National Bioenergy Center, National Renewable Energy Lab, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO, 80401, USA.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Sep 11;5(1):69. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-69.
Our companion paper discussed the yield benefits achieved by integrating deacetylation, mechanical refining, and washing with low acid and low temperature pretreatment. To evaluate the impact of the modified process on the economic feasibility, a techno-economic analysis (TEA) was performed based on the experimental data presented in the companion paper.
The cost benefits of dilute acid pretreatment technology combined with the process alternatives of deacetylation, mechanical refining, and pretreated solids washing were evaluated using cost benefit analysis within a conceptual modeling framework. Control cases were pretreated at much lower acid loadings and temperatures than used those in the NREL 2011 design case, resulting in much lower annual ethanol production. Therefore, the minimum ethanol selling prices (MESP) of the control cases were $0.41-$0.77 higher than the $2.15/gallon MESP of the design case. This increment is highly dependent on the carbohydrate content in the corn stover. However, if pretreatment was employed with either deacetylation or mechanical refining, the MESPs were reduced by $0.23-$0.30/gallon. Combing both steps could lower the MESP further by $0.44 ~ $0.54. Washing of the pretreated solids could also greatly improve the final ethanol yields. However, the large capital cost of the solid-liquid separation unit negatively influences the process economics. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed to study the effect of the cost of the pretreatment reactor and the energy input for mechanical refining. A 50% cost reduction in the pretreatment reactor cost reduced the MESP of the entire conversion process by $0.11-$0.14/gallon, while a 10-fold increase in energy input for mechanical refining will increase the MESP by $0.07/gallon.
Deacetylation and mechanical refining process options combined with low acid, low severity pretreatments show improvements in ethanol yields and calculated MESP for cellulosic ethanol production.
我们的相关论文讨论了通过整合脱乙酰作用、机械精炼和低酸、低温预处理后的洗涤工艺来提高产率的益处。为了评估该改良工艺对经济可行性的影响,我们根据相关论文中提出的实验数据进行了技术经济分析(TEA)。
通过在概念模型框架内使用成本效益分析,对稀酸预处理技术与脱乙酰作用、机械精炼和预处理固体洗涤等工艺替代方案相结合的成本效益进行了评估。对照案例的预处理酸负荷和温度均明显低于 NREL 2011 设计案例,导致每年的乙醇产量大大降低。因此,对照案例的最低乙醇销售价格(MESP)比设计案例的 2.15 美元/加仑 MESP 高出 0.41-0.77 美元。该增量高度依赖于玉米秸秆中的碳水化合物含量。然而,如果在预处理中采用脱乙酰作用或机械精炼中的任何一种,MESP 则会降低 0.23-0.30 美元/加仑。如果同时采用这两种工艺,MESP 可进一步降低 0.44-0.54 美元/加仑。对预处理固体的洗涤也可以大大提高最终的乙醇收率。然而,固液分离单元的高资本成本对工艺经济性产生负面影响。最后,进行了敏感性分析以研究预处理反应器成本和机械精炼能量输入的变化对结果的影响。预处理反应器成本降低 50%,整个转化过程的 MESP 将降低 0.11-0.14 美元/加仑,而机械精炼的能量输入增加 10 倍,MESP 将增加 0.07 美元/加仑。
与低酸、低强度预处理相结合的脱乙酰作用和机械精炼工艺选择可提高乙醇产率和纤维素乙醇生产的计算 MESP。