Toriumi Yoshitaka, Kamei Tsutomu, Murata Kohji, Takahashi Ikuko, Suzuki Nobutaka, Mazda Osam
Department of Pediatrics, Ohmura Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Forsch Komplementmed. 2012;19(4):179-86. doi: 10.1159/000341547. Epub 2012 Aug 20.
In an influenza season where reduced effectiveness of oseltamivir was observed, we investigated the effectiveness of Maoto for influenza infection in children.
Patients diagnosed with influenza by rapid diagnostic kit underwent treatment in one of the following groups: Maoto-treated group (group 1 (M)); oseltamivir-treated group (group 2 (O)); Maoto+oseltamivir-treated group (group 3 (M+O)); zanamivir-treated group (group 4 (Z)); and Maoto+zanamivir-treated group (group 5 (M+Z)).
In influenza A patients who completed the study (n = 150), the mean duration of fever after administration (DFA) was significantly shorter in group 3 (M+O) (31.1 h, p < 0.01) and in group 4 (Z) (35.2 h, p < 0.05), as compared to group 2 (O) (56.0 h). Among these, in patients aged ≤5 years (n = 54), DFA was significantly shorter in group 1 (M) (33.2 h, p < 0.05) and in group 3 (M+O) (34.6 h, p < 0.05), as compared to group 2 (O) (61.4 h). In influenza B patients who completed the study (n = 70), no significant differences in DFA were observed among the groups.
Maoto may be useful, particularly in cases of influenza with low sensitivity to oseltamivir and in patients aged ≤5 years for whom the use of zanamivir is difficult.
在观察到奥司他韦有效性降低的流感季节,我们调查了麻杏石甘汤对儿童流感感染的有效性。
通过快速诊断试剂盒诊断为流感的患者在以下组之一接受治疗:麻杏石甘汤治疗组(第1组(M));奥司他韦治疗组(第2组(O));麻杏石甘汤+奥司他韦治疗组(第3组(M+O));扎那米韦治疗组(第4组(Z));以及麻杏石甘汤+扎那米韦治疗组(第5组(M+Z))。
在完成研究的甲型流感患者(n = 150)中,与第2组(O)(56.0小时)相比,第3组(M+O)(31.1小时,p < 0.01)和第4组(Z)(35.2小时,p < 0.05)给药后的平均发热持续时间(DFA)显著缩短。其中,在年龄≤5岁的患者(n = 54)中,与第2组(O)(61.4小时)相比,第1组(M)(33.2小时,p < 0.05)和第3组(M+O)(34.6小时,p < 0.05)的DFA显著缩短。在完成研究的乙型流感患者(n = 70)中,各组之间的DFA未观察到显著差异。
麻杏石甘汤可能有用,特别是在对奥司他韦敏感性低的流感病例以及难以使用扎那米韦的≤5岁患者中。