• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种主观幸福感的衡量标准:日重建法的简式版本。

Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method.

机构信息

Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043887. Epub 2012 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0043887
PMID:22952801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3428291/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study of well-being is becoming a priority in social sciences. The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM) was developed to assess affective states. The aim of the present study was to validate an abbreviated version of the DRM designed for administration in population studies, and to assess its test-retest properties.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

1560 adults from Jodhpur (India) were interviewed using an abbreviated version of the DRM, and a week later they were re-interviewed using the original long version of the DRM, after which the abbreviated version of the DRM was compared with the original version. A regression model considering interaction terms was employed to analyse the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on net affect. Test-retest reliability was assessed, and found to be moderate. Positive affect showed more test-retest reliability than negative affect, while net affect had more temporal stability than U-index. The affect of sets A, B, and C, taken together, had a moderate predictive ability compared with the affect obtained using the full version of the DRM: AUC = 0.67 for positive affect; 0.66 for net affect; 0.61 for negative affect; and 0.60 for the U-index. Household income, gender, and setting all had a significant impact on net affect.

CONCLUSIONS

Net affect and positive affect showed moderate temporal stability, whereas negative affect and the U-index showed fair temporal stability. Evaluating the affective state using the abbreviated version of the DRM provides a profile of the population similar to that of the full version. The results provide considerable support for using the short version of the DRM as an instrument to measure subjective well-being in large population surveys.

摘要

背景

幸福感研究正成为社会科学的一个重点。时间重构法(DRM)是为评估情感状态而开发的。本研究的目的是验证一种为人群研究设计的 DRM 缩写版,并评估其重测信度。

主要发现

来自印度焦特布尔的 1560 名成年人接受了 DRM 缩写版的访谈,一周后,他们使用 DRM 的原始长版本进行了重新访谈,然后将 DRM 的缩写版与原始版本进行比较。采用考虑交互项的回归模型来分析社会人口特征对净影响的影响。评估了重测信度,发现其为中度。正性情绪的重测信度高于负性情绪,而净影响的时间稳定性高于 U 指数。综合考虑 A、B 和 C 集的影响,与使用 DRM 完整版本获得的影响相比,具有中度预测能力:正性影响的 AUC 为 0.67;净影响的 AUC 为 0.66;负性影响的 AUC 为 0.61;U 指数的 AUC 为 0.60。家庭收入、性别和环境对净影响均有显著影响。

结论

净影响和正性影响具有中度的时间稳定性,而负性影响和 U 指数具有良好的时间稳定性。使用 DRM 缩写版评估情感状态可以提供与完整版本相似的人群概况。这些结果为使用 DRM 短版本作为测量主观幸福感的工具在大型人群调查中提供了充分的支持。

相似文献

1
Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method.验证一种主观幸福感的衡量标准:日重建法的简式版本。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043887. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
2
Multi-country evaluation of affective experience: validation of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method in seven countries.多国情感体验评估:七种语言简写版日回顾法的验证。
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 23;8(4):e61534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061534. Print 2013.
3
Psychometric Evaluation of the Hypogonadism Impact of Symptoms Questionnaire Short Form (HIS-Q-SF).性腺功能减退症状问卷简表(HIS-Q-SF)的心理测量学评估
J Sex Med. 2017 Aug;14(8):1046-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.05.013.
4
The Pemberton Happiness Index: Validation of the Universal Portuguese version in a large Brazilian sample.彭伯顿幸福指数:通用葡萄牙语版本在巴西大样本中的验证。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(38):e4915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004915.
5
Validity and Reliability of Tamil translated University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for Head and Neck Cancers.华盛顿大学头颈癌患者生活质量问卷泰米尔语译本的效度与信度
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):3649-3654. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.12.3649.
6
A new statistical model for the Day Reconstruction Method.一种新的时间重建法的统计模型。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;26(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1547. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
French-language version of the World Health Organization quality of life spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs instrument.世界卫生组织生活质量精神性、宗教信仰和个人信仰量表的法语版。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Apr 19;10:39. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-39.
8
Psychometric properties of the psychosocial screening instrument for physical trauma patients (PSIT).创伤后患者心理社会筛查工具(PSIT)的心理计量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Nov 12;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1234-6.
9
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
10
The Ostomy-Q: Development and Psychometric Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Outcomes Associated with Ostomy Appliances.造口术问卷(Ostomy-Q):一种评估与造口器具相关结果的工具的开发及心理测量学验证
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(1):12-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Bedtime negative affect, sleep quality and subjective health in rural China.中国农村的睡前负面情绪、睡眠质量和主观健康。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17779-5.
2
Factors influencing adherence to non-communicable disease medication in India: secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from WHO - SAGE2.影响印度非传染性疾病药物依从性的因素:来自世界卫生组织全球成人健康调查第二轮(WHO - SAGE2)横断面数据的二次分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 13;14:1183818. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1183818. eCollection 2023.
3
Deconstructing Gender Differences in Experienced Well-Being Among Older Adults in the Developing World: The Roles of Time Use and Activity-Specific Affective Experiences.剖析发展中世界老年人幸福感体验中的性别差异:时间利用和特定活动情感体验的作用。
Soc Indic Res. 2022;160(2-3):757-790. doi: 10.1007/s11205-020-02435-3. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
4
Subjective Wellbeing in Rural China: How Social Environments Influence the Diurnal Rhythms of Affect.中国农村地区的主观幸福感:社会环境如何影响情感的昼夜节律。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;18(8):4132. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084132.
5
As cold as a fish? Relationships between the Dark Triad personality traits and affective experience during the day: A day reconstruction study.像鱼一样冷漠?黑暗人格特质与白天情感体验的关系:一项日间重构研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 25;15(2):e0229625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229625. eCollection 2020.
6
Association of experienced and evaluative well-being with health in nine countries with different income levels: a cross-sectional study.九个不同收入水平国家中经验性幸福感和评估性幸福感与健康的关联:一项横断面研究
Global Health. 2017 Aug 23;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0290-0.
7
The dynamic relationship between emotional and physical states: an observational study of personal health records.情绪状态与身体状态之间的动态关系:一项关于个人健康记录的观察性研究。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017 Feb 9;13:411-419. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S120995. eCollection 2017.
8
Can Early Intervention Improve Maternal Well-Being? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial.早期干预能否改善孕产妇健康状况?来自一项随机对照试验的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):e0169829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169829. eCollection 2017.
9
A new statistical model for the Day Reconstruction Method.一种新的时间重建法的统计模型。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;26(4). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1547. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Health and happiness: cross-sectional household surveys in Finland, Poland and Spain.健康与幸福:芬兰、波兰和西班牙的横断面家庭调查
Bull World Health Organ. 2014 Oct 1;92(10):716-25. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129254. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional reactivity to daily events in major and minor depression.重性和轻性抑郁症患者对日常事件的情绪反应。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Feb;120(1):155-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021662.
2
A Comparison of Affect Ratings Obtained with Ecological Momentary Assessment and the Day Reconstruction Method.通过生态瞬时评估法和日重建法获得的情感评分比较。
Soc Indic Res. 2010 Nov;99(2):269-283. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9578-7.
3
Wealth and happiness across the world: material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling.全球范围内的财富与幸福:物质繁荣预示着生活评价,而心理社会繁荣预示着积极的感觉。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jul;99(1):52-61. doi: 10.1037/a0018066.
4
Economics. Measuring subjective well-being.经济学。衡量主观幸福感。
Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):534-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1186315.
5
The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures.主观幸福感测量的可靠性。
J Public Econ. 2008 Aug;92(8-9):1833-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.12.015.
6
Accounting for the richness of daily activities.考虑到日常活动的丰富性。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Aug;20(8):1000-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02392.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
7
Assessment of pain: a community-based diary survey in the USA.疼痛评估:美国一项基于社区的日记调查
Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1519-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60656-X.
8
An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.当金标准为连续尺度时诊断准确性的一种ROC类测量方法。
Stat Med. 2006 Feb 15;25(3):481-93. doi: 10.1002/sim.2228.
9
A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method.一种描述日常生活体验的调查方法:日记重建法。
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1776-80. doi: 10.1126/science.1103572.
10
Delta: a new measure of agreement between two raters.德尔塔:评估两位评分者之间一致性的一种新方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2004 May;57(Pt 1):1-19. doi: 10.1348/000711004849268.