal d 1 and rCor a 1) and recombinant LTP (rPru p 3 and rCor a 8) was measured by ImmunoCAP.

RESULTS

Both mild and anaphylactic apple-allergic patients were sensitized to PR10-proteins, whereas only 1/7 of the mild and none of the anaphylactic apple-allergic patients was sensitized to LTP. In contrast, anaphylactic hazelnut-allergic patients displayed no such clear sensitization pattern: some were sensitized to both PR10-proteins and hazelnut LTP (1/9), and others to only LTP (2/9) or to only PR10-proteins (4/9) or to neither PR10-proteins nor LTP (2/9).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in a birch-endemic area, the sensitization profile to PR10-proteins and LTP in anaphylactic patients may differ between different plant foods. In this patient group, anaphylaxis to hazelnut can be LTP-associated, whereas anaphylaxis to apple is not.

摘要

背景

榛子和苹果是欧洲常见的食物过敏原。在北欧,症状通常较轻,与桦树花粉过敏原 Bet v 1 交叉反应有关。在地中海地区,症状更常严重,并与对脂质转移蛋白 (LTP) 的致敏有关。本研究比较了在桦树流行地区荷兰,榛子和/或苹果过敏的过敏性与轻度反应患者,在对 Bet v 1 同源物(即 PR10 蛋白)和 LTP 的致敏方面。

方法

招募了 21 名符合过敏反应标准的患者和 21 名仅对榛子和/或苹果有轻度症状(口腔过敏)的患者。通过 ImmunoCAP 测量桦树花粉、苹果、榛子和 PR10 蛋白(rBet v 1、rPru p 1、rMal d 1 和 rCor a 1)和重组 LTP(rPru p 3 和 rCor a 8)的特异性免疫球蛋白 E。

结果

轻度和过敏性苹果过敏患者均对 PR10 蛋白致敏,而轻度过敏患者中只有 1/7,而过敏性苹果过敏患者中无一例对 LTP 致敏。相比之下,过敏性榛子过敏患者没有明显的致敏模式:有些患者对 PR10 蛋白和榛子 LTP 都致敏(1/9),有些患者仅对 LTP 致敏(2/9),有些患者仅对 PR10 蛋白致敏(4/9),有些患者对 PR10 蛋白和 LTP 都不致敏(2/9)。

结论

本研究表明,在桦树流行地区,过敏患者对 PR10 蛋白和 LTP 的致敏谱在不同植物性食物之间可能不同。在该患者组中,榛子过敏可能与 LTP 相关,而苹果过敏则不然。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索