Suppr超能文献

难治性呼吸困难的药物治疗:一项系统文献综述

[Pharmacological therapy of refractory dyspnoea : a systematic literature review].

作者信息

Simon S T, Köskeroglu P, Bausewein C

机构信息

Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Klinisches Studienzentrum Palliativmedizin (BMBF 01KN1106), Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2012 Sep;26(5):515-22. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1228-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of breathlessness in patients with life-limiting diseases is still difficult and complex. This systematic review aims to summarize and analyze clinical trials of four different treatment options (opioids, benzodiazepines, corticosteroids and oxygen) for the relief of breathlessness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review based on database searching of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library was carried out and experts in the field were contacted. The search was conducted in July 2011. Included were systematic reviews, controlled and randomized controlled clinical trials in patients suffering from breathlessness due to advanced disease. Studies were selected, extracted and the data analyzed by two independent reviewers using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 2,559 hits. Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials were included. Opioids (oral and parenteral) were the only drug group with evidence for relief of breathlessness. Benzodiazepines failed to show a significant effect for the relief of breathlessness intensity but demonstrated a tendency towards benefit. No studies were identified assessing steroids. There is no additional benefit from oxygen compared to room air in non-hypoxemic cancer patients but there is a statistically significant benefit of oxygen in non-hypoxemic COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

Oral and parenteral opioids seem to be effective for the relief of breathlessness and should be the first choice for pharmacological treatment. Benzodiazepines should be used with reservation. There is not enough evidence for the use of steroids except for COPD patients. Non-hypoxemic cancer patients do not benefit from oxygen. The English full text version of this article will be available in SpringerLink as of November 2012 (under "Supplemental").

摘要

背景

对患有终末期疾病患者的呼吸急促症状进行管理仍然困难且复杂。本系统评价旨在总结和分析四种不同治疗方案(阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物、皮质类固醇和氧气)缓解呼吸急促症状的临床试验。

材料与方法

基于对Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库的检索开展了一项系统评价,并联系了该领域的专家。检索于2011年7月进行。纳入的研究包括针对因晚期疾病导致呼吸急促患者的系统评价、对照及随机对照临床试验。由两名独立的评价者进行研究选择、数据提取及分析,并采用叙述性综合分析方法。

结果

检索共获得2559条结果。纳入了5篇系统评价和10项随机对照试验。阿片类药物(口服和胃肠外给药)是唯一有证据表明可缓解呼吸急促症状的药物组。苯二氮䓬类药物未能显示出对缓解呼吸急促强度有显著效果,但显示出有益的趋势。未发现评估类固醇的研究。对于非低氧血症的癌症患者,与室内空气相比,吸氧无额外益处,但对于非低氧血症的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,吸氧有统计学意义的益处。

结论

口服和胃肠外给药的阿片类药物似乎对缓解呼吸急促有效,应作为药物治疗的首选。苯二氮䓬类药物应谨慎使用。除COPD患者外,使用类固醇的证据不足。非低氧血症的癌症患者不能从吸氧中获益。本文的英文全文版本将于2012年11月在SpringerLink上提供(在“补充材料”下)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验