• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类会这样,蜜蜂会这样,人类也会这样:理论模型对理解生命之树上衰老的形态的贡献。

Birds do it, bees do it, we do it: contributions of theoretical modelling to understanding the shape of ageing across the tree of life.

机构信息

Max Planck Research Group 'Modelling the Evolution of Ageing', Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

Gerontology. 2012;58(6):481-9. doi: 10.1159/000341861. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1159/000341861
PMID:22948534
Abstract

Organisms of different species age differently. Current theory explains why life should get worse, i.e. why patterns of increasing risk of death should evolve. However, for some species the risk of death remains constant or even falls with advancing age. Evolutionary theory to explain the observed diversity of shapes of ageing is lacking. Theoretical models can provide insights into this diversity. Comparing assumptions of models that find increasing mortality patterns with models that find a variety of patterns, including constant and falling mortality over age, I identify conditions that licence constant or negative shapes of ageing. The results suggest that patterns of improvement and maintenance over age emerge when models potentially allow organisms to (1) escape the 'damage ratchet', (2) achieve maintenance and repair in parallel, (3) face increasing future reproductive potential and (4) incorporate flexible trade-offs. With these insights, theoretical models contribute to hypotheses about which species may follow life history strategies of negligible or negative ageing.

摘要

不同物种的生物体衰老的速度不同。现有理论解释了为什么生命状况会恶化,即为什么死亡风险增加的模式应该进化。然而,对于某些物种来说,死亡的风险保持不变,甚至随着年龄的增长而下降。缺乏解释观察到的衰老模式多样性的进化理论。理论模型可以提供对这种多样性的深入了解。通过比较发现死亡率增加模式的模型和发现包括随年龄增长死亡率不变或下降的各种模式的模型的假设,我确定了允许生物体保持或出现负老化形状的条件。结果表明,当模型允许生物体(1)逃脱“损伤棘轮”,(2)同时实现维护和修复,(3)面临不断增加的未来生殖潜力,以及(4)纳入灵活的权衡取舍时,生物体在年龄增长的过程中会出现改善和维持的模式。有了这些认识,理论模型有助于提出关于哪些物种可能遵循衰老程度可忽略或负的生命史策略的假说。

相似文献

1
Birds do it, bees do it, we do it: contributions of theoretical modelling to understanding the shape of ageing across the tree of life.鸟类会这样,蜜蜂会这样,人类也会这样:理论模型对理解生命之树上衰老的形态的贡献。
Gerontology. 2012;58(6):481-9. doi: 10.1159/000341861. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
Evolution of aging: individual life history trade-offs and population heterogeneity account for mortality patterns across species.衰老的演化:个体生命史权衡与种群异质性解释了物种间的死亡模式。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Aug;27(8):1706-20. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12423. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
3
Longevity and ageing: appraising the evolutionary consequences of growing old.长寿与衰老:评估变老的进化后果。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 29;361(1465):119-35. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1738.
4
Ageing and the extinction of large animals.大型动物的衰老与灭绝
Biogerontology. 2005;6(2):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s10522-005-3458-6.
5
The reliability-engineering approach to the problem of biological aging.解决生物衰老问题的可靠性工程方法。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1019:509-12. doi: 10.1196/annals.1297.094.
6
Early-late life trade-offs and the evolution of ageing in the wild.生命早期与晚期的权衡及野生动物衰老的进化
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 7;282(1806):20150209. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0209.
7
Why do we age?我们为什么会衰老?
Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):233-8. doi: 10.1038/35041682.
8
The reliability theory of aging and longevity.衰老与长寿的可靠性理论。
J Theor Biol. 2001 Dec 21;213(4):527-45. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430.
9
The consequences of direct versus indirect species interactions to selection on traits: pollination and nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata.直接与间接物种相互作用对性状选择的影响:聚合花烟草中的传粉与花蜜盗食
Am Nat. 2006 Mar;167(3):315-28. doi: 10.1086/499377. Epub 2005 Jan 30.
10
The regulatory anatomy of honeybee lifespan.蜜蜂寿命的调控解剖学。
J Theor Biol. 2002 May 21;216(2):209-28. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.2545.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolutionary Approaches in Aging Research.衰老研究中的进化方法。
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2022 Nov 1;12(11):a041195. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a041195.
2
A Tissue Engineered Model of Aging: Interdependence and Cooperative Effects in Failing Tissues.一种组织工程化的衰老模型:衰竭组织中的相互依存和协同效应。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 11;7(1):5051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05098-2.
3
Interaction mortality: senescence may have evolved because it increases lifespan.相互作用死亡率:衰老可能已经进化,因为它会延长寿命。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 9;9(10):e109638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109638. eCollection 2014.
4
Testing evolutionary models of senescence: traditional approaches and future directions.衰老进化模型的检验:传统方法与未来方向
Hum Genet. 2014 Dec;133(12):1451-65. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1492-7. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
5
How evolving heterogeneity distributions of resource allocation strategies shape mortality patterns.资源分配策略的进化异质性分布如何塑造死亡率模式。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(1):e1002825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002825. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
6
Evolution. Getting to the root of aging.进化。探寻衰老的根源。
Science. 2012 Nov 2;338(6107):618-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1226467.