Bhalla Aditya, Fasahati Peyman, Particka Chrislyn A, Assad Aline E, Stoklosa Ryan J, Bansal Namita, Semaan Rachel, Saffron Christopher M, Hodge David B, Hegg Eric L
1DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, 1129 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
2Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 May 17;11:143. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1124-x. eCollection 2018.
When applied to recalcitrant lignocellulosic feedstocks, multi-stage pretreatments can provide more processing flexibility to optimize or balance process outcomes such as increasing delignification, preserving hemicellulose, and maximizing enzymatic hydrolysis yields. We previously reported that adding an alkaline pre-extraction step to a copper-catalyzed alkaline hydrogen peroxide (Cu-AHP) pretreatment process resulted in improved sugar yields, but the process still utilized relatively high chemical inputs (catalyst and HO) and enzyme loadings. We hypothesized that by increasing the temperature of the alkaline pre-extraction step in water or ethanol, we could reduce the inputs required during Cu-AHP pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis without significant loss in sugar yield. We also performed technoeconomic analysis to determine if ethanol or water was the more cost-effective solvent during alkaline pre-extraction and if the expense associated with increasing the temperature was economically justified.
After Cu-AHP pretreatment of 120 °C NaOH-HO pre-extracted and 120 °C NaOH-EtOH pre-extracted biomass, approximately 1.4-fold more total lignin was solubilized (78% and 74%, respectively) compared to the 30 °C NaOH-HO pre-extraction (55%) carried out in a previous study. Consequently, increasing the temperature of the alkaline pre-extraction step to 120 °C in both ethanol and water allowed us to decrease bipyridine and HO during Cu-AHP and enzymes during hydrolysis with only a small reduction in sugar yields compared to 30 °C alkaline pre-extraction. Technoeconomic analysis indicated that 120 °C NaOH-HO pre-extraction has the lowest installed ($246 million) and raw material ($175 million) costs compared to the other process configurations.
We found that by increasing the temperature of the alkaline pre-extraction step, we could successfully lower the inputs for pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Based on sugar yields as well as capital, feedstock, and operating costs, 120 °C NaOH-HO pre-extraction was superior to both 120 °C NaOH-EtOH and 30 °C NaOH-HO pre-extraction.
当应用于顽固的木质纤维素原料时,多阶段预处理可以提供更大的加工灵活性,以优化或平衡工艺结果,如提高脱木质素率、保留半纤维素以及最大化酶水解产率。我们之前报道过,在铜催化碱性过氧化氢(Cu - AHP)预处理工艺中添加碱性预提取步骤可提高糖产率,但该工艺仍使用相对较高的化学试剂投入量(催化剂和过氧化氢)以及酶负载量。我们推测,通过提高水或乙醇中碱性预提取步骤的温度,可以减少Cu - AHP预处理和酶水解过程中所需的投入量,而糖产率不会显著损失。我们还进行了技术经济分析,以确定乙醇或水在碱性预提取过程中哪种溶剂更具成本效益,以及提高温度所产生的费用在经济上是否合理。
对经120°C氢氧化钠 - 过氧化氢预提取和120°C氢氧化钠 - 乙醇预提取的生物质进行Cu - AHP预处理后,与之前研究中进行的30°C氢氧化钠 - 过氧化氢预提取(55%)相比,溶解的总木质素大约多了1.4倍(分别为78%和74%)。因此,将碱性预提取步骤在乙醇和水中的温度提高到120°C,使我们能够在Cu - AHP过程中减少联吡啶和过氧化氢的用量,并在水解过程中减少酶的用量,与30°C碱性预提取相比,糖产率仅略有降低。技术经济分析表明,与其他工艺配置相比,120°C氢氧化钠 - 过氧化氢预提取的安装成本(2.46亿美元)和原材料成本(1.75亿美元)最低。
我们发现,通过提高碱性预提取步骤的温度,可以成功降低预处理和酶水解的投入量。基于糖产率以及资本、原料和运营成本,120°C氢氧化钠 - 过氧化氢预提取优于120°C氢氧化钠 - 乙醇预提取和30°C氢氧化钠 - 过氧化氢预提取。