Rothman J, Rinehart M E
College of Staten Island, City University of New York 10301.
Phys Ther. 1990 May;70(5):310-3. doi: 10.1093/ptj/70.5.310.
The purpose of this study was to report on the status of faculty development in physical therapy education programs. A survey questionnaire was sent to the directors of 110 physical therapy programs nationwide. Analysis of responses from respondents (n = 79; 72%) demonstrated 1) criteria used to evaluate faculty members were similar among different institutions, 2) fewer than half of the institutions have a faculty development plan (FDP), 3) the majority of those institutions that have an FDP supported similar areas and activities to facilitate faculty development, and 4) respondents used creative ways to support faculty development. The results appear to indicate that most physical therapy programs do not have a formalized program to assist faculty members in their development of skills in research, teaching, and service. [Rothman J. Rinehart ME: A profile of faculty development in therapy education programs.
本研究的目的是报告物理治疗教育项目中教师发展的现状。一份调查问卷被发送给全国110个物理治疗项目的主任。对回复者（n = 79；72%）的回复分析表明：1）不同机构用于评估教师的标准相似；2）不到一半的机构有教师发展计划（FDP）；3）大多数有FDP的机构支持类似的领域和活动以促进教师发展；4）回复者采用创造性的方式支持教师发展。结果似乎表明，大多数物理治疗项目没有正式的项目来协助教师发展研究、教学和服务技能。[罗斯曼J. 莱因哈特ME：治疗教育项目中教师发展概况。
