• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隔离与约束以及暴力行为的预测

Seclusion and restraint and prediction of violence.

作者信息

Phillips P, Nasr S J

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):229-32. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.2.229.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.140.2.229
PMID:6849442
Abstract

The authors studied the use of seclusion and restraint on an inpatient unit in a state psychiatric hospital. Of 69 randomly selected inpatients, 51% experienced seclusion or restraint at least once. More psychotic than nonpsychotic patients required seclusion or restraint. However, neither psychosis/nonpsychosis nor voluntary/involuntary admission status predicted the likelihood of violent threats or actions. Patients experiencing seclusion and restraint showed a nonsignificant trend toward longer mean length of stay in the hospital. The frequency of patient behavior leading to seclusion or restraint appeared to be directly related to the stimulation caused by the presence of many staff members and other patients.

摘要

作者们研究了在一家州立精神病医院的住院部使用隔离和约束措施的情况。在随机抽取的69名住院患者中,51%的患者至少经历过一次隔离或约束。与非精神病患者相比,精神病患者更需要隔离或约束。然而,无论是精神病/非精神病状态还是自愿/非自愿入院状态,都无法预测暴力威胁或行为的可能性。经历过隔离和约束的患者平均住院时间有延长的趋势,但差异不显著。导致隔离或约束的患者行为频率似乎与众多工作人员和其他患者在场所造成的刺激直接相关。

相似文献

1
Seclusion and restraint and prediction of violence.隔离与约束以及暴力行为的预测
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):229-32. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.2.229.
2
Decreasing the use of restraint and seclusion among psychiatric inpatients.减少精神科住院患者的约束和隔离使用。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2007 Sep;13(5):308-17. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000290669.10107.ba.
3
Prevalence and correlates of seclusion with or without restraint in a Canadian psychiatric hospital: a 2-year retrospective audit.在加拿大一家精神病院,单独隔离和(或)约束的流行情况及其相关因素:一项为期 2 年的回顾性审计。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011 Jun;18(5):394-402. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01679.x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
4
Seclusion and restraint in 1985: a review and update.1985年的隔离与约束:综述及更新
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;36(6):652-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.6.652.
5
Frequency of seclusion in an adolescent psychiatric unit.青少年精神科病房的隔离频率
J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;44(7):238-41.
6
A comparison of patient and staff attitudes toward seclusion.患者与医护人员对隔离态度的比较。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1985 May;173(5):282-91. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198505000-00006.
7
Inpatient seclusion: description and causes.住院隔离:描述与原因
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(3):421-30.
8
Prevalence and precursors of the use of restraint and seclusion in a private psychiatric hospital: comparison of child and adolescent patients.在一家私立精神病院,约束和隔离的使用情况及其相关因素:儿童和青少年患者的比较。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2013 May;40(3):224-31. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0396-2.
9
Staff opinions about seclusion and restraint at a state forensic hospital.一家州立法医医院工作人员对隔离与约束措施的看法。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;45(2):138-41. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.2.138.
10
Understanding involuntary hospitalization and use of seclusion and restraint.了解非自愿住院治疗以及隔离和约束措施的使用情况。
Nurse Pract. 2012 Jun 10;37(6):13-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000412902.24878.92.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical restraint in mental health nursing: A concept analysis.精神科护理中的身体约束:一项概念分析。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Apr 20;6(3):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.04.002. eCollection 2019 Jul 10.
2
TREC-SAVE: a randomised trial comparing mechanical restraints with use of seclusion for aggressive or violent seriously mentally ill people: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.TREC-SAVE 试验:一项比较机械约束与隔离用于治疗有攻击或暴力行为的严重精神疾病患者的随机试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Jul 20;12:180. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-180.
3
Restrained psychiatric outpatients: necessity, justification or violation of human rights?
约束性精神科门诊患者:必要、合理还是侵犯人权?
Indian J Psychiatry. 1993 Apr;35(2):115-8.
4
Risk factors for psychiatric inpatient assaults on staff.精神科住院患者袭击工作人员的风险因素。
J Ment Health Adm. 1994 Winter;21(1):24-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02521342.
5
Physical control of patients on an inpatient setting: forensic vs. civil populations.住院环境中对患者的身体控制:法医鉴定人群与民事人群
Psychiatr Q. 1995 Summer;66(2):133-45. doi: 10.1007/BF02238860.