• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线甲状腺手术患者教育材料的可读性评估。

Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2013 Oct;35(10):1421-5. doi: 10.1002/hed.23157. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1002/hed.23157
PMID:22972634
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Published guidelines recommend written health information be written at or below the sixth-grade level. We evaluate the readability of online materials related to thyroid surgery.

METHODS

Thyroid surgery materials were evaluated using Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook (GFOG), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG).

RESULTS

Thirty-one documents were evaluated. FRES scores ranged from 29.3 to 67.8 (possible range = 0 to 100), and averaged 50.5. FKGL ranged from 6.9 to 14.9 (possible range = 3 to 12), and averaged 10.4. SMOG scores ranged from 11.8 to 14.5 (possible range = 3 to 19), and averaged 13.0. GFOG scores ranged from 10.6 to 18.0 (possible range = 3 to 19), and averaged 13.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Readability scores for online thyroid surgery materials are higher (i.e., more difficult) than the recommended levels. However, readability is only one aspect of comprehension. Written information should be designed with that fact in mind.

摘要

背景

已发布的指南建议将书面健康信息编写为六年级或以下的水平。我们评估了与甲状腺手术相关的在线材料的可读性。

方法

使用 Flesch 阅读容易度得分(FRES)、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平(FKGL)、Gunning 胡言乱语频率(GFOG)和简单胡言乱语测量(SMOG)评估甲状腺手术材料。

结果

评估了 31 份文件。FRES 分数范围为 29.3 至 67.8(可能范围为 0 至 100),平均为 50.5。FKGL 范围为 6.9 至 14.9(可能范围为 3 至 12),平均为 10.4。SMOG 分数范围为 11.8 至 14.5(可能范围为 3 至 19),平均为 13.0。GFOG 分数范围为 10.6 至 18.0(可能范围为 3 至 19),平均为 13.5。

结论

在线甲状腺手术材料的可读性得分高于(即更难)建议水平。然而,可读性只是理解的一个方面。在设计书面信息时应考虑到这一事实。

相似文献

1
Readability assessment of online thyroid surgery patient education materials.在线甲状腺手术患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Head Neck. 2013 Oct;35(10):1421-5. doi: 10.1002/hed.23157. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
2
Readability Assessment of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Related to Parathyroid Surgery.基于互联网的甲状旁腺手术患者教育材料的可读性评估
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015 Jul;124(7):523-7. doi: 10.1177/0003489414567938. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
3
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.在线气管造口护理资源的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
4
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.基于互联网的内镜鼻窦手术相关患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Aug;122(8):1649-54. doi: 10.1002/lary.23309. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
5
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.基于互联网的乳腺癌筛查乳腺X线摄影相关患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.在线眼科患者信息的可读性评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1610-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5521.
7
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization.基于互联网的子宫动脉栓塞术相关患者教育材料的可读性评估。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
8
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures.基于网络的面部骨折患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1943-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.23424. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
9
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
10
Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to acoustic neuromas.基于互联网的听神经瘤患者教育资料的可读性评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Sep;34(7):1349-54. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829530e5.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Educational Materials for Pheochromocytoma Exceed Recommended Readability Level: An Analysis Across Three Independent Reading Instruments.嗜铬细胞瘤患者教育材料超出推荐的可读性水平:基于三种独立阅读工具的分析
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02666-3.
2
Online Health Education About Sialendoscopy: A Study on Readability and Reliability.关于唾液腺内镜检查的在线健康教育:可读性与可靠性研究
OTO Open. 2025 Apr 25;9(2):e70117. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70117. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Modern internet search analytics and thyroidectomy: What are patients asking?
现代互联网搜索分析与甲状腺切除术:患者都在问些什么?
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jul 6;10(1):49-58. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.117. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Comprehensiveness of online sources for patient education on otosclerosis.耳硬化症患者教育在线资源的全面性。
Front Surg. 2024 Jan 24;11:1327793. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1327793. eCollection 2024.
5
The readability of online patient education materials on maxillomandibular advancement surgery.在线颌骨前徙手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Sleep Breath. 2024 May;28(2):745-751. doi: 10.1007/s11325-023-02952-8. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.基于互联网的颈部解剖患者信息的关键可读性与质量分析
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Readability of information imprinted in patient information leaflets (PILs) in Saudi Arabia: The case of antihypertensive medications.沙特阿拉伯患者信息说明书(PILs)中印刻信息的可读性:以抗高血压药物为例。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2022 Sep 16;8:100179. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100179. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Comprehension Profile of Patient Education Materials in Endocrine Care.内分泌护理中患者教育材料的理解概况。
Kans J Med. 2022 Jul 21;15(2):247-252. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529. eCollection 2022.
9
Patient and family involvement in Choosing Wisely initiatives: a mixed methods study.患者和家属参与明智选择倡议:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07861-2.
10
Care and Management of Voice Change in Thyroid Surgery: Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics Clinical Practice Guideline.甲状腺手术中嗓音变化的护理与管理:韩国喉科学、语音学与言语治疗学会临床实践指南
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;15(1):24-48. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2021.00633. Epub 2021 Jun 1.