Levy Eli, Yakubovitch Dimtry, Rudis Ehud, Anner Haim, Landsberg Giora, Berlatzky Yaakov, Elami Amir
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;15(6):984-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs398. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
The management of concomitant coronary and carotid artery disease is still in evolution. The surgical options are staged approach--carotid endarterectomy (CEA), followed by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a reversed-staged approach, or combined approach--CEA and CABG under the same anaesthesia. In view of the percutaneous carotid artery stenting option, we have reviewed our short- and long-term experience with combined CEA and CABG to define the role of this procedure.
From January 1992 to December 2006, we operated on 80 patients performing combined carotid endarterctomy and myocardial revascularization. Short- and long-term results were reviewed.
Operative mortality was 3.7%. Perioperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA) occurred in 2 patients (2.5%). Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 3 patients (3.7%). Combined complications of death + MI + CVA = 10%. During the mean follow-up of 10 ± 3.2 years (1-14 years), 6 patients (7.6%) had neurological events. Freedom from neurological events for 10 years was 92 ± 4%. Nearly 17 (21.5%) had cardiac events. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 74 ± 5 and 62 ± 6%, respectively.
Although the short-term results of the non-surgical carotid therapeutic alternative is similar to our surgical results, there are limitations to carotid artery stenting: the need for aggressive antiplatelets therapy, and the haemodynamic changes during the procedure that may be unacceptable for patients with unstable coronary artery disease. Therefore, there is still a role for concomitant surgical CEA and CABG to the results of which the other options should be compared.
冠心病合并颈动脉疾病的治疗仍在不断发展。手术选择包括分期手术——颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),然后进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)或反向分期手术,或联合手术——在同一次麻醉下进行CEA和CABG。鉴于经皮颈动脉支架置入术的选择,我们回顾了我们联合CEA和CABG的短期和长期经验,以确定该手术的作用。
从1992年1月至2006年12月,我们对80例患者进行了联合颈动脉内膜切除术和心肌血运重建术。回顾了短期和长期结果。
手术死亡率为3.7%。围手术期脑血管意外(CVA)发生在2例患者(2.5%)。围手术期心肌梗死(MI)发生在3例患者(3.7%)。死亡+MI+CVA的联合并发症为10%。在平均10±3.2年(1 - 14年)的随访期间,6例患者(7.6%)发生神经事件。10年无神经事件发生率为92±4%。近17例(21.5%)发生心脏事件。5年和10年生存率分别为74±5%和62±6%。
虽然非手术颈动脉治疗替代方案的短期结果与我们的手术结果相似,但颈动脉支架置入术存在局限性:需要积极的抗血小板治疗,以及手术过程中的血流动力学变化可能对于不稳定型冠心病患者是不可接受的。因此,同期手术CEA和CABG仍有其作用,其他选择应与之结果进行比较。