Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Dairy Res. 2012 Nov;79(4):436-44. doi: 10.1017/S0022029912000519. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
The overall objective of this study was to investigate how relevant research publications address the validity of diagnostic methods for acute puerperal metritis (APM) in dairy cows, a disease commonly treated with antibiotic drugs. Therefore, a literature search was conducted in Journal of Dairy Science, Theriogenology, Animal Reproduction Science and The Veterinary Journal utilizing the ScienceDirect database. The search revealed 259 articles addressing APM. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 48 trials remained. It was determined whether the author gave a clear definition of APM, the time of diagnosis relative to calving, and the person who performed the diagnosis. Studies were checked for the presence of definitions of possible findings, thresholds, and test characteristics of the methods used. Overall 9 different diagnostic methods were employed. On average 2·5 ± 1·75 diagnostic methods were used in a study. References to support the use of the diagnostic methods were provided in 10 of 48 articles (20·8%). Vaginal discharge, transrectal palpation and rectal temperature were examined in 39, 22, and 21 of the studies, respectively. Thresholds for diagnostic tests and test characteristics were mentioned in 6 and 3 of the 48 articles, respectively. Based on this systematic review of 48 research papers the evidence supporting the use of the diagnostic methods to identify cows with APM has either been not reported or is weak. In conclusion, the reporting of the diagnostic methods to identify cows with APM needs to be improved and further high-quality research is necessary to improve diagnostic performance of the methods employed.
本研究的总体目标是调查相关研究出版物如何解决奶牛急性产褥期子宫内膜炎(APM)诊断方法的有效性问题,这是一种常用抗生素药物治疗的疾病。因此,利用 ScienceDirect 数据库在《乳业科学杂志》、《生殖学杂志》、《动物繁殖科学杂志》和《兽医杂志》上进行了文献检索。检索结果显示有 259 篇文章涉及 APM。应用排除标准后,共有 48 项试验保留下来。确定作者是否明确界定了 APM、相对于产犊的诊断时间以及进行诊断的人员。研究检查了可能的发现、方法使用的阈值和测试特征的定义。共使用了 9 种不同的诊断方法。平均每个研究使用了 2.5±1.75 种诊断方法。48 篇文章中有 10 篇(20.8%)提到了支持使用诊断方法的参考文献。39 项研究检查了阴道分泌物、直肠触诊和直肠温度,22 项和 21 项研究分别检查了阴道分泌物、直肠触诊和直肠温度。在 48 篇文章中,有 6 篇和 3 篇分别提到了诊断试验的阈值和测试特征。根据对 48 篇研究论文的系统评价,支持使用诊断方法来识别患有 APM 的奶牛的证据要么没有报告,要么很薄弱。总之,需要改进用于识别患有 APM 的奶牛的诊断方法的报告,并且需要进一步进行高质量的研究以提高所使用方法的诊断性能。