Max Planck Research Group 'Modelling the Evolution of Ageing', Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Gerontology. 2012;58(6):481-9. doi: 10.1159/000341861. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
Organisms of different species age differently. Current theory explains why life should get worse, i.e. why patterns of increasing risk of death should evolve. However, for some species the risk of death remains constant or even falls with advancing age. Evolutionary theory to explain the observed diversity of shapes of ageing is lacking. Theoretical models can provide insights into this diversity. Comparing assumptions of models that find increasing mortality patterns with models that find a variety of patterns, including constant and falling mortality over age, I identify conditions that licence constant or negative shapes of ageing. The results suggest that patterns of improvement and maintenance over age emerge when models potentially allow organisms to (1) escape the 'damage ratchet', (2) achieve maintenance and repair in parallel, (3) face increasing future reproductive potential and (4) incorporate flexible trade-offs. With these insights, theoretical models contribute to hypotheses about which species may follow life history strategies of negligible or negative ageing.
不同物种的生物体衰老的速度不同。现有理论解释了为什么生命状况会恶化,即为什么死亡风险增加的模式应该进化。然而,对于某些物种来说,死亡的风险保持不变,甚至随着年龄的增长而下降。缺乏解释观察到的衰老模式多样性的进化理论。理论模型可以提供对这种多样性的深入了解。通过比较发现死亡率增加模式的模型和发现包括随年龄增长死亡率不变或下降的各种模式的模型的假设,我确定了允许生物体保持或出现负老化形状的条件。结果表明,当模型允许生物体(1)逃脱“损伤棘轮”,(2)同时实现维护和修复,(3)面临不断增加的未来生殖潜力,以及(4)纳入灵活的权衡取舍时,生物体在年龄增长的过程中会出现改善和维持的模式。有了这些认识,理论模型有助于提出关于哪些物种可能遵循衰老程度可忽略或负的生命史策略的假说。