Bin Nordin R, Araki S, Sato H, Yokoyama K, Bin Wan Muda W A, Win Kyi D
Department of Public Health and Occupational Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Malays J Med Sci. 2001 Jan;8(1):1-10.
To identify gender difference in safe and unsafe practice of pesticide handling in tobacco farmers of Malaysia, we conducted a 20-item questionnaire interview on storage of pesticide (4 questions), mixing of pesticide (3 questions), use of personal protective equipment and clothing while spraying pesticide (7 questions), activities during and after spraying of pesticide (5 questions), and maintenance of pesticide sprayer (1 question) in 496 tobacco farmers (395 males and 101 females) in Bachok District, Kelantan, Malaysia. Duration of employment was significantly longer in females than those in males (p<0.001). In addition, proportion with no formal education in females was significantly higher than those in males (p<0.05). The following eight common factors were extracted from the 20 questionnaires by principal components factor analysis after varimax rotation in all farmers: (1) use of personal protective equipment, (2) unsafe work habit, (3) reading and following instructions on pesticide label, (4) security, storage and disposal of pesticide container, (5) safe work habit, (6) proper handling of pesticide and maintenance of pesticide sprayer, (7) use of personal protective clothing, and (8) safe handling of pesticide. Results of analysis of covariance for the eight factor scores of all male and female farmers, controlling for educational level and duration of employment, showed that: (1) factor scores for use of personal protective equipment (p<0.001), use of personal protective clothing (p<0.001) and safe work habit (p<0.001) in females were significantly lower than those in males; (2) conversely, factor scores for reading and following instruction on pesticide label (p<0.001) and proper handling of pesticide and maintenance of pesticide sprayer (p<0.01) in males were significantly lower than those in females; and (3) there were no significant differences in other three factor scores (p>0.05). We therefore conclude that: (1) for female tobacco farmers, choice of personal attire tend to result in lower scores on use of personal protective equipment and personal protective clothing while personal hygiene practices result in lower score on safe work habit; and, (2) for male tobacco farmers, the lower scores on reading and following instruction on pesticide label and mixing pesticide and maintenance of pesticide sprayer in good condition suggests that they were not primarily involved in these activities. It is postulated that these differences in safe and unsafe practices of pesticide handling across gender is related to the choice of personal attire, personal hygiene practices and division of labour within farming households which in turn is influenced by prevailing sociocultural norms in the community.
为了确定马来西亚烟农在农药处理安全与不安全操作方面的性别差异,我们对马来西亚吉兰丹州巴株巴辖地区的496名烟农(395名男性和101名女性)进行了一项包含20个问题的问卷调查,内容涉及农药储存(4个问题)、农药混合(3个问题)、喷洒农药时个人防护设备和服装的使用(7个问题)、喷洒农药期间及之后的活动(5个问题)以及农药喷雾器的维护(1个问题)。女性的从业时间显著长于男性(p<0.001)。此外,女性中未接受正规教育的比例显著高于男性(p<0.05)。通过对所有烟农进行方差最大化旋转后的主成分因子分析,从20份问卷中提取出以下八个常见因素:(1)个人防护设备的使用;(2)不安全的工作习惯;(3)阅读并遵循农药标签说明;(4)农药容器的安全、储存和处置;(5)安全的工作习惯;(6)农药的正确处理及农药喷雾器的维护;(7)个人防护服的使用;(8)农药的安全处理。对所有男性和女性烟农的八个因子得分进行协方差分析,控制教育水平和从业时间后,结果显示:(1)女性在个人防护设备的使用(p<0.001)、个人防护服的使用(p<0.001)和安全工作习惯(p<0.001)方面的因子得分显著低于男性;(2)相反,男性在阅读并遵循农药标签说明(p<0.001)以及农药的正确处理及农药喷雾器的维护(p<0.01)方面的因子得分显著低于女性;(3)其他三个因子得分无显著差异(p>0.05)。因此,我们得出结论:(1)对于女性烟农而言,个人着装选择往往导致个人防护设备和个人防护服使用方面的得分较低,而个人卫生习惯则导致安全工作习惯方面的得分较低;(2)对于男性烟农而言,在阅读并遵循农药标签说明以及农药混合和农药喷雾器良好维护方面得分较低,表明他们并非主要参与这些活动。据推测,不同性别在农药处理安全与不安全操作方面的这些差异与个人着装选择、个人卫生习惯以及农户家庭内部的劳动分工有关,而这又反过来受到社区中普遍存在的社会文化规范的影响。