State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Environ Monit Assess. 2013 May;185(5):3993-4003. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2844-1. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Increasing evidences show that inhalation of indoor bioaerosols has caused numerous adverse health effects and diseases. However, the bioaerosol size distribution, composition, and concentration level, representing different inhalation risks, could vary with different living environments. The six-stage Andersen sampler is designed to simulate the sampling of different human lung regions. Here, the sampler was used in investigating the bioaerosol exposure in six different environments (student dorm, hospital, laboratory, hotel room, dining hall, and outdoor environment) in Beijing. During the sampling, the Andersen sampler was operated for 30 min for each sample, and three independent experiments were performed for each of the environments. The air samples collected onto each of the six stages of the sampler were incubated on agar plates directly at 26 °C, and the colony forming units (CFU) were manually counted and statistically corrected. In addition, the developed CFUs were washed off the agar plates and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for diversity analysis. Results revealed that for most environments investigated, the culturable bacterial aerosol concentrations were higher than those of culturable fungal aerosols. The culturable bacterial and fungal aerosol fractions, concentration, size distribution, and diversity were shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. PCR-DGGE analysis indicated that different environments had different culturable bacterial aerosol compositions as revealed by distinct gel band patterns. For most environments tested, larger (>3 μm) culturable bacterial aerosols with a skewed size distribution were shown to prevail, accounting for more than 60 %, while for culturable fungal aerosols with a normal size distribution, those 2.1-4.7 μm dominated, accounting for 20-40 %. Alternaria, Cladosporium, Chaetomium, and Aspergillus were found abundant in most environments studied here. Viable microbial load per unit of particulate matter was also shown to vary significantly with the sampling environments. The results from this study suggested that different environments even with similar levels of total microbial culturable aerosol concentrations could present different inhalation risks due to different bioaerosol particle size distribution and composition. This work fills literature gaps regarding bioaerosol size and composition-based exposure risks in different human dwellings in contrast to a vast body of total bioaerosol levels.
越来越多的证据表明,室内生物气溶胶的吸入会导致许多不良健康影响和疾病。然而,生物气溶胶的大小分布、组成和浓度水平,代表着不同的吸入风险,可能因不同的生活环境而有所不同。六阶段安德森采样器旨在模拟不同人体肺部区域的采样。在这里,该采样器被用于调查北京六个不同环境(学生宿舍、医院、实验室、酒店房间、餐厅和室外环境)中的生物气溶胶暴露情况。在采样过程中,每个样品的安德森采样器运行 30 分钟,每个环境进行三次独立实验。收集到采样器六个阶段的空气样本直接在 26°C 的琼脂平板上培养,通过人工计数并进行统计校正,计算出菌落形成单位(CFU)。此外,将培养出来的 CFU 从琼脂平板上洗脱下来,进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)-变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)多样性分析。结果表明,对于大多数调查的环境,可培养细菌气溶胶的浓度高于可培养真菌气溶胶。可培养细菌和真菌气溶胶的分数、浓度、大小分布和多样性都随着采样环境的变化而显著变化。PCR-DGGE 分析表明,不同的环境具有不同的可培养细菌气溶胶组成,这表现为不同的凝胶带模式。对于大多数测试环境,较大(>3μm)的可培养细菌气溶胶具有倾斜的大小分布,占比超过 60%,而对于具有正态大小分布的可培养真菌气溶胶,2.1-4.7μm 占主导地位,占 20-40%。链格孢属、枝孢属、嗜热子囊菌属和曲霉属在大多数研究的环境中都很丰富。单位颗粒物上的微生物有效负荷也与采样环境有显著差异。本研究结果表明,不同的环境,即使总微生物可培养气溶胶浓度相似,由于生物气溶胶粒径分布和组成的不同,也可能带来不同的吸入风险。这项工作填补了不同人类居住环境中基于生物气溶胶大小和组成的暴露风险的文献空白,而这些风险与大量的总生物气溶胶水平有关。