Orringer M B, Stirling M C
Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Jan;49(1):35-42; discussion 42-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90353-8.
When esophageal disruption occurs in the presence of preexisting esophageal disease or is associated with sepsis or fluid and electrolyte imbalance, aggressive and definitive therapy often provides the only chance for patient salvage. Twenty-four adults (average age, 59 years) with intrathoracic esophageal perforations underwent esophagectomy: 15, transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy; and 9, transthoracic esophagectomy. Restoration of alimentary continuity with an immediate cervical esophagogastric anastomosis was carried out in 13 patients. Eleven underwent a cervical or anterior thoracic esophagostomy, and 10 of them had a subsequent colonic (7) or gastric (3) interposition from 4 to 32 weeks (average time, 8.6 weeks) later. The perforations were due to esophageal instrumentation (9 patients), acute caustic ingestion (2), emesis (2), intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic disruption (2), and other causes (9). Preexisting esophageal disease in 20 patients included chronic strictures (10 patients), reflux esophagitis (3), esophageal cancer (3), achalasia (2), diffuse spasm (2), and monilial esophagitis (1 patient). Ten patients were operated on within 12 hours after the injury; 3, within 12 to 24 hours; and 11, within three to 45 days (average interval, 6.6 days). There were three hospital deaths (13%). Nineteen of the 21 survivors were able to swallow comfortably until the time of death or latest follow-up. Aggressive diagnosis and aggressive treatment of life-threatening esophageal perforations are advocated. Conservative procedures (repair, diversion, or drainage) for a perforation with preexisting esophageal disease often inflict more morbidity than esophageal resection, which eliminates the perforation, the source of sepsis, and the underlying esophageal disease. The decision to restore alimentary continuity in a single stage must be individualized.
当食管破裂发生在已有食管疾病的情况下,或与脓毒症、液体和电解质失衡相关时,积极而确切的治疗往往是挽救患者的唯一机会。24例胸段食管穿孔的成年患者(平均年龄59岁)接受了食管切除术:15例行经裂孔非开胸食管切除术;9例行经胸食管切除术。13例患者通过立即行颈部食管胃吻合术恢复了消化道连续性。11例行颈部或前胸段食管造口术,其中10例在4至32周(平均时间8.6周)后接受了结肠(7例)或胃(3例)代食管术。穿孔原因包括食管器械操作(9例)、急性腐蚀性物质摄入(2例)、呕吐(2例)、胸段食管胃吻合口破裂(2例)以及其他原因(9例)。20例患者的原有食管疾病包括慢性狭窄(10例)、反流性食管炎(3例)、食管癌(3例)、贲门失弛缓症(2例)、弥漫性痉挛(2例)和念珠菌性食管炎(1例)。10例患者在受伤后12小时内接受手术;3例在12至24小时内;11例在3至45天内(平均间隔6.6天)。有3例患者死于医院(13%)。21例幸存者中有19例在死亡或最后一次随访时能够舒适地吞咽。提倡对危及生命的食管穿孔进行积极诊断和积极治疗。对于已有食管疾病的穿孔,保守手术(修补、转流或引流)往往比食管切除术导致更多的并发症,食管切除术可消除穿孔、脓毒症来源及潜在的食管疾病。一期恢复消化道连续性的决定必须个体化。