• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内分泌护理中患者教育材料的理解概况。

Comprehension Profile of Patient Education Materials in Endocrine Care.

作者信息

Singh Som P, Qureshi Fahad M, Borthwick Kiera G, Singh Sagar, Menon Shreya, Barthel Brandon

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO.

Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.

出版信息

Kans J Med. 2022 Jul 21;15(2):247-252. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529
PMID:35899057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9311631/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The internet is an ever-evolving resource to improve healthcare literacy among patients. The nature of the internet can make it difficult to condense educational materials in a manner applicable to a worldwide patient audience. Within the realm of endocrinology, there is lack of a comprehensive analysis regarding these pathologies in addition to education materials related to their medical work-up or management. The aim of this study was to assess contemporary online patient education material in endocrinology and management of care.

METHODS

Analysis of the readability of 1,500 unique online education materials was performed utilizing seven readability measures: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog Index Readability Formula (FOG), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Index (SMOG), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), automated readability index (ARI), and Linsear Write Formula (LWF).

RESULTS

The average grade level readability scores from six measures (e.g., FKGL, FOG, SMOG, CLI, ARI, LWF) was more than or equal to 11 which corresponds to a reading level at or above the 11th grade. The average FRE between adrenal, diabetes, and thyroid-related education m aterial ranged between "fairly difficult" to "very difficult".

CONCLUSIONS

The readability of contemporary online endocrine education material did not meet current readability recommendations for appropriate comprehension of the general audience.

摘要

引言

互联网是一种不断发展的资源,可用于提高患者的医疗素养。互联网的特性使得难以以适用于全球患者群体的方式浓缩教育材料。在内分泌学领域,除了与疾病检查或管理相关的教育材料外,对于这些病症缺乏全面分析。本研究的目的是评估内分泌学方面当代在线患者教育材料及护理管理情况。

方法

利用七种可读性测量方法对1500份独特的在线教育材料的可读性进行分析:弗莱什易读性指数(FRE)、弗莱什-金凯德年级水平指数(FKGL)、冈宁雾度指数可读性公式(FOG)、简单费解度指数(SMOG)、科尔曼-廖指数(CLI)、自动可读性指数(ARI)和林西厄书写公式(LWF)。

结果

六种测量方法(如FKGL、FOG、SMOG、CLI、ARI、LWF)的平均年级水平可读性得分大于或等于11,这对应于11年级及以上的阅读水平。肾上腺、糖尿病和甲状腺相关教育材料之间的平均FRE在“相当困难”到“非常困难”之间。

结论

当代在线内分泌教育材料的可读性未达到当前关于普通受众适当理解的可读性建议。

相似文献

1
Comprehension Profile of Patient Education Materials in Endocrine Care.内分泌护理中患者教育材料的理解概况。
Kans J Med. 2022 Jul 21;15(2):247-252. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.16529. eCollection 2022.
2
Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.减重手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6519-6525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10153-3. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
3
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
4
Readability of online patient education material for foregut surgery.上消化道手术患者教育在线材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5259-5265. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11042-z. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
Readability and Suitability of Online Patient Education Materials for Glaucoma.青光眼在线患者教育材料的可读性和适宜性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Sep-Oct;5(5):525-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
6
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.关于髋骨关节炎在线信息可读性的横断面分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60536. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Evaluating the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Trigeminal Neuralgia.评估三叉神经痛在线患者教育材料的可读性。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:e934-e938. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.123. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Academic and community hernia center websites in the United States fail to meet healthcare literacy standards of readability.美国的学术和社区疝中心网站未能达到可及性的卫生保健读写能力标准。
Hernia. 2022 Jun;26(3):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02584-z. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
9
Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability.针对阑尾切除术患者的在线教育材料质量较好,但可读性较差。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1203-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
10
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Patient Education on Cardiovascular Rehabilitation with Large Language Models.利用大语言模型加强心血管康复患者教育
Mo Med. 2025 Jan-Feb;122(1):67-71.
2
Modern Digital Query Analytics of Patient Education Materials on Acanthosis Nigricans: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.黑棘皮病患者教育材料的现代数字查询分析:系统检索与内容分析
JMIR Dermatol. 2025 Jan 6;8:e60210. doi: 10.2196/60210.
3
Digital Education on Hospital Nutrition Diets: What Do Patients Want to Know?医院营养膳食的数字化教育:患者想知道什么?
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3314. doi: 10.3390/nu16193314.
4
Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence Models in Patient Education on Inferior Vena Cava Filters.在下肢静脉滤器患者教育中利用生成式人工智能模型
Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 30;14(4):1507-1514. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14040121.
5
Unlocking Health Literacy: The Ultimate Guide to Hypertension Education From ChatGPT Versus Google Gemini.解锁健康素养:ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini高血压教育终极指南
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59898. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59898. eCollection 2024 May.
6
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?心血管医学中可获取患者资源的健康素养分析:患者想了解什么?
Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16(3):309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Wikipedia, friend or foe regarding information on diabetic retinopathy? A content analysis in the world's leading 19 languages.维基百科,关于糖尿病视网膜病变信息的朋友还是敌人?在世界 19 种主要语言中的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0258246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258246. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and assessment of a low-health-literacy, pictographic adrenal insufficiency action plan.开发并评估一个低健康素养、图像为主的肾上腺功能减退症行动计划。
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Sep 30;35(2):205-215. doi: 10.1515/jpem-2021-0541. Print 2022 Feb 23.
3
Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.足踝畸形患者的健康素养:在线患者教育材料的可阅读性、可理解性和可操作性的定量评估。
Iowa Orthop J. 2021;41(1):61-67.
4
Characteristics of available studies and dissemination of research using major clinical data sharing platforms.可用研究的特征和利用主要临床数据共享平台进行的研究传播。
Clin Trials. 2021 Dec;18(6):657-666. doi: 10.1177/17407745211038524. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
5
An eHealth Framework for Managing Pediatric Growth Disorders and Growth Hormone Therapy.电子健康框架在儿童生长障碍及生长激素治疗管理中的应用。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 20;23(5):e27446. doi: 10.2196/27446.
6
Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students.中国大学生的在线健康信息搜索行为和技能。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0.
7
A Pragmatic Assessment of Google Translate for Emergency Department Instructions.Google 翻译在急诊科医嘱中的实用性评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3361-3365. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06666-z. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
Effectiveness of Disease-Specific mHealth Apps in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.疾病特异性移动医疗应用程序在糖尿病患者中的有效性:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 15;9(2):e23477. doi: 10.2196/23477.
9
Information Seeking as A Predictor of Risk Behavior: Testing A Behavior and Risk Information Engagement Model (BRIE).信息寻求作为风险行为的预测指标:测试行为和风险信息参与模型(BRIE)。
J Health Commun. 2020 Jun 2;25(6):474-483. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1797247. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.互联网上脊柱侧凸特定信息的横断面分析:可能导致患者困惑和错误信息。
Spine Deform. 2020 Dec;8(6):1159-1167. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00156-8. Epub 2020 Jun 23.