Department of Parasitology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044394. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
The mechanisms by which humans regulate pro- and anti-inflammatory responses on exposure to different malaria parasites remains unclear. Although Plasmodium vivax usually causes a relatively benign disease, this parasite has been suggested to elicit more host inflammation per parasitized red blood cell than P. falciparum.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We measured plasma concentrations of seven cytokines and two soluble tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α receptors, and evaluated clinical and laboratory outcomes, in Brazilians with acute uncomplicated infections with P. vivax (n = 85), P. falciparum (n = 30), or both species (n = 12), and in 45 asymptomatic carriers of low-density P. vivax infection. Symptomatic vivax malaria patients, compared to those infected with P. falciparum or both species, had more intense paroxysms, but they had no clear association with a pro-inflammatory imbalance. To the contrary, these patients had higher levels of the regulatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-10, which correlated positively with parasite density, and elevated IL-10/TNF-α, IL-10/interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-10/IL-6 and sTNFRII/TNF-α ratios, compared to falciparum or mixed-species malaria patient groups. Vivax malaria patients had the highest levels of circulating soluble TNF-α receptor sTNFRII. Levels of regulatory cytokines returned to normal values 28 days after P. vivax clearance following chemotherapy. Finally, asymptomatic carriers of low P. vivax parasitemias had substantially lower levels of both inflammatory and regulatory cytokines than did patients with clinical malaria due to either species.
Controlling fast-multiplying P. falciparum blood stages requires a strong inflammatory response to prevent fulminant infections, while reducing inflammation-related tissue damage with early regulatory cytokine responses may be a more cost-effective strategy in infections with the less virulent P. vivax parasite. The early induction of regulatory cytokines may be a critical mechanism protecting vivax malaria patients from severe clinical complications.
人类在接触不同疟原虫时调节促炎和抗炎反应的机制尚不清楚。虽然间日疟原虫通常引起相对良性的疾病,但有研究表明,与恶性疟原虫相比,每感染一个受疟原虫感染的红细胞,间日疟原虫会引起更多的宿主炎症。
方法/主要发现:我们测量了 7 种细胞因子和 2 种可溶性肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α受体的血浆浓度,并评估了巴西急性无并发症感染间日疟原虫(n=85)、恶性疟原虫(n=30)或两种寄生虫(n=12)以及 45 例低密度间日疟原虫感染无症状携带者的临床和实验室结果。与感染恶性疟原虫或两种寄生虫的患者相比,有症状的间日疟患者的发作更剧烈,但与促炎失衡没有明显关联。相反,这些患者的调节性细胞因子白细胞介素(IL)-10 水平更高,与寄生虫密度呈正相关,且与促炎细胞因子 TNF-α、IFN-γ、IL-6 比值升高,与恶性疟或混合寄生虫疟疾患者组相比,可溶性 TNF-α受体 sTNFRII/TNF-α、IL-10/TNF-α、IL-10/IL-6 和 sTNFRII/TNF-α 的比值更高。间日疟患者的循环可溶性 TNF-α受体 sTNFRII 水平最高。化疗清除间日疟原虫后 28 天,调节性细胞因子水平恢复正常。最后,与感染恶性疟或间日疟的临床疟疾患者相比,低密度间日疟原虫携带者的炎症和调节性细胞因子水平均显著降低。
控制快速繁殖的恶性疟原虫血液阶段需要强烈的炎症反应以防止暴发性感染,而早期通过调节性细胞因子反应减轻与炎症相关的组织损伤可能是感染毒力较弱的间日疟原虫更为有效的策略。早期诱导调节性细胞因子可能是保护间日疟患者免受严重临床并发症的关键机制。