Matsuda Ayako, Yamaoka Kazue, Tango Toshiro
Surveillance Division Population-Based Cancer Registry Section, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center;
Exp Ther Med. 2012 Jan;3(1):134-140. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.368. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the only treatment option is palliative therapy, with the aim of prolonging overall survival and improving disease-related symptoms and quality of life (QOL). However, to date, the effect of palliative care on QOL has not yet been thoroughly examined, and there has been no meta-analysis of previous studies reporting QOL outcomes following palliative care. We consider that it is important to evaluate not only survival and/or response rates, but also QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving palliative chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to obtain useful information for the selection of suitable chemotherapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients, taking into consideration QOL, and to demonstrate the importance of QOL assessments during treatment. We performed a meta-analysis of QOL outcomes following treatments that compared carboplatin- to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Trials were eligible for analysis if they had compared carboplatin- to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients who had not received prior chemotherapy, and if these studies reported QOL data. In the six trials eligible for analysis, 2,405 patients were randomized to receive cisplatin-based or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. The patients who received carboplatin-based chemotherapy had higher global QOL and less severe symptoms than those who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The survival rate, which was the primary outcome in clinical trials, and the response rate did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. It is important to evaluate QOL in addition to the survival and response rates for advanced NSCLC, particularly when the treatment is palliative.
对于晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,唯一的治疗选择是姑息治疗,目的是延长总生存期、改善与疾病相关的症状及生活质量(QOL)。然而,迄今为止,姑息治疗对生活质量的影响尚未得到充分研究,也没有对先前报道姑息治疗后生活质量结果的研究进行荟萃分析。我们认为,对于接受姑息化疗的晚期NSCLC患者,不仅评估生存率和/或缓解率,而且评估生活质量也很重要。本研究的目的是考虑生活质量,为晚期NSCLC患者选择合适的化疗方案获取有用信息,并证明治疗期间生活质量评估的重要性。我们对比较基于卡铂与基于顺铂化疗的治疗后生活质量结果进行了荟萃分析。如果试验比较了未接受过先前化疗的晚期NSCLC患者中基于卡铂与基于顺铂的化疗,并且这些研究报告了生活质量数据,则该试验符合分析条件。在六项符合分析条件的试验中,2405例患者被随机分配接受基于顺铂或基于卡铂的化疗。接受基于卡铂化疗的患者比接受基于顺铂化疗的患者具有更高的总体生活质量和更轻的症状。作为临床试验主要结局的生存率和缓解率在两个治疗组之间没有显著差异。除了晚期NSCLC的生存率和缓解率外,评估生活质量也很重要,特别是在治疗为姑息性治疗时。