Folkhälsan Research Center, Paasikivenkatu 4, 00250 Helsinki, Finland.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jun;16(6):1109-17. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004181. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
To determine whether an association exists between different clusters of fruit- and vegetable-specific family-environmental factors and children's daily fruit and vegetable intake, and whether these associations differ between countries with different school lunch policies.
Cross-sectional data from four European countries participating in the Pro Greens project in 2009. These countries have different school food policies: two serve free school lunches and two do not. Self-administered data were used. Food frequency questions served to assess fruit and vegetable intakes. The study assessed sixteen children-perceived family-environmental factors, which were clustered based on principal component analysis into five sum variables: fruit and vegetable encouragement; vegetable modelling, family routine and demand; fruit modelling; fruit and vegetable snacking practices; and fruit and vegetable allowing.
Schools in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands.
Schoolchildren aged 11 years (n 3317).
Multilevel logistic regression analyses revealed positive associations between nearly all clustered family-environmental factors and daily fruit and vegetable intake. The study tested a moderation effect between family-environmental factors and school lunch policy. In five out of twenty models significant interactions occurred. In the stratified analyses, most of the associations between family-environmental factors and raw and cooked vegetable intake were stronger in Germany and the Netherlands, neither of which provided free school lunches.
Children reporting more fruit- and vegetable-promoting family-environmental factors had a more frequent intake of fruits and vegetables; the associations were stronger for vegetable intakes in countries providing no free school lunches, suggesting that parental involvement is crucial when schools offer no vegetables.
确定不同簇的水果和蔬菜特定家庭环境因素与儿童日常水果和蔬菜摄入量之间是否存在关联,以及这些关联在不同实行不同学校午餐政策的国家之间是否存在差异。
2009 年参加 Pro Greens 项目的四个欧洲国家的横断面数据。这些国家的学校食品政策不同:两个提供免费学校午餐,两个不提供。使用自我管理的数据。食物频率问题用于评估水果和蔬菜的摄入量。该研究评估了十六个儿童感知的家庭环境因素,这些因素基于主成分分析聚类为五个总和变量:水果和蔬菜鼓励;蔬菜模型、家庭常规和需求;水果模型;水果和蔬菜零食习惯;和水果和蔬菜允许。
芬兰、德国、瑞典和荷兰的学校。
年龄为 11 岁的学龄儿童(n 3317)。
多层次逻辑回归分析显示,几乎所有聚类的家庭环境因素与每日水果和蔬菜摄入量之间存在正相关。该研究测试了家庭环境因素与学校午餐政策之间的调节效应。在二十个模型中的五个中,存在显著的交互作用。在分层分析中,在既不提供免费学校午餐的德国和荷兰,家庭环境因素与生蔬菜和熟蔬菜摄入量之间的大多数关联更强,这表明当学校不提供蔬菜时,父母的参与至关重要。
报告水果和蔬菜促进家庭环境因素较多的儿童更频繁地摄入水果和蔬菜;在不提供免费学校午餐的国家,蔬菜摄入量的关联更强,这表明当学校不提供蔬菜时,父母的参与至关重要。