Ujeyl M, Müller-Oerlinghausen B
Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen Ärzteschaft, Geschäftsstelle, Herbert-Lewin-Platz 1, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland.
Schmerz. 2012 Sep;26(5):523-36. doi: 10.1007/s00482-012-1221-x.
Treatment of depression in palliative care must take into account expected benefits and risks of antidepressants in patients with potentially limited life expectancy, poor medical condition, advanced age and higher risk to suffer from side effects and drug interactions. This systematic review assesses evidence of the efficacy and safety of different classes of antidepressants depending on the type and severity of the physical illness.
A systematic database search (Medline, EMBASE) for clinical studies was carried out and references of identified literature were checked. To be included in the review studies had to be performed in illnesses that were part of in the search strategy, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, HIV/AIDS, cancer, COPD and heart failure. Considered were controlled studies comparing the efficacy of antidepressants to placebo, other classes of antidepressants, benzodiazepines, psychostimulants or psychotherapy. In a first step only studies with patients meeting established diagnostic criteria of depression and where depression was a primary endpoint were included. In a second step, additional studies were included that did not meet both of the latter criteria but were performed in patients at the end of life.
A total of 40 trials (mostly using SSRI or NSMRI) were included, 16 studies were performed in neurological, 24 in general medical conditions and 9 studies were performed in patients at the end of life or in advanced disease stages. Due to heterogeneous study designs no conclusions can be drawn if efficacy or tolerability is dependent on disease severity. In most cases, studies might have been too small to detect limited treatment effects. As a lack of efficacy was predominantly shown in larger trials, publication bias might have been present. In most of the reviewed general medical conditions study results were heterogeneous. In contrast to the popularity of the treatment approach, results suggest that SSRIs are not effective in Alzheimer's disease. In Parkinson's disease, negative studies are too small to prove lack of efficacy of SSRIs as present in the majority of trials.
This review of the evidence allows only limited conclusions concerning the use of antidepressants in physical illness disorders at the end of life. The reviewed evidence does not allow direct conclusions to be drawn concerning the use of antidepressants in different disease severities and its benefits compared to other treatment options (psychotherapy, benzodiazepines etc.). The English full text version of this article will be available in SpringerLink as of November 2012 (under "Supplemental").
姑息治疗中抑郁症的治疗必须考虑到抗抑郁药对于预期寿命可能有限、身体状况较差、年龄较大且出现副作用和药物相互作用风险较高的患者的预期益处和风险。本系统评价根据身体疾病的类型和严重程度评估不同类别抗抑郁药的疗效和安全性证据。
对临床研究进行系统的数据库检索(Medline、EMBASE),并检查已识别文献的参考文献。纳入本评价的研究必须在检索策略中涉及的疾病中进行,如多发性硬化症、帕金森病、阿尔茨海默病、艾滋病毒/艾滋病、癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和心力衰竭。考虑的是将抗抑郁药与安慰剂、其他类别抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物、精神兴奋剂或心理治疗的疗效进行比较的对照研究。第一步仅纳入符合既定抑郁症诊断标准且抑郁症为主要终点的患者的研究。第二步纳入了不符合后两个标准但在临终患者中进行的其他研究。
共纳入40项试验(大多使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或去甲肾上腺素能和特异性5-羟色胺能抗抑郁药),16项研究在神经系统疾病患者中进行,24项在普通内科疾病患者中进行。9项研究在临终患者或疾病晚期患者中进行。由于研究设计的异质性,如果疗效或耐受性取决于疾病严重程度,则无法得出结论。在大多数情况下,研究可能规模过小,无法检测到有限的治疗效果。由于在较大规模试验中主要显示缺乏疗效,可能存在发表偏倚。在大多数纳入评价的普通内科疾病中,研究结果具有异质性。与这种治疗方法的普及情况相反,结果表明选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在阿尔茨海默病中无效。在帕金森病中,阴性研究规模过小,无法证明大多数试验中选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂缺乏疗效。
本证据评价仅能就临终身体疾病中使用抗抑郁药得出有限结论。所评价的证据无法就抗抑郁药在不同疾病严重程度中的使用及其与其他治疗选择(心理治疗、苯二氮䓬类药物等)相比的益处得出直接结论。本文的英文全文版本将于2012年11月在SpringerLink上提供(在“补充材料”下)。