Holcomb J D, Selker L G, Roush R E
Department of Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Phys Ther. 1990 Feb;70(2):118-24. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.2.118.
A study of the scholarly activities of physical therapy faculty members in selected schools of allied health was conducted through a mailed questionnaire survey. The analysis of the data provided by the respondents (N = 127; 97.6%) revealed the following: 1) the respondents' primary scholarly activity was authorship of referred journal articles; 2) a majority of the respondents presented a paper at a professional meeting during the past three years; 3) only a small percentage of the respondents had directed extramurally funded projects; 4) the majority of the respondents indicated that their own academic preparation was the primary factor that encouraged their scholarly pursuits and that heavy teaching and administrative responsibilities were the primary discouraging factors; and 5) the respondents indicated that faculty scholarly activities are, and will continue to be, important considerations in academic promotion decisions. Comparison of the data provided by these respondents with data from the 1983 American Physical Therapy Association physical therapy faculty survey suggests modest gains in scholarly productivity. The implications of these findings are that faculty development programs are warranted and physical therapy administrators and faculty should join forces in finding more effective ways to involve faculty in research activities.
通过邮寄问卷调查的方式,对部分联合健康专业院校的物理治疗教员的学术活动进行了一项研究。对受访者提供的数据(N = 127;97.6%)进行分析后发现如下情况:1)受访者的主要学术活动是撰写被引用的期刊文章;2)大多数受访者在过去三年内在专业会议上发表过论文;3)只有一小部分受访者主持过校外资助项目;4)大多数受访者表示,他们自己的学术准备是鼓励他们进行学术追求的主要因素,而繁重的教学和行政职责是主要的阻碍因素;5)受访者表示,教员的学术活动过去是、将来也仍将是学术晋升决策中的重要考量因素。将这些受访者提供的数据与1983年美国物理治疗协会物理治疗教员调查的数据进行比较,结果表明学术产出略有提高。这些研究结果的意义在于,教员发展项目是有必要的,物理治疗管理人员和教员应携手合作,寻找更有效的方法让教员参与研究活动。