Suppr超能文献

选择性 V(1a)激动剂可减轻绵羊严重脓毒症的血管功能障碍和液体蓄积。

Selective V(1a) agonism attenuates vascular dysfunction and fluid accumulation in ovine severe sepsis.

机构信息

Investigational Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012 Nov 15;303(10):H1245-54. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00390.2012. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Abstract

Vasopressin analogs are used as a supplement to norepinephrine in septic shock. The isolated effects of vasopressin agonists on sepsis-induced vascular dysfunction, however, remain controversial. Because V(2)-receptor stimulation induces vasodilation and procoagulant effects, a higher V(1a)- versus V(2)-receptor selectivity might be advantageous. We therefore hypothesized that a sole, titrated infusion of the selective V(1a)-agonist Phe(2)-Orn(8)-Vasotocin (POV) is more effective than the mixed V(1a)-/V(2)-agonist AVP for the treatment of vascular and cardiopulmonary dysfunction in methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus pneumonia-induced, ovine sepsis. After the onset of hemodynamic instability, awake, chronically instrumented, mechanically ventilated, and fluid resuscitated sheep were randomly assigned to receive continuous infusions of either POV, AVP, or saline solution (control; each n = 6). AVP and POV were titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure above baseline - 10 mmHg. When compared with that of control animals, AVP and POV reduced neutrophil migration (myeloperoxidase activity, alveolar neutrophils) and plasma levels of nitric oxide, resulting in higher mean arterial pressures and a reduced vascular leakage (net fluid balance, chest and abdominal fluid, pulmonary bloodless wet-to-dry-weight ratio, alveolar and septal edema). Notably, POV stabilized hemodynamics at lower doses than AVP. In addition, POV, but not AVP, reduced myocardial and pulmonary tissue concentrations of 3-nitrotyrosine, VEGF, and angiopoietin-2, thereby leading to an abolishment of cumulative fluid accumulation (POV, 9 ± 15 ml/kg vs. AVP, 110 ± 13 ml/kg vs. control, 213 ± 16 ml/kg; P < 0.001 each) and an attenuated cardiopulmonary dysfunction (left ventricular stroke work index, PaO(2)-to-FiO(2) ratio) versus control animals. Highly selective V(1a)-agonism appears to be superior to unselective vasopressin analogs for the treatment of sepsis-induced vascular dysfunction.

摘要

血管加压素类似物被用作脓毒性休克中去甲肾上腺素的补充。然而,血管加压素激动剂对脓毒症引起的血管功能障碍的单独作用仍存在争议。因为 V2-受体刺激可引起血管扩张和促凝作用,因此更高的 V1a-与 V2-受体选择性可能更有利。因此,我们假设单独滴定输注选择性 V1a-激动剂 Phe2-Orn8-Vasotocin(POV)比混合 V1a-/V2-激动剂 AVP 更有效地治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎诱导的绵羊败血症中的血管和心肺功能障碍。在出现血流动力学不稳定后,将清醒、长期仪器化、机械通气和液体复苏的绵羊随机分配接受 POV、AVP 或生理盐水(对照;每组 n = 6)的连续输注。AVP 和 POV 被滴定以维持平均动脉压高于基线-10mmHg。与对照组动物相比,AVP 和 POV 减少了中性粒细胞迁移(髓过氧化物酶活性、肺泡中性粒细胞)和一氧化氮的血浆水平,导致平均动脉压升高和血管渗漏减少(净液体平衡、胸部和腹部液体、肺无血湿重比、肺泡和隔水肿)。值得注意的是,与 AVP 相比,POV 以较低的剂量稳定了血流动力学。此外,POV 但不是 AVP 降低了心肌和肺组织中 3-硝基酪氨酸、VEGF 和血管生成素-2 的浓度,从而消除了累积液体积聚(POV,9±15ml/kg vs. AVP,110±13ml/kg vs. 对照组,213±16ml/kg;p<0.001)和心肺功能障碍减弱(左心室每搏功指数,PaO2-to-FiO2 比值)与对照组动物相比。高度选择性的 V1a-激动剂似乎优于非选择性血管加压素类似物治疗脓毒症引起的血管功能障碍。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验