Department of Neurology, National Taiwan UniversityHospital, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012 Dec;9(10):1142-8. doi: 10.2174/156720512804142967.
Although there is a consensus on the reduced levels of Aβ1-42 in the CSF of patients with AD, studies of plasma Aβ levels were inconsistent and have limited clinical value. We developed an immunomagnetic reduction assay (IMR) to determine the plasma levels of Aβ. We surveyed patients with varying AD severity (CDR = 0.5, n=16; CDR ≥ 1, n=18) and controls (n=26). Significant group differences were apparent in the levels of Aβ1-42 (F = 5.54, p = 0.002) and the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio (F = 24.198, p < 0.001). Post-hoc analyses showed significant differences in the Aβ1-42 levels of controls and AD patients (p = 0.001) and in the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio of control, MCI and AD subjects (all p ≤ 0.001). Regression analysis of Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios on dementia severity showed an adjusted R2 of 0.553 (p = 0.001). We identified a cut-off of 16.1 pg/ml for Aβ1-42 to differentiate control subjects from patients (both AD and MCI) with 85.3% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity. We also obtained a cut-off value of 0.303 for Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios with 85.3% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity. APOE 4 carriers had significantly higher Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratios than the non-carriers (F = 4.839, p = 0.015). An independent group of case-control subjects validated both cut-off values for Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 (100% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity) and for Aβ1-42 (100% sensitivity and 75.3% specificity). In a subgroup of longitudinal follow- up study, we found that the plasma Aβ was relatively stable with an interval of approximately 3 months. In conclusion, we found that the plasma Aβ1-42 is a useful biomarker for AD. The Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio improves the diagnostic power of the plasma Aβ biomarkers. The iron nanoparticles and IMR provides a novel method to measure plasma Aβ and could serve as an important clinical tool for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases.
尽管人们对 AD 患者脑脊液中 Aβ1-42 水平降低达成共识,但血浆 Aβ 水平的研究结果并不一致,且临床价值有限。我们开发了一种免疫磁还原测定法(IMR)来确定血浆 Aβ 水平。我们调查了不同 AD 严重程度的患者(CDR = 0.5,n=16;CDR≥1,n=18)和对照组(n=26)。Aβ1-42 水平的组间差异具有统计学意义(F = 5.54,p = 0.002),Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值的组间差异也具有统计学意义(F = 24.198,p < 0.001)。事后分析显示,对照组和 AD 患者的 Aβ1-42 水平(p = 0.001)以及对照组、MCI 和 AD 受试者的 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值(均 p ≤ 0.001)存在显著差异。对痴呆严重程度与 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值的回归分析显示,调整后的 R2 为 0.553(p = 0.001)。我们确定了一个区分对照组与 AD 和 MCI 患者的 Aβ1-42 截断值为 16.1 pg/ml,其具有 85.3%的敏感性和 88.5%的特异性。我们还获得了 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值的截断值为 0.303,其具有 85.3%的敏感性和 96.2%的特异性。APOE 4 携带者的 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值明显高于非携带者(F = 4.839,p = 0.015)。另一组独立的病例对照研究验证了 Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40(100%的敏感性和 83.3%的特异性)和 Aβ1-42(100%的敏感性和 75.3%的特异性)的这两个截断值。在亚组纵向随访研究中,我们发现血浆 Aβ 在大约 3 个月的间隔内相对稳定。总之,我们发现血浆 Aβ1-42 是 AD 的一种有用的生物标志物。Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 比值提高了血浆 Aβ 生物标志物的诊断能力。铁纳米颗粒和 IMR 提供了一种测量血浆 Aβ 的新方法,可作为神经退行性疾病诊断的重要临床工具。