Watkins C Edward
Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-5017, USA.
Am J Psychoanal. 2012 Sep;72(3):251-68. doi: 10.1057/ajp.2012.14.
What role does the real relationship play in psychoanalytic supervision? While the real relationship's role has long been and continues to be considered with regard to psychoanalysis, it has received virtually no attention in the supervision literature. In this paper, using Horney's construct of the real self as conceptual anchor, I attempt to: (1) situate the real relationship squarely within the borders of the psychoanalytic supervision relationship; (2) examine the relevance of real relationship phenomena for the supervision experience; (3) provide some simple, ordinary yet meaningful examples of case dialogue that illustrate moments of real relationship in supervision; and (4) introduce the concept of real relationship rupture and consider its potential ramifications for and impact upon the supervisor-supervisee relationship. Just as ruptures can occur in the supervisory alliance, I propose that ruptures can also transpire in the supervisory real relationship, have the potential to reverberate throughout the entirety of the supervision experience, and depending upon how they are handled, can prove either constructive and relationally energizing and enlivening or enervating and eviscerating to supervision process and outcome.
真实关系在精神分析督导中扮演着怎样的角色?尽管真实关系在精神分析领域的角色长期以来一直受到关注且仍在被探讨,但在督导文献中却几乎未得到关注。在本文中,我以霍妮的真实自我结构作为概念锚点,试图:(1)将真实关系明确置于精神分析督导关系的范畴内;(2)审视真实关系现象与督导体验的相关性;(3)提供一些简单、平常却有意义的案例对话示例,以说明督导中真实关系的时刻;(4)引入真实关系破裂的概念,并思考其对督导者 - 被督导者关系的潜在影响及作用。正如督导联盟中会出现破裂一样,我认为督导中的真实关系也可能发生破裂,这种破裂有可能在整个督导体验中产生回响,并且根据处理方式的不同,可能对督导过程和结果起到建设性的、促进关系活力的作用,也可能起到削弱和破坏的作用。