• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同医院地理位置的隔离与约束措施差异。

Variations in seclusion and restraint practices by hospital location.

作者信息

Carpenter M D, Hannon V R, McCleery G, Wanderling J A

机构信息

Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York 10962.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;39(4):418-23. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.4.418.

DOI:10.1176/ps.39.4.418
PMID:3371909
Abstract

Data from a survey of seclusion and restraint practices in New York state hospitals were analyzed to determine if they differed by hospital location. The study included 19 hospitals--five in New York City, four in New York City suburbs, three in large towns, and seven in small towns. Overall, New York City and large-town hospitals had the highest rates of seclusion and restraint, but analysis by age group showed that New York City had the lowest rate for patients under age 35, who constituted the majority of patients who were secluded or restrained, and large towns had the highest rate. Compared with suburban and small-town hospitals, city and large-town hospitals used seclusion more often than restraint and had a higher ward census and a lower-staff patient ratio. In all groups males and blacks were overrepresented compared with the hospital population. The authors believe clarification of regional variations in assaultive behavior is important for treatment and system planning.

摘要

对纽约州医院隔离和约束措施的一项调查数据进行了分析,以确定这些措施是否因医院所在位置而异。该研究涵盖了19家医院——5家位于纽约市,4家位于纽约市郊区,3家位于大城镇,7家位于小城镇。总体而言,纽约市和大城镇医院的隔离和约束率最高,但按年龄组分析显示,纽约市35岁以下患者的比率最低,而35岁以下患者占被隔离或约束患者的大多数,大城镇的比率最高。与郊区和小城镇医院相比,城市和大城镇医院更常使用隔离而非约束,且病房普查人数更多,医患比例更低。在所有组中,与医院总体人群相比,男性和黑人的占比过高。作者认为,明确攻击性行为的地区差异对于治疗和系统规划很重要。

相似文献

1
Variations in seclusion and restraint practices by hospital location.不同医院地理位置的隔离与约束措施差异。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;39(4):418-23. doi: 10.1176/ps.39.4.418.
2
Use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatric settings in New York State.纽约州精神科环境中约束和隔离的使用情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1032-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1032.
3
Use of seclusion and restraint in public psychiatric hospitals: patient characteristics and facility effects.公立精神病医院中隔离与约束措施的使用:患者特征及机构影响
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;41(1):75-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.41.1.75.
4
Ethnic differences in seclusion and restraint.隔离与约束方面的种族差异。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988 Dec;176(12):726-31. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198812000-00005.
5
Pennsylvania State Hospital system's seclusion and restraint reduction program.宾夕法尼亚州立医院系统的减少隔离与约束计划。
Psychiatr Serv. 2005 Sep;56(9):1115-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.56.9.1115.
6
Decreasing the use of restraint and seclusion among psychiatric inpatients.减少精神科住院患者的约束和隔离使用。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2007 Sep;13(5):308-17. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000290669.10107.ba.
7
Predictors of Seclusion and Restraint Following Injurious Assaults on Psychiatric Units.伤害性攻击后被隔离和约束的预测因素。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):562-567. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000657.
8
Seclusion and restraint and prediction of violence.隔离与约束以及暴力行为的预测
Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Feb;140(2):229-32. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.2.229.
9
Seclusion and restraint in 1985: a review and update.1985年的隔离与约束:综述及更新
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985 Jun;36(6):652-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.36.6.652.
10
A national survey on seclusion and restraint in state psychiatric hospitals.一项关于州立精神病医院隔离与约束措施的全国性调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 Oct;46(10):1026-31. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.10.1026.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the staff attitude to coercion scale: an exploratory factor analysis.意大利版工作人员对强制态度量表的心理测量特性:探索性因素分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1172803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1172803. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship between ethnic background and the use of restrictive practices to manage incidents of violence or aggression in psychiatric inpatient settings.民族背景与在精神科住院环境中使用限制措施来管理暴力或攻击事件之间的关系。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(5):1221-1233. doi: 10.1111/inm.12873. Epub 2021 Jun 27.
3
How patients' characteristics influence the use of coercive measures.
患者的特征如何影响强制措施的使用。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct-Dec;59(4):429-434. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_100_17.
4
Staff and caregiver attitude to coercion in India.印度工作人员及护理人员对强制手段的态度。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S221-S229. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196847.
5
Perceived coercion in persons with mental disorder in India: A cross-sectional study.印度精神障碍患者中的感知性强制:一项横断面研究。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;58(Suppl 2):S210-S220. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196846.
6
Do patient and ward-related characteristics influence the use of coercive measures? Results from the EUNOMIA international study.患者及病房相关特征会影响强制措施的使用吗?EUNOMIA国际研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):1619-29. doi: 10.1007/s00127-014-0872-6. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
7
The nature and extent of the use of physical restraint and seclusion in psychiatric practice: Report of a survey.精神科实践中身体约束和隔离的性质和范围:调查报告。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;45(3):155-7.
8
Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards.工作人员对急性精神病病房使用强制手段的态度和想法。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;46(9):893-901. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0259-2. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
9
A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics.横断面前瞻性研究:精神科急性病房的隔离、约束和非自愿药物治疗:患者、工作人员和病房特点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 6;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-89.
10
No evidence for restrictive care practices in Măori admitted to a New Zealand psychiatric inpatient unit: do specialist cultural teams have a role?在新西兰一家精神病住院部收治的毛利人患者中,没有证据表明存在限制性护理措施:专业文化团队是否能发挥作用?
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008 May;43(5):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s00127-008-0320-6.