• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注视点处过滤性中央凹阅读:阅读时注视点处视觉质量的影响。

Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1078-84. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0307-x.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-012-0307-x
PMID:22949037
Abstract

Reading relies critically on processing text in foveal vision during brief fixational pauses, and high-quality visual input from foveal text is fundamental to theories of reading. However, the quality of visual input from foveal text that is actually functional for reading and the effects of this input on reading performance are unclear. To investigate these issues, a moving, gaze-contingent foveal filtering technique was developed to display areas of text within foveal vision that provided only coarse, medium, or fine scale visual input during each fixational pause during reading. Normal reading times were unaffected when foveal text up to three characters wide at the point of fixation provided any one visual input (coarse, medium, or fine). Wider areas of coarse visual input lengthened reading times, but reading still occurred, and normal reading times were completely unaffected when only medium or fine visual input extended across the entire fovea. Further analyses revealed that each visual input had no effect on the number of fixations made when normal text was read, that adjusting fixation durations helped preserve reading efficiency for different visual inputs, and that each visual input had virtually no effect on normal saccades. These findings indicate that, despite the resolving power of foveal vision and the emphasis placed on high-quality foveal visual input by theories of reading, normal reading functions with similar success using a range of restricted visual inputs from foveal text, even at the point of fixation. Some implications of these findings for theories of reading are discussed.

摘要

阅读在很大程度上依赖于在短暂注视停顿期间对中央凹视觉中的文本进行处理,而来自中央凹文本的高质量视觉输入是阅读理论的基础。然而,对于实际用于阅读的中央凹文本的视觉输入质量以及该输入对阅读表现的影响尚不清楚。为了研究这些问题,开发了一种移动的、与注视相关的中央凹滤波技术,以在阅读过程中的每次注视停顿期间显示中央凹视觉内的文本区域,这些区域仅提供粗糙、中等或精细的视觉输入。当注视点处的中央凹文本宽度不超过三个字符时,提供任何一种视觉输入(粗糙、中等或精细)都不会影响正常的阅读时间。更宽的粗糙视觉输入区域会延长阅读时间,但当整个中央凹区域仅延伸中等或精细视觉输入时,阅读仍会发生,且正常阅读时间完全不受影响。进一步的分析表明,当阅读正常文本时,每种视觉输入都不会影响注视次数,调整注视持续时间有助于保持不同视觉输入的阅读效率,并且每种视觉输入对正常扫视几乎没有影响。这些发现表明,尽管中央凹视觉的分辨率很高,并且阅读理论强调高质量的中央凹视觉输入,但正常阅读在使用中央凹文本的一系列受限视觉输入时仍然能够以相似的成功率进行,甚至在注视点处也是如此。这些发现对阅读理论有一些启示。

相似文献

1
Reading with a filtered fovea: the influence of visual quality at the point of fixation during reading.注视点处过滤性中央凹阅读:阅读时注视点处视觉质量的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1078-84. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0307-x.
2
Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: does an extra space make a difference?文本阅读中副中央凹对中央凹的眼动影响:一个额外的空格会有影响吗?
Vision Res. 2005 Jun;45(13):1693-706. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.010.
3
Different temporal dynamics of foveal and peripheral visual processing during fixation.注视时中央和周边视觉处理的不同时间动态。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 10;121(37):e2408067121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2408067121. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.阅读过程中眼注视时中央凹和中央凹旁视觉的掩盖。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Feb;7(1):167-79. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.7.1.167.
5
Reading without a fovea.无中央凹阅读。
Science. 1979 Oct 26;206(4417):468-9. doi: 10.1126/science.504987.
6
Task-driven visual exploration at the foveal scale.基于任务的注视点尺度视觉探索
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5811-5818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812222116. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
Binocular advantages for parafoveal processing in reading.阅读中中央凹旁视觉处理的双眼优势。
Vision Res. 2018 Apr;145:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
8
Parafoveal magnification: visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading.周边视野放大:阅读时,视力并不调节知觉广度。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Jun;20(6):721-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02364.x. Epub 2009 May 15.
9
Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.旁中央凹加工中的右视野优势:来自眼动注视相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2009 Nov;111(2):101-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.004. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
10
Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.阅读时眼跳过程中老年人和年轻人的预视收益。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Sep;25(3):714-8. doi: 10.1037/a0019199.

引用本文的文献

1
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.眼动追踪基础 第4部分:进行眼动追踪研究的工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jan 6;57(1):46. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.
2
Investigating the Effectiveness of Spatial Frequencies to the Left and Right of Central Vision during Reading: Evidence from Reading Times and Eye Movements.探究阅读过程中中央视觉左右两侧空间频率的有效性:来自阅读时间和眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 18;8:807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00807. eCollection 2017.
3
Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.

本文引用的文献

1
Out of sight, out of mind: the rarity of assessing and reporting participants' visual abilities when studying perception of linguistic stimuli.眼不见,心不烦:研究语言刺激感知时评估和报告参与者视觉能力的罕见性。
Perception. 2011;40(7):873-6. doi: 10.1068/p6940.
2
Not all aberrations are equal: reading impairment depends on aberration type and magnitude.并非所有像差都是相同的:阅读障碍取决于像差的类型和程度。
J Vis. 2011 Nov 22;11(13):20. doi: 10.1167/11.13.20.
3
Aging and vision.衰老与视力。
空间频率对快速和慢速阅读者单词识别的影响:来自眼动的证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 28;7:1433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01433. eCollection 2016.
4
Seeing Inscriptions on the Shroud of Turin: The Role of Psychological Influences in the Perception of Writing.看到都灵裹尸布上的铭文:心理影响在文字感知中的作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 28;10(10):e0136860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136860. eCollection 2015.
5
Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference.观看位置对标准Stroop干扰与语义Stroop干扰的不同影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):425-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0507-z.
6
Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text: evidence from eye movements.成人衰老对过滤文本阅读的影响:来自眼动的证据。
PeerJ. 2013 Apr 9;1:e63. doi: 10.7717/peerj.63. Print 2013.
Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1610-22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.10.020. Epub 2010 Oct 23.
4
Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search.阅读、场景感知和视觉搜索中的眼动与注意力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Aug;62(8):1457-506. doi: 10.1080/17470210902816461. Epub 2009 May 14.
5
A multistream model of visual word recognition.视觉单词识别的多流模型。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):281-96. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.281.
6
Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible.在阅读过程中同时对多个单词进行编码是不太可能的。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
7
The role of low-spatial frequencies in lexical decision and masked priming.低空间频率在词汇判断和掩蔽启动中的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2009 Apr;69(3):580-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Jan 24.
8
Foveal processing and word skipping during reading.阅读过程中的中央凹处理与跳读
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Aug;15(4):856-60. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.4.856.
9
Role of the tear film in the optical quality of the human eye.泪膜在人眼光学质量中的作用。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Sep;33(9):1631-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.019.
10
Examining the word identification stages hypothesized by the E-Z Reader model.检验由E-Z阅读器模型假设的单词识别阶段。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):742-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01775.x.