Suppr超能文献

通过免疫磁珠减少法和临床指标评估帕金森病痴呆和路易体痴呆中的生物标志物

Biomarker Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Dementia and Dementia with Lewy Bodies by the Immunomagnetic Reduction Assay and Clinical Measures.

作者信息

Malaty Giovanni R, Decourt Boris, Shill Holly A, Sabbagh Marwan N

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Department of Pharmacology and Neurosciences, Health Sciences Center, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024 Oct 25;8(1):1361-1371. doi: 10.3233/ADR-240110. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Plasma biomarker assays provide an opportunity to reassess whether Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) plasma biomarkers are diagnostically useful.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) of plasma biomarkers could differentiate between patients with PDD and DLB and healthy patients when combined with established clinical testing measures.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 61 participants (12 PDD, 12 DLB, 37 controls) were analyzed using IMR to quantify amyloid-β 42 (Aβ), total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau at threonine 181 (p-tau181), and α-synuclein (α-syn). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to obtain sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve. Biomarker results were combined with clinical measures from the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Hoehn-Yahr stage to optimize diagnostic test performance.

RESULTS

Participants with PDD had higher α-syn than those with DLB and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their biomarker products Aβ×p-tau181 and Aβ×α-syn. Patients with DLB had higher p-tau181 than those with PDD and healthy participants and were distinguishable by their concentrations of α-syn×p-tau181. Plasma α-syn plus UPDRS versus either test alone increased sensitivity, specificity, and AUC when healthy patients were compared with those with PDD and DLB. Combined clinical examination scores and plasma biomarker products demonstrated utility in differentiating PDD from DLB when p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS, α-syn was combined with UPDRS, and α-syn×p-tau181 was combined with UPDRS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, IMR plasma p-tau181 and α-syn may discriminate between PDD and DLB when used in conjunction with clinical testing.

摘要

背景

血浆生物标志物检测为重新评估阿尔茨海默病、帕金森病痴呆(PDD)和路易体痴呆(DLB)的血浆生物标志物在诊断上是否有用提供了契机。

目的

我们假设,当血浆生物标志物的免疫磁珠法(IMR)与既定的临床检测方法相结合时,可区分PDD和DLB患者与健康患者。

方法

对61名参与者(12名PDD患者、12名DLB患者、37名对照者)的血浆样本进行IMR分析,以定量淀粉样β蛋白42(Aβ)、总tau蛋白(t-tau)、苏氨酸181位点磷酸化tau蛋白(p-tau181)和α-突触核蛋白(α-syn)。采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析来获取敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线下面积。将生物标志物结果与统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表和Hoehn-Yahr分级的临床指标相结合,以优化诊断测试性能。

结果

PDD患者的α-syn高于DLB患者和健康参与者,且可通过其生物标志物产物Aβ×p-tau181和Aβ×α-syn进行区分。DLB患者的p-tau181高于PDD患者和健康参与者,且可通过其α-syn×p-tau181浓度进行区分。与单独使用任一检测方法相比,当将健康患者与PDD和DLB患者进行比较时,血浆α-syn加上UPDRS可提高敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。当p-tau181与UPDRS相结合、α-syn与UPDRS相结合以及α-syn×p-tau181与UPDRS相结合时,联合临床检查评分和血浆生物标志物产物在区分PDD和DLB方面显示出效用。

结论

在这项初步研究中,IMR血浆p-tau181和α-syn与临床检测联合使用时,可能有助于区分PDD和DLB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e482/11530035/7c0a10c3ce66/adr-8-adr240110-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验