• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作基因调控的群体遗传学。

The population genetics of cooperative gene regulation.

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Sep 6;12:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-173.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2148-12-173
PMID:22954408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3537746/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changes in gene regulatory networks drive the evolution of phenotypic diversity both within and between species. Rewiring of transcriptional networks is achieved either by changes to transcription factor binding sites or by changes to the physical interactions among transcription factor proteins. It has been suggested that the evolution of cooperative binding among factors can facilitate the adaptive rewiring of a regulatory network.

RESULTS

We use a population-genetic model to explore when cooperative binding of transcription factors is favored by evolution, and what effects cooperativity then has on the adaptive re-writing of regulatory networks. We consider a pair of transcription factors that regulate multiple targets and overlap in the sets of target genes they regulate. We show that, under stabilising selection, cooperative binding between the transcription factors is favoured provided the amount of overlap between their target genes exceeds a threshold. The value of this threshold depends on several population-genetic factors: strength of selection on binding sites, cost of pleiotropy associated with protein-protein interactions, rates of mutation and population size. Once it is established, we find that cooperative binding of transcription factors significantly accelerates the adaptive rewiring of transcriptional networks under positive selection. We compare our qualitative predictions to systematic data on Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription factors, their binding sites, and their protein-protein interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals a rich set of evolutionary dynamics driven by a tradeoff between the beneficial effects of cooperative binding at targets shared by a pair of factors, and the detrimental effects of cooperative binding for non-shared targets. We find that cooperative regulation will evolve when transcription factors share a sufficient proportion of their target genes. These findings help to explain empirical pattens in datasets of transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and, they suggest that changes to physical interactions between transcription factors can play a critical role in the evolution of gene regulatory networks.

摘要

背景

基因调控网络的变化推动了物种内和物种间表型多样性的进化。转录网络的重新布线要么通过改变转录因子结合位点来实现,要么通过改变转录因子蛋白之间的物理相互作用来实现。有人认为,因子之间协同结合的进化可以促进调控网络的适应性重新布线。

结果

我们使用群体遗传模型来探索转录因子的协同结合何时受到进化的青睐,以及协同作用随后对调控网络的适应性重写有什么影响。我们考虑一对调节多个靶标的转录因子,它们在调节的靶基因集合中重叠。我们表明,在稳定选择下,只要它们的靶基因之间的重叠量超过一个阈值,转录因子之间的协同结合就会受到青睐。这个阈值的值取决于几个群体遗传因素:结合位点的选择强度、与蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用相关的多效性成本、突变率和种群大小。一旦建立起来,我们发现,转录因子的协同结合显著加速了正选择下转录网络的适应性重写。我们将我们的定性预测与酿酒酵母转录因子及其结合位点和蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用的系统数据进行了比较。

结论

我们的研究揭示了一组丰富的进化动态,这些动态是由一对因子共享的靶标上协同结合的有益效应与非共享靶标上协同结合的有害效应之间的权衡驱动的。我们发现,当转录因子共享足够比例的靶基因时,协同调节将进化。这些发现有助于解释酿酒酵母转录因子数据集的经验模式,并且表明转录因子之间物理相互作用的改变可以在基因调控网络的进化中发挥关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/0cb3892a6df5/1471-2148-12-173-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/7c7b326a2184/1471-2148-12-173-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/ce4d70906a31/1471-2148-12-173-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/e85e37968e1a/1471-2148-12-173-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/17e2cd8b59cd/1471-2148-12-173-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/0cb3892a6df5/1471-2148-12-173-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/7c7b326a2184/1471-2148-12-173-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/ce4d70906a31/1471-2148-12-173-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/e85e37968e1a/1471-2148-12-173-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/17e2cd8b59cd/1471-2148-12-173-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dc7/3537746/0cb3892a6df5/1471-2148-12-173-5.jpg

相似文献

1
The population genetics of cooperative gene regulation.合作基因调控的群体遗传学。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Sep 6;12:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-173.
2
Evolution of transcriptional networks in yeast: alternative teams of transcriptional factors for different species.酵母中转录网络的进化:不同物种的转录因子替代组合
BMC Genomics. 2016 Nov 11;17(Suppl 10):826. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3102-7.
3
Adaptive evolution of transcription factor binding sites.转录因子结合位点的适应性进化。
BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Oct 28;4:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-42.
4
The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes.遗传网络通过非适应性过程的进化。
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Oct;8(10):803-13. doi: 10.1038/nrg2192.
5
The evolution of complex gene regulation by low-specificity binding sites.低特异性结合位点的复杂基因调控的进化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Aug 14;280(1768):20131313. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1313. Print 2013 Oct 7.
6
Identifying cooperative transcription factors in yeast using multiple data sources.利用多种数据源鉴定酵母中的协同转录因子。
BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S2. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S5-S2. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
7
ncDNA and drift drive binding site accumulation.非编码 DNA 与漂变驱动结合位点积累。
BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Aug 30;12:159. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-159.
8
Expected rates and modes of evolution of enhancer sequences.增强子序列的预期进化速率和模式。
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):1064-73. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh105. Epub 2004 Mar 10.
9
Properly defining the targets of a transcription factor significantly improves the computational identification of cooperative transcription factor pairs in yeast.正确定义转录因子的靶标可显著提高酵母中协同转录因子对的计算识别能力。
BMC Genomics. 2015;16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-16-S12-S10. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
10
A functional selection model explains evolutionary robustness despite plasticity in regulatory networks.功能选择模型解释了尽管调控网络具有可塑性,但仍能保持进化稳健性。
Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:619. doi: 10.1038/msb.2012.50.

引用本文的文献

1
The rewiring of transcription circuits in evolution.转录电路在进化中的重布线。
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2017 Dec;47:121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
2
Inference of time-delayed gene regulatory networks based on dynamic Bayesian network hybrid learning method.基于动态贝叶斯网络混合学习方法的时间延迟基因调控网络推理
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 23;8(46):80373-80392. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21268. eCollection 2017 Oct 6.
3
Simulations of enhancer evolution provide mechanistic insights into gene regulation.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of molecular error rates and the consequences for evolvability.分子错误率的演变及其对可进化性的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jan 18;108(3):1082-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012918108. Epub 2011 Jan 3.
2
Is transcription factor binding site turnover a sufficient explanation for cis-regulatory sequence divergence?转录因子结合位点替换能否充分解释顺式调控序列的分化?
Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:851-8. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq066. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
3
Identifying cooperative transcription factors by combining ChIP-chip data and knockout data.
增强子进化的模拟为基因调控提供了机制上的见解。
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Jan;31(1):184-200. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst170. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
通过整合染色质免疫沉淀芯片数据和基因敲除数据来鉴定协同转录因子。
Cell Res. 2010 Nov;20(11):1276-8. doi: 10.1038/cr.2010.146. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
4
Thermodynamics-based models of transcriptional regulation by enhancers: the roles of synergistic activation, cooperative binding and short-range repression.基于热力学的增强子转录调控模型:协同激活、合作结合和短程抑制的作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Sep 16;6(9):e1000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000935.
5
Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation.突变稳定性可以促进适应。
Nature. 2010 Jan 21;463(7279):353-5. doi: 10.1038/nature08694.
6
Degree dependence in rates of transcription factor evolution explains the unusual structure of transcription networks.转录因子进化速率中的程度依赖性解释了转录网络的异常结构。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 7;276(1666):2493-501. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0210. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
7
Models of transcription factor binding: sensitivity of activation functions to model assumptions.转录因子结合模型:激活函数对模型假设的敏感性。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Apr 7;257(3):419-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.11.026. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
8
Dominance and the evolutionary accumulation of cis- and trans-effects on gene expression.显性以及顺式和反式作用对基因表达的进化积累。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14471-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805160105. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
9
Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution.重塑转录因子变化在发育进化中的作用。
Evolution. 2008 Sep;62(9):2131-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00440.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
10
The gene regulatory logic of transcription factor evolution.转录因子进化的基因调控逻辑。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Jul;23(7):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.006. Epub 2008 May 22.