Suppr超能文献

鉴于长期结果,探讨在颈动脉支架置入时代联合颈动脉内膜切除术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的作用。

The role of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of carotid stenting in view of long-term results.

作者信息

Levy Eli, Yakubovitch Dimtry, Rudis Ehud, Anner Haim, Landsberg Giora, Berlatzky Yaakov, Elami Amir

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;15(6):984-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs398. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The management of concomitant coronary and carotid artery disease is still in evolution. The surgical options are staged approach--carotid endarterectomy (CEA), followed by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or a reversed-staged approach, or combined approach--CEA and CABG under the same anaesthesia. In view of the percutaneous carotid artery stenting option, we have reviewed our short- and long-term experience with combined CEA and CABG to define the role of this procedure.

METHODS

From January 1992 to December 2006, we operated on 80 patients performing combined carotid endarterctomy and myocardial revascularization. Short- and long-term results were reviewed.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 3.7%. Perioperative cerebrovascular accident (CVA) occurred in 2 patients (2.5%). Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 3 patients (3.7%). Combined complications of death + MI + CVA = 10%. During the mean follow-up of 10 ± 3.2 years (1-14 years), 6 patients (7.6%) had neurological events. Freedom from neurological events for 10 years was 92 ± 4%. Nearly 17 (21.5%) had cardiac events. The 5-year and 10-year survival rates were 74 ± 5 and 62 ± 6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the short-term results of the non-surgical carotid therapeutic alternative is similar to our surgical results, there are limitations to carotid artery stenting: the need for aggressive antiplatelets therapy, and the haemodynamic changes during the procedure that may be unacceptable for patients with unstable coronary artery disease. Therefore, there is still a role for concomitant surgical CEA and CABG to the results of which the other options should be compared.

摘要

目的

冠心病合并颈动脉疾病的治疗仍在不断发展。手术选择包括分期手术——颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA),然后进行冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)或反向分期手术,或联合手术——在同一次麻醉下进行CEA和CABG。鉴于经皮颈动脉支架置入术的选择,我们回顾了我们联合CEA和CABG的短期和长期经验,以确定该手术的作用。

方法

从1992年1月至2006年12月,我们对80例患者进行了联合颈动脉内膜切除术和心肌血运重建术。回顾了短期和长期结果。

结果

手术死亡率为3.7%。围手术期脑血管意外(CVA)发生在2例患者(2.5%)。围手术期心肌梗死(MI)发生在3例患者(3.7%)。死亡+MI+CVA的联合并发症为10%。在平均10±3.2年(1 - 14年)的随访期间,6例患者(7.6%)发生神经事件。10年无神经事件发生率为92±4%。近17例(21.5%)发生心脏事件。5年和10年生存率分别为74±5%和62±6%。

结论

虽然非手术颈动脉治疗替代方案的短期结果与我们的手术结果相似,但颈动脉支架置入术存在局限性:需要积极的抗血小板治疗,以及手术过程中的血流动力学变化可能对于不稳定型冠心病患者是不可接受的。因此,同期手术CEA和CABG仍有其作用,其他选择应与之结果进行比较。

相似文献

1
The role of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting in the era of carotid stenting in view of long-term results.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;15(6):984-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs398. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
7
Combined carotid and cardiac surgery: improving the results.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;24(6):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.02.034. Epub 2010 May 13.
8
Operative and long-term outcomes of combined and staged carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 May;77(5):1424-1433.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.015. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Midterm results of coronary artery bypass graft surgery after synchronous or staged carotid revascularization.
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Dec;70(6):1942-1949. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.057. Epub 2019 May 29.
10
Lessons learned during a 30-year experience with simultaneous carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting.
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb;73(2):542-547. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.107. Epub 2020 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

2
Combining carotid endarterectomy with off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery is safe and effective.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2015 Oct-Dec;18(4):419-23. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.165457.
4
Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(2):121-5. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.35445. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
5
Should patients with asymptomatic significant carotid stenosis undergo simultaneous carotid and cardiac surgery?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):511-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt525. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
6
Influence of carotid injury in post-myocardial revascularization surgery and its late evolution.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Oct;101(4):297-303. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130183. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
5
Is haemodynamic depression during carotid stenting a predictor of peri-procedural complications?
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;35(4):399-404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.10.020. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
6
Endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting: the quest continues.
Am J Surg. 2008 Feb;195(2):259-69. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.022.
7
Sequential hybrid carotid and coronary artery revascularization: immediate and mid-term results.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov;84(5):1508-13; discussion 1513-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.048.
9
Rate, predictors, and consequences of hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Apr 18;47(8):1538-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.079. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
10
Late results of combined carotid and coronary surgery using actual versus actuarial methodology.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2091-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.029.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验