Internal Medicine, Allergology & Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nutrients. 2021 Apr 18;13(4):1355. doi: 10.3390/nu13041355.
Approximately 70% of birch pollen allergic patients in Europe experience hypersensitivity reactions to Immunoglobulin E (IgE) cross-reactive food sources. This so-called pollen-food syndrome (PFS) is defined by allergic symptoms elicited promptly by the ingestion of fruits, nuts, or vegetables in these patients. So far, in the literature, less attention has been given to Bet v 1 cross-reactive symptoms caused by pear (). In the Netherlands, pears are widely consumed. The primary objective of this study was to measure the type and severity of allergic symptoms during pear challenges in birch pollen allergic patients, with a positive history of pear allergy, using two different pear varieties. Fifteen patients were included, skin prick test (SPT), prick-to-prick test (PTP), specific Immunoglobulin E (sIgE), and single-blind oral challenges were performed with two pear () varieties: the 'Cepuna' (brand name Migo) and the 'Conference' pears. All patients were sensitized to one or both pear varieties. A total of 12 out of 15 participants developed symptoms during the 'Cepuna' food challenge and 14/15 reacted during the 'Conference' challenge. Challenges with the 'Cepuna' pears resulted in less objective symptoms ( = 2) in comparison with challenges with 'Conference' pears ( = 7). Although we did not find significance between both varieties in our study, we found a high likelihood of fewer and less severe symptoms during the 'Cepuna' challenges. Consequently selected pear sensitized patients can try to consume small doses of the 'Cepuna' pear outside the birch pollen season.
约 70%的欧洲桦树花粉过敏患者对免疫球蛋白 E (IgE) 交叉反应的食物来源产生超敏反应。这种所谓的花粉-食物综合征 (PFS) 定义为这些患者摄入水果、坚果或蔬菜后迅速引发过敏症状。到目前为止,文献中对梨引起的 Bet v 1 交叉反应症状关注较少。在荷兰,梨被广泛食用。本研究的主要目的是测量有梨过敏史的桦树花粉过敏患者在梨挑战期间的过敏症状的类型和严重程度,使用两种不同的梨品种。共纳入 15 名患者,进行皮肤点刺试验 (SPT)、点刺试验 (PTP)、特异性免疫球蛋白 E (sIgE) 和两种梨 () 品种的单盲口服挑战:“Cepuna”(商品名 Migo)和“Conference”梨。所有患者均对一种或两种梨品种过敏。共有 15 名参与者中的 12 名在“Cepuna”食物挑战中出现症状,14/15 名在“Conference”挑战中出现反应。与“Conference”梨相比,“Cepuna”梨的挑战导致的客观症状较少(=2)。尽管我们在研究中没有发现两种品种之间的差异,但我们发现“Cepuna”挑战期间症状的可能性更小、更轻微。因此,选择的梨致敏患者可以尝试在桦树花粉季节之外少量食用“Cepuna”梨。