• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公立精神病医院中隔离与约束措施的使用:患者特征及机构影响

Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects.

作者信息

Way B B, Banks S M

机构信息

Bureau of Survey and Evaluation Research, New York State Office of Mental Health, NY 12229.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;41(1):75-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.1.75.

DOI:10.1176/ps.41.1.75
PMID:2295482
Abstract

Use of seclusion and restraint in 23 adult public psychiatric hospitals in New York State was examined by comparing demographic and diagnostic characteristics of 657 patients who were secluded or restrained during a four-week period with characteristics of 22,939 patients who were not. Logit analysis was used to calculate the probability of seclusion and restraint of individual patients with various combinations of characteristics. Characteristics associated with high probabilities included age less than 26 years, length of stay from 30 to 365 days, involuntary legal status, female gender, a diagnosis of mental retardation, and residence in a hospital with a high rate of seclusion and restraint. The rate of seclusion and restrain in the 23 hospitals ranged from .4 to 9.4 percent of patients. Both patient characteristics and the hospital of residence were needed to explain the case-by-case probability of a patient's being secluded or restrained.

摘要

通过比较纽约州23家成人公立精神病医院中在四周内被隔离或约束的657名患者的人口统计学和诊断特征与22939名未被隔离或约束患者的特征,对隔离和约束的使用情况进行了研究。采用逻辑回归分析来计算具有各种特征组合的个体患者被隔离和约束的概率。与高概率相关的特征包括年龄小于26岁、住院时间为30至365天、非自愿法律状态、女性、智力发育迟缓诊断以及居住在隔离和约束率高的医院。这23家医院的隔离和约束率在患者的0.4%至9.4%之间。患者特征和居住医院都需要用来解释患者被隔离或约束的逐案概率。

相似文献

1
Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects.公立精神病医院中隔离与约束措施的使用:患者特征及机构影响
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;41(1):75-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.1.75.
2
Use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatric settings in New York State.纽约州精神科环境中约束和隔离的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1032-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1032.
3
Influence of patient characteristics on duration of seclusion/restrain in acute psychiatric settings in Japan.日本急性精神科环境中患者特征对隔离/约束时间的影响。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Sep;67(6):405-11. doi: 10.1111/pcn.12078. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
Decreasing the use of restraint and seclusion among psychiatric inpatients.减少精神科住院患者的约束和隔离使用。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2007 Sep;13(5):308-17. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000290669.10107.ba.
5
Who are the restrained and secluded patients: a 15-year nationwide study.约束和隐居的患者是谁:一项为期 15 年的全国性研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;45(11):1087-93. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0150-1. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
6
Prevalence and correlates of seclusion with or without restraint in a Canadian psychiatric hospital: a 2-year retrospective audit.在加拿大一家精神病院,单独隔离和(或)约束的流行情况及其相关因素:一项为期 2 年的回顾性审计。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Jun;18(5):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01679.x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
7
Variations in seclusion and restraint practices by hospital location.不同医院地理位置的隔离与约束措施差异。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;39(4):418-23. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.4.418.
8
Pennsylvania State Hospital system's seclusion and restraint reduction program.宾夕法尼亚州立医院系统的减少隔离与约束计划。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Sep;56(9):1115-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1115.
9
Seclusion and restraint and prediction of violence.隔离与约束以及暴力行为的预测
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):229-32. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.2.229.
10
Variation among state hospitals in use of seclusion and restraint.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;36(6):648-52. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.6.648.

引用本文的文献

1
The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review.住院非自愿精神科治疗的利弊:一项范围综述
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Sep 17;32(5):734-781. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2024.2346734. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of coercive measures in different psychiatric hospitals: the impact of institutional characteristics.不同精神病院强制性措施的评估:机构特征的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 21;21(1):419. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03410-z.
3
How patients' characteristics influence the use of coercive measures.
患者的特征如何影响强制措施的使用。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;59(4):429-434. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_100_17.
4
Listening to the Patient Perspective: Psychiatric Inpatients' Attitudes Towards Physical Restraint.倾听患者视角:精神科住院患者对身体约束的态度。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):691-696. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9565-8.
5
Characteristics of adolescents frequently restrained in acute psychiatric units in Norway: a nationwide study.挪威青少年在急性精神科病房中频繁受到约束的特征:一项全国性研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2017 Jan 12;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s13034-016-0136-1. eCollection 2017.
6
Predictors of physical restraint in a psychiatric emergency setting.精神科急诊环境中身体约束的预测因素。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Nov 17;29:296. eCollection 2015.
7
Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study.患者及病房相关特征会影响强制措施的使用吗?EUNOMIA国际研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):1619-29. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0872-6. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
Who is Subjected to Coercive Measures as a Psychiatric Inpatient? A Multi-Level Analysis.哪些人会作为精神科住院患者受到强制措施?多层次分析。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2013 Jul 12;9:110-9. doi: 10.2174/1745017901309010110. eCollection 2013.
9
Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain?不同入院病房的隔离率差异:患者构成能解释吗?
Psychiatr Q. 2013 Mar;84(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11126-012-9225-3.
10
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.横断面前瞻性研究:精神科急性病房的隔离、约束和非自愿药物治疗:患者、工作人员和病房特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 6;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-89.